Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
12-22-2005, 07:21 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
|
Pascal's Wager started as The Resurrection is irrelevant
Consider the following Scriptures
Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. Job 38:4 Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding. Psalm 100:3 Know ye that the Lord he is God: it is he that hath made us, and not we ourselves; we are his people, and the sheep of his pasture. Hebrews 1:10 And, Thou, Lord, in the beginning hast laid the foundation of the earth; and the heavens are the works of thine hands: Obviously, the Bible puts great emphasis on the God of the Bible being the creator of the universe, and with good reason, for if the God of the Bible did not create the universe, then his enforcement of rules of his own choosing is no more legitimate than the enforcement of rules that are mandated by any other self-proclaimed dictator of the universe. It is interesting to note that even if God is able to enforce his rules on earth, there is not any evidence at all that he can successfully enforce his rules throughout the universe. Why do Christians limit creative ability to the God of the Bible? Who knows how many advanced aliens there might be who have similar abilities? How does one tell the difference between a God and an advanced alien? If a jet plane had flown over Jerusalem in 75 A.D., surely the majority of Christians would have believed that the jet plane had supernatural origins, and they would have been wrong. I request that Christians answer the following question: Why do you believe that the God of the Bible created the universe? It is my position that the authority of the Bible depends completely upon the claim that God created the universe, and since the claim is completely non-verifiable by any tangible means, the Bible does not have any legitimate authority whatsoever. |
12-22-2005, 07:41 AM | #2 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
|
Quote:
|
|
12-22-2005, 07:48 AM | #3 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,441
|
Quote:
|
|
12-22-2005, 08:31 AM | #4 | ||||||
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
|
The Resurrection is irrelevant
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Do you mind telling us by what means you come up with your fanciful and nonsensical arguments? In other words, upon what sources do you base your arguments? Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||
12-22-2005, 03:28 PM | #5 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
|
Quote:
|
|
12-22-2005, 08:16 PM | #6 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
|
The Resurrection is irrelevant
Quote:
|
|
12-22-2005, 10:38 PM | #7 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
|
Quote:
How stupid is an argument that claims things are wrong with me because God created time and that is why I am getting older. |
|
12-23-2005, 05:55 AM | #8 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
|
The Resurrection is irrelevant
Quote:
I started this thread primarily to address what fundamentalist Christians believe, not your preposterous and outlandish arguments that almost no one endorses. I have asked you on a number of occasions what sources you use to make your assertions, but you always refuse to answer my question. Is it because you don't want to embarrass yourself? Do you get your absurd arguments out of books, or do you rely solely upon your own spiritual/emotional experiences? |
|
12-23-2005, 06:19 AM | #9 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
|
Quote:
|
|
12-23-2005, 06:34 AM | #10 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 9,059
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|