Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
View Poll Results: what was the origins of jc/christianity | |||
JC was the Son of God | 4 | 6.45% | |
JC was a wonderworker and sage | 0 | 0% | |
JC was a revolutionary, socially & or religious, peaceful or violent | 5 | 8.06% | |
JC was a PIWA, [preaching itinerant Jewish apocalypticist | 23 | 37.10% | |
JC was the title of the leader/leaders of a Jewish messianic sect [i.e Essene or other group] | 3 | 4.84% | |
He was a MJ of a Greek/Judean hybred fertility/solar cult | 3 | 4.84% | |
an MJ within a hybred of Greek/Judean platonic/logos philosophy | 6 | 9.68% | |
a MJ of a Greek/Judean mystery cult [a.k.a sublunar god] | 11 | 17.74% | |
the MJ was a symbol of a revolutionary political/social movement | 0 | 0% | |
JC was a literary device in political satire and a roman invention [dating from the 1st to 3rd C] | 7 | 11.29% | |
Voters: 62. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
11-25-2007, 02:54 PM | #11 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,607
|
I voted for number 3 (under the assumption that he actually existed, which may not be so).
|
11-25-2007, 04:32 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 740
|
Mine, too. He might be called a "revolutionary," but I think that term overstates the impact he has on his own generation. "Preacher" sounds more appropriate. However, I'm not convinced he was an itinerant, nor that his preaching was wholly apocalyptic. Even so, PIWA is closest to what I think about him, given the list above.
|
11-25-2007, 05:29 PM | #13 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: migrant worker, US
Posts: 2,845
|
you left out "PITA" -- as in, royal PITA.
|
11-25-2007, 06:23 PM | #14 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 46
|
I selected PIWA as well although I agree with others and a "Not enough evidence to tell either way" option was needed
|
11-26-2007, 01:11 AM | #15 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: .
Posts: 1,014
|
Quote:
I have to admit thought that I am pretty agnostic between this position and the completely MJ but tend to think that PERHAPS the messianic preacher or group of preachers (not that I think they were organized as such by the way,althought that would be an interesting concept ) seems the most reasonable position to take. |
|
11-26-2007, 07:38 AM | #16 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 3,210
|
I voted for "mystery cult" as it's the closest to what I think, but it's kind of misleading. What I really think is that he was originally a revision of the very concept of the Messiah itself, in a way that lent itself to becoming something like a Jewish version of a mystery cult (from what we know of them, which isn't much) - i.e. a sort of private relationship with a deity - in a social context that stands apart from the normal social religious forms that are to do with furthering the well being of the community - that grants salvation to the individual.
|
11-26-2007, 11:15 AM | #17 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
Amalgam of Roman literary figure and mythical elements?
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|