Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
09-15-2005, 04:42 AM | #51 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Posts: 17,432
|
Quote:
|
|
09-15-2005, 05:54 AM | #52 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Folding@Home in upstate NY
Posts: 14,394
|
First off, here's the HNN story on the same.
Second, I agree that the timing could have been better. After the '06 Congressional elections, for instance. Further, not only is uG a "johnny come lately", I'm pretty sure that if Rev Francis Bellamy had thought it appropriate to mention God, he would have done so when he authored the PoA! Finally, some of you are talking about polls — where are the links, please? eta: Here's the link for the Lou Dobbs poll which, as I write this after having voted myself, stands at 5,158-3,402 (a 60/40 split) agreeing that uG renders the PoA unConstitutional! :thumbs: |
09-15-2005, 06:33 AM | #53 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 810
|
Quote:
ha ha, I will go on record right now as saying that there will NEVER be another constitutional amendment EVER. It's just too hard to get people to agree on anything these days. I would like to see some other groups join into the "under God" fight from a religious background, like the VA case, though. Good for public opinion. I honestly can't understand how people just don't see the violation here... It'd be like saying.."Oh, I know we said we wouldn't use the color blue in the flag, but the blue in the flag isn't really blue, it's just green without the yellow." |
|
09-15-2005, 06:49 AM | #54 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Atlanta, in the 99%
Posts: 873
|
Quote:
|
|
09-15-2005, 06:49 AM | #55 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 356
|
Quote:
The Same thing with same sex marriage activists pushed too soon and as a result peoples overacted and voted against same sex marriage proposals and reelcted George Bush. People werent ready for it. I think those unnessary lawsuits will do more harm than good. I am concerned that it will energize the right wingers in this country. |
|
09-15-2005, 08:07 AM | #56 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 2,520
|
Quote:
|
|
09-15-2005, 08:29 AM | #57 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 356
|
Quote:
|
|
09-15-2005, 08:42 AM | #58 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: where apologists for religion are deservedly derid
Posts: 6,298
|
I disagree. The longer we wait, the harder it becomes. Fight at every turn.
|
09-15-2005, 09:05 AM | #59 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kansas, USA
Posts: 126
|
To make a constitutional amendment would require 2/3 of the Congress, plus 3/4 of the states to ratify it. I don't think it could happen. This country is split 50/50, not 75/25.
So let's get the pledge fixed now, and not worry about an amendment. The civil rights cause got the laws changed first, then the people started realizing how bigoted they were being. And, yes, there are still plenty of bigots around - they just don't have the voice that they used to. This case is making the headlines. Many people are saying it's attacking religion, just leave well enough alone, etc. But, many people ("fence-sitters") are maybe looking at this, and thinking, hey, maybe this isn't right - maybe this should be changed. The seed needed to shift the paradigm has to be first sowed. |
09-15-2005, 09:06 AM | #60 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 2,520
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|