FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-09-2006, 05:01 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default On reading G. A. Wells

This is a question for those who have read G.A. Wells.

Are you annoyed by the constant appeals to authority in his arguments? Not usually for the argument itself, but for the supporting points of evidence.

I have five of his books, and I'm having trouble getting through one. I keep thinking, 'sure, X says this, but Y says otherwise!'

kind regards,
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 12-09-2006, 12:52 PM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Could you give an example? Is he referring to authority or consensus?
Toto is offline  
Old 12-09-2006, 09:17 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

Wells writes, "In the present volume I have drawn extensively on recent theological work, and my readers will be able to see whether I have thereby weakened my case." (Did Jesus Exist?, p. 5)

For example, "That angels or demons, and not human rulers are meant [in 1 Cor 2:8] is admitted by commentators..." (p. 19)

When looking for examples, it is not as frequent as I first had the impression, but the phenomenon is there. (I am only on page 21 or so of this book.)

kind regards,
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 12-10-2006, 01:24 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Kirby View Post
This is a question for those who have read G.A. Wells.

Are you annoyed by the constant appeals to authority in his arguments? Not usually for the argument itself, but for the supporting points of evidence.

I have five of his books, and I'm having trouble getting through one. I keep thinking, 'sure, X says this, but Y says otherwise!'
My impression is that he used such authorities to deflect the charge that it was all just the opinion of an amateur.
Steven Carr is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:14 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.