FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-27-2012, 10:23 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

According to the Gospel accounts Jesus was flogged shortly before his crucifixion. This would have reduced his life expectancy.

(If you take the Simon of Cyrene episode as history then it probably implies that Jesus was physically in a seriously weakened condition before he got to Golgotha.)

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 11-27-2012, 10:31 PM   #12
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Starting to get a tad disgruntled...
Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
My point was there's the trial and then his death back to back.
You mean with only a short number of hours between them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
Once you start moving the goalposts the more the uncertainty is about the reliability of the gospel narrative.
What goal posts? What reliability?

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
Let's not forget it was by no means settled that he suffered:

Quote:
He really, and not merely in appearance, was crucified, and died, in the sight of beings in heaven, and on earth, and under the earth. [Ignatius to the Romans long version]

But if, as some that are without God, that is, the unbelieving, say, He became man in appearance, that He did not in reality take unto Him a body, that He died in appearance, and did not in very deed suffer, then for what reason am I now in bonds, and long to be exposed to the wild beasts? [ibid]

He was crucified in reality, and not in appearance, not in imagination, not in deceit. He really died, and was buried, and rose from the dead, even as He prayed in a certain place, saying, "But do Thou, O Lord, raise me up again, and I shall recompense them." [ibid]

Now, He suffered all these things for us; and He suffered them really, and not in appearance only, even as also He truly rose again. But not, as some of the unbelievers, who are ashamed of the formation of man, and the cross, and death itself, affirm, that in appearance only, and not in truth, He took a body of the Virgin, and suffered only in appearance, forgetting, as they do, Him who said, "The Word was made flesh; " [to the Smyrnaeans]

For if the Lord were in the body in appearance only, and were crucified in appearance only, then am I also bound in appearance only. And why have I also surrendered myself to death, to fire, to the sword, to the wild beasts? But, I endure all things for Christ, not in appearance only, but in reality, that I may suffer together with Him, while He Himself inwardly strengthens me [ibid]

I have learned that certain of the ministers of Satan have wished to disturb you, some of them asserting that Jesus was born in appearance, was crucified in appearance, and died in appearance; others that He is not the Son the Creator, and others that He is Himself God over all. [to the Tarsians]

Wherefore, also, he works in some that they should deny the cross, be ashamed of the passion, call the death an appearance, mutilate and explain away the birth of the Virgin, and calumniate the [human] nature itself as being abominable. He fights along with the Jews to a denial of the cross, and with the Gentiles to the calumniating of Mary, who are heretical in holding that Christ possessed a mere phantasmal body ... For if the Lord were a mere man, possessed of a soul and body only, why do you mutilate and explain away His being born with the common nature of humanity? Why do you call the passion a mere appearance, as if it were any strange thing happening to a [mere] man? And why do you reckon the death of a mortal to be simply an imaginary death? [to the Philippians]
I'm at a loss to explain why you cited any of these. They only show a conflict between seemers and realers from the latter's perspective. Your back to back stuff doesn't get a look in.

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
The point is that the two should be taken together - the quick death and the strong tradition the quick death means that it was only in appearance.
I got that the first time. My comment was that I can speculate just as meaningfully. (Note irony here.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
Pilate had been surprised at the speed of death, so wanted it verified. It's as central to the narrative as the Passover.
And this reaction from Pilate is narrative indication that the death is to be perceived as real.

What's going on?
spin is offline  
Old 11-28-2012, 12:24 AM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

spin,

Clearly (a) the citations are meant to point to an interpretation of a text (b) this tradition thought that Jesus appeared human but was not human so Pilate would have presumably believed that Jesus was an ordinary man but was nevertheless surprised that Jesus couldn't take the punishment an ordinary man could take (i.e. lasting longer than a few hours). It's like you size up a woman at a bar and she turns out to be different than you expect or this restaurant near my house:



The 'pizza' part of the sign is difficult to read high up on a sign so I thought I could get souvlaki and was disappointed.
stephan huller is offline  
Old 11-28-2012, 12:32 AM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Quote:
According to the Gospel accounts Jesus was flogged shortly before his crucifixion.
Quote:
Wanting to satisfy the crowd, Pilate released Barabbas to them. He had Jesus flogged, and handed him over to be crucified. The soldiers led Jesus away into the palace (that is, the Praetorium) and called together the whole company of soldiers. 17 They put a purple robe on him, then twisted together a crown of thorns and set it on him. 18 And they began to call out to him, “Hail, king of the Jews!” 19 Again and again they struck him on the head with a staff and spit on him. Falling on their knees, they paid homage to him. 20 And when they had mocked him, they took off the purple robe and put his own clothes on him. Then they led him out to crucify him.
This would not cause an able bodied man to expire so quickly on the Cross. Celsus's Jew makes the same point. Perhaps this is why Pilate is so surprised (Mark 15:44) by the news. I would at least like people to admit it is the strongest argument for a supernatural Jesus.
stephan huller is offline  
Old 11-28-2012, 12:38 AM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

I am going to cite the whole section so people who aren't as familiar with this material can see there is nothing here:

Quote:
15 Wanting to satisfy the crowd, Pilate released Barabbas to them. He had Jesus flogged, and handed him over to be crucified.

16 The soldiers led Jesus away into the palace (that is, the Praetorium) and called together the whole company of soldiers. 17 They put a purple robe on him, then twisted together a crown of thorns and set it on him. 18 And they began to call out to him, “Hail, king of the Jews!” 19 Again and again they struck him on the head with a staff and spit on him. Falling on their knees, they paid homage to him. 20 And when they had mocked him, they took off the purple robe and put his own clothes on him. Then they led him out to crucify him.

21 A certain man from Cyrene, Simon, the father of Alexander and Rufus, was passing by on his way in from the country, and they forced him to carry the cross. 22 They brought Jesus to the place called Golgotha (which means “the place of the skull”). 23 Then they offered him wine mixed with myrrh, but he did not take it. 24 And they crucified him. Dividing up his clothes, they cast lots to see what each would get.

25 It was nine in the morning when they crucified him. 26 The written notice of the charge against him read: the king of the jews.

27 They crucified two rebels with him, one on his right and one on his left. [28] [a] 29 Those who passed by hurled insults at him, shaking their heads and saying, “So! You who are going to destroy the temple and build it in three days, 30 come down from the cross and save yourself!” 31 In the same way the chief priests and the teachers of the law mocked him among themselves. “He saved others,” they said, “but he can’t save himself! 32 Let this Messiah, this king of Israel, come down now from the cross, that we may see and believe.” Those crucified with him also heaped insults on him.

33 At noon, darkness came over the whole land until three in the afternoon. 34 And at three in the afternoon Jesus cried out in a loud voice, “Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachthani?” (which means “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?”).[b]

35 When some of those standing near heard this, they said, “Listen, he’s calling Elijah.”

36 Someone ran, filled a sponge with wine vinegar, put it on a staff, and offered it to Jesus to drink. “Now leave him alone. Let’s see if Elijah comes to take him down,” he said.

37 With a loud cry, Jesus breathed his last.

38 The curtain of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom. 39 And when the centurion, who stood there in front of Jesus, saw how he died, he said, “Surely this man was the Son of God!”

40 Some women were watching from a distance. Among them were Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James the younger and of Joseph,[d] and Salome. 41 In Galilee these women had followed him and cared for his needs. Many other women who had come up with him to Jerusalem were also there.

42 It was Preparation Day (that is, the day before the Sabbath). So as evening approached, 43 Joseph of Arimathea, a prominent member of the Council, who was himself waiting for the kingdom of God, went boldly to Pilate and asked for Jesus’ body. 44 Pilate was surprised to hear that he was already dead. Summoning the centurion, he asked him if Jesus had already died.
Six hours? Really? This isn't meant to raise eyes?
stephan huller is offline  
Old 11-28-2012, 01:04 AM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

I forgot to mention that the 'third hour' is certainly a mistake. Origen for instance calculates it to have been a three hour death - from the sixth to the ninth hour (Commentary on Matthew 5. 140) miraculum, quoniam post tres horas receptus est. Here is the whole passage:

"Since those crucified persons who are not stabbed, suffer greater torment, and survive in great pain, sometimes the whole of the following night, and even the whole of the next day ; and since Jesus was not stabbed, and his enemies hoped that by his hanging long upon the cross he would suffer the greater torment, he prayed to the Father and was heard, and as soon as he had called was taken to the Father ; or else, as one who had the power of laying down his life, he laid it down when he chose. This prodigy astonished the centurion, who said — ' Truly this man was a son of God.' — For it was a miracle that he who would otherwise perhaps have survived two days on the cross, according to the custom of those who are crucified but not stabbed, should have been taken up after three hours, so that his death seems to have happened by the favour of God, and rather through the merit of his own prayer than through the violence of the cross."
stephan huller is offline  
Old 11-28-2012, 01:11 AM   #17
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Quote:
The entire Bible
Including which bits of Apocrypha?

And has anyone argued that part of the editing process was to bring out time and mathematical elements? Or is this later kabbalistic thinking because of the Hebrew use of letters and numbers?

Quote:
23 Then they offered him wine mixed with myrrh, but he did not take it
Quote:
36 Someone ran, filled a sponge with wine vinegar, put it on a staff, and offered it to Jesus to drink.
The references in the gospels to alcohol might be worth another look as well...
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 11-28-2012, 01:14 AM   #18
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Quote:
And they crucified him. Dividing up his clothes, they cast lots to see what each would get.
Two more geometric/mathematical references - the cross - and casting lots.
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 11-28-2012, 01:28 AM   #19
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

If we look seriously at what we have with these documents, it might lead to some interesting conclusions.

From at the latest in the 300's the entire weight and experience of the Roman Empire was involved in the production and editing of these documents, there have been arguments that this involvement is from around the time of the crossing of the Rubicon.

We are looking at an Empire that has the huge experience of the Egyptian ways of thinking, oriental cults and very early alchemy, a continual feeding of ideas from Persia and China, the wealth of the Library of Alexandria, the technology of the Ankylethera Mechanism, and Archimedes having cracked calculus.

A story of god becoming man and ushering in a new heaven and earth fits exactly the time and place. As Deepak Chopra talks of quantum this and that, gospels that do similar are predictable!
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 11-28-2012, 03:51 AM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

Two decades plus ago, I spent months making a very detailed chart with individual boxes accounting for every single hour for the first fifteen weeks of that year. With each identifiable Gospel event carefully placed in its only possible location, likewise I did the same for each of the 'Old Testament' verses that had established the pattern for these things. (Passover, Pentecost etc.)
I at that time attended a congregation that was diligent about observing The annual Sabbaths of YHWH. And with this hands on personal participation in the yearly reenactments, with careful attention to the time and timing, The exercise proved to be very educational and rewarding.
I spent more than a decade and thousands of hours working with it, eventually leading to a good grasp of how the ancient Hebrew system of linear measures worked, and upon what invariable and unchanging principals they were based.

Of course as these things tend to go, what I found out proved to be against everyones religious beliefs, cultural norms and existing paradigms.
I was 'looking around a corner' that no one on the 'inside of the box' could ever see.
So all I can do is to know of my own long labors, sleepless nights, countless hundreds of thousands of calculations, and my own integrity in the matter. Witness to its existence through my remaining years, and patiently wait for others to finally come to some measure of knowledge and appreciation.

From time to time I do still make attempts to lead other honest and truth seeking individuals to investigate these things. Thirty years and more now have passed, that I have known what I know, but have never heard from anyone that had walked in that path.
Perhaps men will understand in a hundred years, ..or maybe it will take another thousand -I do not know, but I do know that it has been worth my effort, No man in their ignorance will ever deprive me.
Sheshbazzar is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:58 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.