mung bean

Unfortunately Dave will be able to say it is not pre-Flud because according to his sources the ice age was post-Flud. Ergo the English Channel was also carved post-Flud.

I now predict that Dave will drop into this thread and post a comment along the lines of "yeah, you're wrong CM so there", and then promptly disappear again without dealing with any of the outstanding questions in this thread.
He has no answers but will not admit defeat, so the vanishing act is his only option.

Constant Mews

According to Dave, the English Channel is a flood-artifact, so it cannot be that this village is post-flood but pre-ice-age.

mung bean

Hmmm. I know he has orgasms about the Channel being formed "catastrophically" but that's not necessarily the same thing as it being a Flud artifact. There's floods and then there's Teh Flud. If it was formed as a result of an ice dam collapsing it would have to be formed during the ice age.

Occam's Aftershave

Dave, if you're done with your cowardly evasions from the feathers/scales diversion and the Walt Brown nonsense, could you please come back here and explain

Where the fuck is that 1 mi. deep layer of Flood sediment in Egypt that you kept running your mouth about?

Pappy Jack

I rather think Dave has abandoned this thread entirely, along with a couple of others (YEC Population Projections and Patriarchs' Ages) so maybe a technical KO can be claimed?