FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Existence of God(s)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-24-2006, 04:28 AM   #2311
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 9,059
Default

Quote:
rhutchin
If you could prove that we are dealing with myths and superstitions, you could relegate the Wager to the shelf to gather dust. It is because you cannot prove your opinions that the Wager becomes useful.

JPD
That they are myths and superstitions rather demonstrates this no? Please explain how God/Satan/angels/heaven/hell etc have been demonstrated to be anything other than concepts - figments of the imagination.
Sure, right after you demonstrate that they are figments of the imagination.

Bet you can't do it.
rhutchin is offline  
Old 03-24-2006, 04:31 AM   #2312
JPD
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 5,322
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhutchin
Back to the proof issue. Proof can be had by getting people to ask God for help and see what happens. Of course, that requires that people swallow their pride which can be a problem.
And should someone ask God for help but that person does not feel that they have been helped it must be some fault of the person rather than because God has failed to deliver right? It isn't really an exercise in logic so much as seeing how desperate the arguments of believers can become.


Quote:
Originally Posted by rhutchin
The opposite of pride.
Oooh oooh, is it time for false dichotomies again? If you don't believe in God you must believe in Satan. If you are not simple and ignorant you must be full of pride - so which are you?
JPD is offline  
Old 03-24-2006, 04:32 AM   #2313
JPD
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 5,322
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhutchin
Well, it looks like I had you pegged right.
Well yeah that's right - pegged- uhuh! Hmmmm...great. Lovely for you.
JPD is offline  
Old 03-24-2006, 04:34 AM   #2314
JPD
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 5,322
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhutchin
Sure, right after you demonstrate that they are figments of the imagination.

Bet you can't do it.
By their very nature they cannot be demonstrated to be anything other than figments of the imagination. In the absence of any evidence to suggest that they are anything more than figments of the imagination I must conclude, unless some evidence presents itself (not more and more concepts, appeals to undetectable authority, emotional please etc) that they are just that.
JPD is offline  
Old 03-24-2006, 06:12 AM   #2315
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 9,059
Default

Quote:
rhutchin
The Wager presupposes that a person is uncertain whether God exists. The person can neither prove that God exists nor prove that God does not exist. If the existence of God is known with certainty or if it could be shown with certainty that God does not exist, then there is no need for the Wager.

Why is this concept so difficult for you and others to grasp?

JPD
No evidence for or against the existence of none, one, many, an infinity of Gods....
Regardless of the evidence, why do you suppose that people are unable to grasp the basic concept?
rhutchin is offline  
Old 03-24-2006, 06:14 AM   #2316
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 9,059
Default

Quote:
rhutchin
Sure, right after you demonstrate that they are figments of the imagination.

Bet you can't do it.

JPD
By their very nature they cannot be demonstrated to be anything other than figments of the imagination. In the absence of any evidence to suggest that they are anything more than figments of the imagination I must conclude, unless some evidence presents itself (not more and more concepts, appeals to undetectable authority, emotional please etc) that they are just that.
I win.
rhutchin is offline  
Old 03-24-2006, 06:34 AM   #2317
JPD
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 5,322
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhutchin
I win.
Actually no-one does - no-one can even begin to consider that one has until there is evidence for or against. That you claim to have won has as much substance as the things you claim exist by virtue of what has been written about them.
JPD is offline  
Old 03-24-2006, 06:35 AM   #2318
JPD
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 5,322
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhutchin
Regardless of the evidence, why do you suppose that people are unable to grasp the basic concept?
I don't think that people are - I think that you are unwilling to admit that the wager isn't as great as either you thought it might be or pretend that it is.
JPD is offline  
Old 03-24-2006, 06:49 AM   #2319
RGD
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The House of Reeds
Posts: 4,245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhutchin
Proof can be had by getting people to ask God for help and see what happens.
Then God is disproved or cannot be proved in this fashion. People ask for help and are not given it. Limbs regrown, anyone?
RGD is offline  
Old 03-24-2006, 06:55 AM   #2320
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhutchin
The Wager does not need to demonstrate that eternal torment exists, does it?
Cheese and rice! How many times do I have to drive it home, rhutchin? Seriously considering the Wager, actually considering it at all, depends on one believing in eternal torment. The notion of eternal torment is the first premise of the Wager. One has to believe in it to proceed into the silly Wager. Without eternal torment, the Wager is a non-starter. Go back and read all I've written about that in this thread. There's a LOT.

And, of course, the notion of eternal torment is part of the same mythos that includes the God that the Wager attempts to get one to believe, and is extracted from the same Bible that the Wager assumes you believe - it's circular as Hell. So, as to the notion of eternal torment, if one accepts that, one has already conceded that one accepts the whole nine yards.

It's incredible that you're still keeping up the same nonsense, repeating the same lame garbage that you've been repeating, and that's been torn, diced, crushed, smashed, burned, crumpled, and shredded over and over and over again!
Mageth is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:17 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.