FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-01-2006, 07:17 AM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic
You are not trying to learn anything at all about the tangible secrets of the universe, and you are not trying to convince anyone of anything factual. You just treat the Secular Web like a coffee shop as a means of preventing you from getting bored.
No they cannot be harmonized GENETICALLY because Mary doesn't have any genes to pass on. Luke only tells us that it was supposed that Jesus was the son of Joseph to tell you that he was not, in fact, the son of Joseph.

Matthew tells us in a round about way that Jesus was not the messiah because it was [only] said that he was the messiah.

The bible does these kinds of things to lead believers by the nose so they have something to talk about while they are looking in the wrong direction and will have something to complain about when their universe seems complicated and mysterious (while all you have to do is read carefully or not at all if it doesn't make sense to you = not prior to you).
Chili is offline  
Old 02-01-2006, 09:33 AM   #2
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default Two different genealogies of Jesus

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
No they cannot be harmonized GENETICALLY because Mary doesn't have any genes to pass on.
Then you don't have any geneaology and genes to pass on either, right?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
Luke only tells us that "it was supposed" that Jesus was the son of Joseph to tell you that he was not, in fact, the son of Joseph.
And that is news to whom? The very first page in the New Testament says that Jesus would be conceived by Holy Spirit.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
Matthew tells us in a round about way that Jesus was not the messiah because "it was only said that he was the messiah."
That is false. Matthew 1:21 says "And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name Jesus: for he shall save his people from their sins."

John 3:16 says "For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but has everlasting life."
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 02-01-2006, 06:02 PM   #3
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic
Then you don't have any geneaology and genes to pass on either, right?
Wrong, I am not Mary but Mary is mine. I know that this doesn't make sense to you but if I am right how can Mary have genes?
Quote:

And that is news to whom? The very first page in the New Testament says that Jesus would be conceived by Holy Spirit.
It does not say that Jesus would be conceived but that Mary has conceived this child by the Holy Spirit and that Joseph was to call him Jesus.

Holy spirit with genes?
Quote:

That is false. Matthew 1:21 says "And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name Jesus: for he shall save his people from their sins."
John 3:16 says "For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but has everlasting life."
His people were to be those who believed in this messiah and their sins would be those inflicted by Jewish law to date. The New Testament will have its own set of laws and this excludes Jewish law . . . as it should because Catholics cannot be crucified on two crosses at once. We just retained the Ten Commandments and added some of our own that you probably do not know about and these are to do the trick for us. In case you wonder what this means, Johnny, the concept sin is an illusion but is needed to redeem our benevolent prior nature.

Let's not bring John 3:16 in here because to believe is to 'be lief' is to 'be willing' by faith only and that is contrary to a rational belief in this passage that should never be cited on account of what it means to believe. So as soon as I see you flash this passage I already know that you've been fed to the wolves.

ETA "Fed to the wolves" is a twist on "devoured by the wolves in sheeps clothing."
Chili is offline  
Old 02-01-2006, 07:24 PM   #4
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default The genealogy of Jesus

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
No they cannot be harmonized GENETICALLY because Mary doesn't have any genes to pass on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnySkeptic
Then you don't have any geneaology and genes to pass on either, right?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
Wrong, I am not Mary but Mary is mine.
No she isn't. She is not your wife, and you are not her genetic descendant.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
I know that this doesn't make sense to you but if I am right how can Mary have genes?
Actually, it doesn't make sense to anyone, including you. You just come up with this stuff for entertainment. Obviously, if Mary was human, she had genes.
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 02-01-2006, 07:27 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Providence, Rhode Island
Posts: 4,389
Default

Johnny. We don't know each other, but I admire your intellectual abilities. My question, and please do delete this, moderators, is why do you entertain the ramblings of somebody like Chili? It's okay. We know you're very smart. Chili is not a threat to you or anyone. Just ignore him, he obviously makes no coherent sense to you (or anyone, as you pointed out). Think bandwith!
PyramidHead is offline  
Old 02-01-2006, 07:35 PM   #6
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default The genealogy of Jesus

Quote:
Originally Posted by PyramidHead
Johnny, we don't know each other, but I admire your intellectual abilities.
Thank you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PyramidHead
My question, and please do delete this, moderators, is why do you entertain the ramblings of somebody like Chili? It's okay. We know you're very smart. Chili is not a threat to you or anyone. Just ignore him, he obviously makes no coherent sense to you (or anyone, as you pointed out).
I had already decided a few minutes ago that I am not going to reply to any more of Chili's posts.
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 02-01-2006, 08:42 PM   #7
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PyramidHead
Johnny. We don't know each other, but I admire your intellectual abilities. My question, and please do delete this, moderators, is why do you entertain the ramblings of somebody like Chili? It's okay. We know you're very smart. Chili is not a threat to you or anyone. Just ignore him, he obviously makes no coherent sense to you (or anyone, as you pointed out). Think bandwith!
I do not know Johnny either and I, too, am impressed by his intelligence to fall in line with millions of others who have argued over this lineage for 2000 years with no new insight gained. Nothing has changed and the lineages that are given still serve their purpose.

Let me suggest that bandwith means nothing if your salvation is at risk. Ask Johnny, he was been studying the bible for 35 years and is now taking a different approach.
Chili is offline  
Old 02-01-2006, 08:43 PM   #8
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic
Thank you.



I had already decided a few minutes ago that I am not going to reply to any more of Chili's posts.
That's to bad, I will miss you. Farewell Johnny.
Chili is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:33 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.