Freethought & Rationalism Archive

djrafikie · 08-29-2007, 05:44 AM

I noted that there is a surefeit of paedophilia and bestiaility themed threads, and it has also been commented on by other people...

So, maintaining the theme but in a fresh (or maybe not in this case) way, I am posing an even more worrying question.

Is NECROPHILIA immoral?

This is not a joke, seriously, when you talk about paedophilia there are obvious issues regarding consent, and the same applies to bestiality.

But when the object of sexual affection is in fact dead they are hardly going to develop long term mental damage, or leave you for the cat down the road.

So, what do you all think?:devil1:

Christina Mirabilis · 08-29-2007, 05:52 AM

I think it's fine, but you should probably take a shower afterwards if they've started to decompose. Hygiene and all that...

Welcome back

Godless Dave · 08-29-2007, 05:52 AM

This is one of those cases where my brain's moral sense responds to necrophilia as being extremely icky. After careful reflection, I am going to go with my gut reaction even though I can't reason exactly why it's immoral.

Because seriously, it's pretty damn icky.

djrafikie · 08-29-2007, 05:57 AM

Hay christina! *Hugs*

Godless Dave - would it matter if they were nice and fresh? Like, still warm..

Or is it a primative "maggot complex" kicking in?

See, Morally I can't find any problems with making the beast with two backs with a recently departed person..
I'm sure a condom would be a good idea and it might be a bit boring having a somewhat "unresponsive" partner (or maybe not so different from usual...).

Christina Mirabilis · 08-29-2007, 06:00 AM

I almost asked you how you would know they were 'done' but I guess you'd be off the hook on the pleasing your partner bit.

Dave, it has a massive ick factor to me also, but I can't find a moral issue in there.

Godless Dave · 08-29-2007, 06:12 AM

Many people have pretty specific wishes for what happens to their body after they die. I imagine there are some people who want it to be fucked. I suppose in such cases it might not be immoral for people to fuck those dead bodies.

But I would still object, for the same reason I object to consensual sibling incest - eww. I think there's a chance, however slim, that my brain might have this eww response for long-forgotten evolutionary reasons. Normally that wouldn't be enough for me to go by, but there are a few special cases where eww factor is strong enough for me to make an exception.

Godless Dave · 08-29-2007, 06:15 AM

Wait, back up.

Quote:

Originally Posted by djrafikie

Is NECROPHILIA immoral?

No, necrophilia isn't immoral. Neither are pedophilia or zoophilia. Actually doing it is immoral.

Christina Mirabilis · 08-29-2007, 06:18 AM

I think that Dave just brought up an interesting point. If the original owner had specific wishes about how their remains were to be handled, is it immoral to go against those wishes? (Not that I can imagine someone specifiying 'and please don't fuck me when I'm gone").

David B · 08-29-2007, 06:25 AM

Aren't all these sadism, necrophilia and bestiality threads flogging a dead horse?

David B (once heard of someone who ysed to be into necrophilia, until some rotten cunt split on him)

Christina Mirabilis · 08-29-2007, 06:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David B

Aren't all these sadism, necrophilia and bestiality threads flogging a dead horse?

David B (once heard of someone who ysed to be into necrophilia, until some rotten cunt split on him)

*groans

ETA

I knew I'd find a use for that one someday.

08-29-2007, 05:44 AM	#1
djrafikie Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: u.k, back of beyond, we have scones and cream teas Posts: 2,534	Enough already.... I'm dying here! I noted that there is a surefeit of paedophilia and bestiaility themed threads, and it has also been commented on by other people... So, maintaining the theme but in a fresh (or maybe not in this case) way, I am posing an even more worrying question. Is NECROPHILIA immoral? This is not a joke, seriously, when you talk about paedophilia there are obvious issues regarding consent, and the same applies to bestiality. But when the object of sexual affection is in fact dead they are hardly going to develop long term mental damage, or leave you for the cat down the road. So, what do you all think?:devil1:

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

08-29-2007, 05:52 AM	#2
Christina Mirabilis Banned Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 5,676	I think it's fine, but you should probably take a shower afterwards if they've started to decompose. Hygiene and all that... Welcome back

08-29-2007, 05:52 AM	#3
Godless Dave Contributor Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: With 10,000 lakes who needs a coast? Posts: 10,762	This is one of those cases where my brain's moral sense responds to necrophilia as being extremely icky. After careful reflection, I am going to go with my gut reaction even though I can't reason exactly why it's immoral. Because seriously, it's pretty damn icky.

08-29-2007, 05:57 AM	#4
djrafikie Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: u.k, back of beyond, we have scones and cream teas Posts: 2,534	Hay christina! Hugs Godless Dave - would it matter if they were nice and fresh? Like, still warm.. Or is it a primative "maggot complex" kicking in? See, Morally I can't find any problems with making the beast with two backs with a recently departed person.. I'm sure a condom would be a good idea and it might be a bit boring having a somewhat "unresponsive" partner (or maybe not so different from usual...).

08-29-2007, 06:00 AM	#5
Christina Mirabilis Banned Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 5,676	I almost asked you how you would know they were 'done' but I guess you'd be off the hook on the pleasing your partner bit. Dave, it has a massive ick factor to me also, but I can't find a moral issue in there.

08-29-2007, 06:12 AM	#6
Godless Dave Contributor Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: With 10,000 lakes who needs a coast? Posts: 10,762	Many people have pretty specific wishes for what happens to their body after they die. I imagine there are some people who want it to be fucked. I suppose in such cases it might not be immoral for people to fuck those dead bodies. But I would still object, for the same reason I object to consensual sibling incest - eww. I think there's a chance, however slim, that my brain might have this eww response for long-forgotten evolutionary reasons. Normally that wouldn't be enough for me to go by, but there are a few special cases where eww factor is strong enough for me to make an exception.

08-29-2007, 06:18 AM	#8
Christina Mirabilis Banned Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 5,676	I think that Dave just brought up an interesting point. If the original owner had specific wishes about how their remains were to be handled, is it immoral to go against those wishes? (Not that I can imagine someone specifiying 'and please don't fuck me when I'm gone").

08-29-2007, 06:25 AM	#9
David B Contributor Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Wales Posts: 11,620	Aren't all these sadism, necrophilia and bestiality threads flogging a dead horse? David B (once heard of someone who ysed to be into necrophilia, until some rotten cunt split on him)

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.