Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
11-07-2008, 12:26 PM | #1 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 106
|
Leviticus 27?
Not sure if this is the right forum for this, but seemed like the best option.
I was wondering if anyone knew what the first handful of verses in Leviticus 27 is actually talking about. I've mentioned this passage to various Christian acquaintances of mine, pointing out the ageism and sexism inherent in the passage. I keep getting told that it only seems that way because I don't understand the passage. Of course, they haven't been able give me an explanation that made sense. Honestly, this passage has always been a bit opaque to me. I have no idea what's going on beyond the obvious placement of value on humans. Has anyone heard a reason for why a value was being placed on people to begin with? For easy reference, here's the passage in question Quote:
|
|
11-07-2008, 12:33 PM | #2 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pittsfield, Mass
Posts: 24,500
|
Quote:
Someone over a certain was perceived as a greater drain than contributor. Children under a certain age cannot tend goats or hoe weeds, so cannot contribute. They're a drain for quite a while, so the tithe does not add an unfair fee on top of that. Until they're able to contribute. Total working number of hands available to whoever is 'making the vow' for those hands is the tax base. The US system is more precise. Amount of salary brought in, minus a specific credit for each of your dependents, is the basic tax you owe. But it's largely the same thing, this just assumes that if you have 5 healthy sons, you can till more ground than the guy with 5 healthy daughters. |
|
11-07-2008, 01:28 PM | #3 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 106
|
I'm afraid I still don't get it. What exactly is the "vow?" Who pays the money and to whom? And how often?
If I'm understanding you, Keith (and I'm probably not), it seems like it's the head of the household, or perhaps a "boss" that's making the payment when he takes a group of people away from general service to the community. Is that close to what you were saying? |
11-07-2008, 02:19 PM | #4 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 197
|
What we have here is basically a scam. These are a set of rules/guidelines describing how individuals may pay their dues to the temple. The idea that people owe dues in the first place is tied to the basic notion of sacrifice that the priests who speak to YHWH behind closed doors claim he demands.
Curiously the passage starts by addressing people who are to be "devoted to YHWH". The earliest instances of this verbage refer to direct sacrifice of animals. Passages in Exodus seem to extend the idea of devoting the first born to people as well. Some speculate this went on in ancient Israel and the oft found condemnation of it as evidence. It's hard though to extend this to the time of Leviticus, so here people being "devoted to YHWH" probably means something else, maybe some sort of service to the temple. This perhaps agrees with the idea of giving cash instead of time. Further into the chapter animals and fields of grain are also addressed. At the end of the day what you have is an institution claiming to represent an invisible spirit telling people that if they donate money we'll make sure you stay blessed and prosperous. Of course if anything bad did happen, they blamed the people anyway for not being faithful enough. (i.e., giving/sacrificing, worshiping other gods, behaving poorly, etc...) Gives a whole new twist to "Thou shall have no other gods before me." as another way of saying, give us all your money, don't give it to the other (competing) temples. |
11-07-2008, 02:32 PM | #5 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pittsfield, Mass
Posts: 24,500
|
Quote:
It would be, perhaps, the patriarch of a family farm, or a city craftsman. One pays to the church based on how many people he has available to till the lands he owns, to tend the flock, to draw water, the run the privately own used-chariot dealership, all of which produces an income, part of which goes to the church. A silversmith might pay for himself, his family, and any apprentices he has underfoot. They work the shop, collect wood for the furnace, make the tools, deal with customers and deliver goods to the consumers. The number of workers is proportional to the amount of work he can do, which connects to the amount of money he can make. Anyone in a situation that cannot support the standard tithe can present their case and get a different valuation. |
|
11-07-2008, 02:34 PM | #6 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pittsfield, Mass
Posts: 24,500
|
Quote:
Real noice, Jephas. Real noice. Yeah. We was jus' talkin' about your soul, brudder. it'd be a shame if sumpin' were to...happen to it. Know whadda mean? |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|