FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-23-2011, 10:25 AM   #21
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Gone
Posts: 4,676
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Pearse View Post
(Deleted on second thoughts)
Your Lord was maliciously insulted in the worst possible way and yet you managed to behave yourself. Good for you.
Yellum Notnef is offline  
Old 11-23-2011, 10:56 AM   #22
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scotsguy44 View Post
...Even if it was granted arguendo that the whole of the gospels are a fiction the point would remain that in that fiction there is textual precedent for people to die and be resurrected back to who they were (the same person) and not a different person.

Thanks
Matt
Your Logic is extremely FAULTY.

Once you POSTULATE the whole Gospels are FICTION then all claims in the Gospels that people died and resurrected are TOTAL Fiction and have ZERO historical value or precedent.

Once you POSTULATE the whole Gospels are FICTION then the claim by Paul that Jesus died for our Sins is ABSOLUTE Fiction.

I will soon Postulate that Jesus was NOT human as stated in Galatians 1.1 and we will see if we get the same result.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 11-23-2011, 12:39 PM   #23
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Scotland
Posts: 59
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scotsguy44 View Post
...Even if it was granted arguendo that the whole of the gospels are a fiction the point would remain that in that fiction there is textual precedent for people to die and be resurrected back to who they were (the same person) and not a different person.

Thanks
Matt
Your Logic is extremely FAULTY.

Once you POSTULATE the whole Gospels are FICTION then all claims in the Gospels that people died and resurrected are TOTAL Fiction and have ZERO historical value or precedent.

Once you POSTULATE the whole Gospels are FICTION then the claim by Paul that Jesus died for our Sins is ABSOLUTE Fiction.

I will soon Postulate that Jesus was NOT human as stated in Galatians 1.1 and we will see if we get the same result.
I don't seem to have explained myself too well. What I mean is this: `

1. We assume for the sake of argument that we are reading absolute fiction in the Gospels.
2. In reading that absolute fiction in the Gospels we read of fictional accounts of fictional people who are fictionally raised from the dead but remain as the same fictional persons as they were previously.
3. Therefore we have in those fictional accounts fictional precedent that fictional persons such as Jesus can fictionally rise from the dead yet be the same fictional person as he was in his fictional identity before his fictional death.

That seems to me as logically valid?

Thanks
Matt
Scotsguy44 is offline  
Old 11-23-2011, 02:40 PM   #24
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scotsguy44 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scotsguy44 View Post
...Even if it was granted arguendo that the whole of the gospels are a fiction the point would remain that in that fiction there is textual precedent for people to die and be resurrected back to who they were (the same person) and not a different person.

Thanks
Matt
Your Logic is extremely FAULTY.

Once you POSTULATE the whole Gospels are FICTION then all claims in the Gospels that people died and resurrected are TOTAL Fiction and have ZERO historical value or precedent.

Once you POSTULATE the whole Gospels are FICTION then the claim by Paul that Jesus died for our Sins is ABSOLUTE Fiction.

I will soon Postulate that Jesus was NOT human as stated in Galatians 1.1 and we will see if we get the same result.
I don't seem to have explained myself too well. What I mean is this: `

1. We assume for the sake of argument that we are reading absolute fiction in the Gospels.
2. In reading that absolute fiction in the Gospels we read of fictional accounts of fictional people who are fictionally raised from the dead but remain as the same fictional persons as they were previously.
3. Therefore we have in those fictional accounts fictional precedent that fictional persons such as Jesus can fictionally rise from the dead yet be the same fictional person as he was in his fictional identity before his fictional death.

That seems to me as logically valid?

Thanks
Matt
I have already answered your question.

Please review my previous post. Your logic is extremely faulty.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 11-23-2011, 06:55 PM   #25
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scotsguy44
Lazarus was a human raised from death to life by Jesus (as was the daughter of Jairus) so there is precedent in the Gospels for humans being raised from the dead to life and that -those persons were not different humans from who they were previously.
May not have been different bodies. But it is highly questionable whether they were any longer human.

By all medical and scientific experience and knowledge, the human brain suffers permanent and irreversible brain damage, followed by brain-death, if deprived of blood-flow and life giving oxygen for only a few minutes at normal temperatures. Death may occur within as little as three to five minutes.

What would be the condition of the brain of cadaver that was four days dead, and without any medical interventions at all?

Lazarus, we are told, came forth from his grave after being dead for four days.
(the text emphasizes that Lazarus was really dead dead, and not just appearing to be dead)

What the story never tells us however, is whether this walking cadaver called Lazarus had any brain function, or was in any mental or medical sense any longer a human.
The only further reference directly to Lazarus has him sitting at a table. (Jhn 12:2)
What it doesn't tell us is whether this zombie thing called Lazarus was even conscious.
Was 'Lazarus' now a drooling idiot?
Did they need to prop this zombie thing up? or tie it to a chair?
Was 'Lazarus' just staring vacantly into the air? Was he even breathing?
Did this thing called Lazarus now only mutter; 'braaains... braaaines....b-b-braaains' ???

Yes, there is precedent in the Gospels for humans being raised from the dead to life.
And one might well wonder how many days, weeks, months, or years those dead zombie saints had lain in their tombs stewing in the juices of their decomposition before they clawed their way out following the Cruci-fiction? (Matt 27:52-53)
Think they simply took up living their old normal human lives again? perhaps even grabbed back everything that had been divided between their children upon their deaths? Or perhaps got in a little more of the old boom-boom with their former (possibly remarried) mates? -that is if their members hadn't already rotted off.

Then there is Zombie Jeebus himself, a guy once deader than a door-nail, now up and out schlepping about in a carcase that is riddled with holes- one being big enough to stuff a hand through, -perhaps even grab a handful of ropey intestines or liver-
And as though that isn't enough, this gruesome thing is able to teleport about and shape-shift at will, but we are supposed to accept that this grotesque yet all-powerful, reality controlling and distorting, THING is human and even feel sorry for it?

But there is more! Unless we are willing to spend the rest of our entire human life-times in groveling before it, drinking its blood and eating its flesh, it threatens to likewise raise us up out of our graves and make us to live forever so that it can enjoy having us tortured and burned on and on for all of eternity.
Because.....ta da! It just loves us so much!

Freddy Krueger is a sweet little choirboy alongside Zombie Jeebus thing.
Hell, it would make more sense to worship Freddy Krueger than this horrid monstrosity.
At least with Freddy when he is done with you, you are -thankfully- dead.

I seriously doubt one could come up with a worse or more evil monster than old living-dead Zombie Jeebus.

I ain't afraid of this stupid and insane religion invented boogy-man, and I sure as hell ain't going to worship it nor support any of its already brain-dead preachers.





.
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 11-23-2011, 08:06 PM   #26
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scotsguy44 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLDMAN View Post
At first they didn't realize it was Jesus. This happens twice if I'm not mistaken?
Yes
It also happens twice in the NHC 6.1 "The Acts of Peter and the Twelve Apostles".


Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post

Lazarus, we are told, came forth from his grave after being dead for four days.
(the text emphasizes that Lazarus was really dead dead, and not just appearing to be dead)
Wasn't he summoned forth by an irresistable power?
mountainman is offline  
Old 11-23-2011, 08:42 PM   #27
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

A puppet on a string.
Lazarus's free-will (if he ever had any in the first place) forever ended at his death.
Zombie Jeebus Gob took over total control. Poor old Lazarus cadaver was now nothing but an empty husk for the Zombie Jeebus parasite to 'fill', inhabit, and use to further spread the deadly ZJBD virus.
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 11-23-2011, 09:15 PM   #28
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 6,010
Default just fiction will do

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
In the Pauline writings it is claimed Jesus died for our sins.

Romans 5:8
Quote:
But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us...
1Corinthians 15:3 -

Well, the Pauline writer must be Lying because he did state Jesus SURVIVED the Crucifixion.

He and OVER 500 people WITNESSED Jesus ALIVE.

If Paul is truthful that he and OVER 500 people AT ONCE saw Jesus ALIVE then Jesus did NOT die for our sins at the time Paul made the claim.

Paul should have spoken the truth.

Jesus was NOT really dead.

If Jesus was a real human being then he did NOT die he simply survived the Crucifixion.

1 Corinthians 15

People knew Jesus was NOT dead based on Paul. The very same Paul WITNESSED Jesus alive AFTER his crucifixion.

We know it is possible to survive a crucifixion from the writings of Josephus.

Life of Flavius Josephus

It is documented that a crucified person did survive a crucifixion.

The claim that Jesus died for our sins AFTER he was crucified MUST be FALSE once Paul, the disciples and OVER 500 people SAW Jesus alive.

It is ABSOLUTE Fiction that Jesus died for our sins based on the Pauline writings.

1 Corinthians 15
Quote:
....... he rose again the third day according to the scriptures........ And last of all he was seen of me also...
When Paul wrote his epistle to the Corinthians Jesus may have been still ALIVE.

There is ZERO record of the death of Jesus in the NT AFTER he survived the crucifixion.

The claim that Jesus died for our sins is ABSOLUTE Fiction.
Fiction, not absolute fiction. The word absolute adds nothing to the meaning of the word fiction. A story is either factual or fiction. Fiction or non-fiction.
Steve Weiss is offline  
Old 11-23-2011, 09:19 PM   #29
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 6,010
Default faulty or not

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scotsguy44 View Post

I don't seem to have explained myself too well. What I mean is this: `

1. We assume for the sake of argument that we are reading absolute fiction in the Gospels.
2. In reading that absolute fiction in the Gospels we read of fictional accounts of fictional people who are fictionally raised from the dead but remain as the same fictional persons as they were previously.
3. Therefore we have in those fictional accounts fictional precedent that fictional persons such as Jesus can fictionally rise from the dead yet be the same fictional person as he was in his fictional identity before his fictional death.

That seems to me as logically valid?

Thanks
Matt
I have already answered your question.

Please review my previous post. Your logic is extremely faulty.
The logic is either faulty or valid, not extremely faulty or hugely faulty or gigantically faulty.
Steve Weiss is offline  
Old 11-24-2011, 12:04 AM   #30
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Scotland
Posts: 59
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scotsguy44 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scotsguy44 View Post
...Even if it was granted arguendo that the whole of the gospels are a fiction the point would remain that in that fiction there is textual precedent for people to die and be resurrected back to who they were (the same person) and not a different person.

Thanks
Matt
Your Logic is extremely FAULTY.

Once you POSTULATE the whole Gospels are FICTION then all claims in the Gospels that people died and resurrected are TOTAL Fiction and have ZERO historical value or precedent.

Once you POSTULATE the whole Gospels are FICTION then the claim by Paul that Jesus died for our Sins is ABSOLUTE Fiction.

I will soon Postulate that Jesus was NOT human as stated in Galatians 1.1 and we will see if we get the same result.
I don't seem to have explained myself too well. What I mean is this: `

1. We assume for the sake of argument that we are reading absolute fiction in the Gospels.
2. In reading that absolute fiction in the Gospels we read of fictional accounts of fictional people who are fictionally raised from the dead but remain as the same fictional persons as they were previously.
3. Therefore we have in those fictional accounts fictional precedent that fictional persons such as Jesus can fictionally rise from the dead yet be the same fictional person as he was in his fictional identity before his fictional death.

That seems to me as logically valid?

Thanks
Matt
I have already answered your question.

Please review my previous post. Your logic is extremely faulty.
You don't seem to understand. I am granting you arguendo that everything in the gospels is absolute fiction. That, however, does not change for a second the fact that in that absolute fiction there are written fictional precedents for people being fictionally raised from the dead and being the same fictional people as they were before. If for those characters in the fiction, no less the case, at least logically, for the fictional Jesus.

Thanks
Matt
Scotsguy44 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:03 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.