FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-13-2008, 08:22 AM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default Chile on the Resurrection split

Quote:
Originally Posted by Switch89 View Post
I have been looking into the arguments concerning Jesus' resurrection and would like to know if there is anything online that covers most or all of the arguments for it.

I am particularly interested in rebuttals to the following:

1) Why was it recorded that the women were the ones to discover the empty tomb, while the men hid in fear of the Romans?

2) How do we explain the Apostles thinking that the tomb was empty, that Jesus appeared to them, etc.? Why were they so willing to spread the word?
For what it is worth:

The women preside over the TOL (Mary) and the TOK (Magdalene) and know first hand that the tomb was empty because Jesus doesn't move no more. This is based on Genesis 3:15 where there was emnity between these two serpents ("emnity between you and the woman and between your offspring and hers"), from where Mary strikes at the head of Magdalene (the temple tramp) who in turn strikes at the heel of Jesus (the fucker) to make him move by way of desire as vagrant without a mind of his own while outside of Eden and is here now trying to return to Eden as Galilean.

The crucifixion had impaired the senses and the bleeding of blood and water removed all conscious (blood) and intuit (water) desire to bring peace in the mind of Jesus and subsequently between the offspring of the woman and the offspring of Magdalene (between ancient Rome and this generation Jew) who so could be added to the wardrobe of Mary as richess in heaven now joyfully hers. Effectively this is how Magdalene is taken under the care of John as reported by Luke where her offspring proclaims the praises of God [as the beauty of truth] in Jerusalem. In the raw these praises echo the perpetual hum of virgins wherein beauty finds existence in all aspects of life.
Chili is offline  
Old 09-13-2008, 10:10 AM   #2
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Agenda07 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Switch89 View Post
I have been looking into the arguments concerning Jesus' resurrection and would like to know if there is anything online that covers most or all of the arguments for it.

I am particularly interested in rebuttals to the following:

1) Why was it recorded that the women were the ones to discover the empty tomb, while the men hid in fear of the Romans?
Two thoughts:

Firstly, in the Gospels Jesus frequently hangs out with those who were looked down upon in Jewish society at the time (lepers, the insane, Romans, Samaritans, women etc.) so appearing to women first rather than an upstanding Jewish man could be considered the natural narrative progression.

Secondly, if the author of Mark was pro-Paul and anti-Peter et al. (as the textual evidence suggests they may have been) then what better way to undermine the authority of the apostles than to write them out of the most important part of the story (at least at first)?

The apostles once were the shepherds out herding sheep when Christ was born and here now are passified to be raised as richess in heaven only . . . lest Jesus not be raised but return to Galilee instead as Matthew has it.
Chili is offline  
Old 09-15-2008, 11:19 AM   #3
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

They were eager to spread the word only in Matthew where Jesus returned to Galilee before the third day which is exactly what the Chief Priest did not want. In Matthew "the angel of the Lord" appeared to them who is the "angel of light" and not the "true light" as Jesus said he was in John 1. This would then be how Jesus becomes the final imposter in Matthew who is much worse than the first and will spend the rest of his days trying to work out his own salvation and in the end die nonetheless.

Conclusion: Matthew describes the rising action and crisis moment of the most basic of all human rights called salvation (because it is native to man) that without resurrection becomes a tragedy wherein nothing was divine and therefore is called a Senecan Tragedy. This event must be compared with Luke's Divine Comedy wherein resurrection follows the crisis moment and the "great commision" is not.

So now my perpetual hum if virgins that is suposed to be transformed into the actual presence of Beauty to provide eternal bliss (only Beauty and Truth are real) is warped by Matthew into the fire of hell that prevails until the second death of body and soul while still on earth.
Chili is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:57 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.