Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
11-07-2005, 06:08 AM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 2,767
|
PEANUT GALLERY: seebs vs. calebnostro -- Does the Bible condemn homosexual activity?
This thread has been set up to provide a Peanut Gallery for a FORMAL DEBATE between seebs and calebnostro on the following resolution:
Resolved: The bible clearly condemns all homosexual activity. calebnostro will affirm and seebs will oppose. The debate will tentatively have 5 rounds and calebnostro will go first. We ask that the formal debate participants refrain from posting in the Peanut Gallery until after the debate is over. Enjoy the debate! - NS, FD Moderator |
11-07-2005, 02:08 PM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
Perhaps this one will be better than the last?
|
11-09-2005, 12:47 AM | #3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brighton, England
Posts: 6,947
|
So would people think it "too close for comfort" if I comment on this debate - since my own ongoing debate is so similar in subject?
|
11-09-2005, 12:50 AM | #4 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 8,068
|
Quote:
As for calebnostro: Too Long, Didn't Read There's a reason why you get a time limit in formal debate; and why no-one ever pays attention to what's said in a filibuster. By all means make your case effectively, but get to the point if you want anyone to pay attention to you. ETA: 5000 words! John 11:35. That's not an argument, that's literary elephantiasis. |
|
11-09-2005, 09:57 AM | #5 | |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 1
|
Quote:
Being long winded isn't such a bad thing. After all, I'm sure Jesus' Sermon on the Mount took up quite a bit of time, don't you? Personally, I can't wait to see the reply. The guys evidence seemed pretty solid. |
|
11-09-2005, 02:01 PM | #6 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Out there
Posts: 486
|
I fully agree with Calebnostro. Relying on the imprecision of "lying down" to declare the phrase meaningless is lame.
The Bible is one mean homophobic, misogynic, genocidal, pornographical, senseless and inhumane piece of bronze age garbage. The most printed out book in the world... We humans are shit. |
11-09-2005, 04:04 PM | #7 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Picture postcard place
Posts: 2,376
|
I doubt seebs is going to rely on imprecision on the translation of lying down. Actually, I don't think I've ever seen anyone try to dispute the translation of that term.
|
11-09-2005, 04:53 PM | #8 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: The general vicinity of Philadelphia
Posts: 4,734
|
Well that was a long first post. I can't say I agree with the reasoning of establishing the purity laws in Leviticus and then going on to 1 Corinthians. I am surprised that calebnostro skipped Romans 1 in that correlation.
However, I think this line of reasoning is errant: Quote:
In the NAB (Catholic) translation 1 Corinthians 6:9: "Do you not know that the unjust will not inherit the Kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators nor idolators nor adulterers nor boy prostitutes nor sodomites." I know that they agreed on he KJV but nonetheless there is a context issue if calebnostro would like to go to the greek for sodomites or "abusers of themselves with mankind" and not the source for the previous condemnation. The word that is translated as boy prostitutes refers to catamites who were the cupbearers of the Gods in the Greco-Roman world and they were boy prostitutes. Therefore the following "arsenokoites" most likely refers to adult males who indulged in effeminate activities or sex with boys in that context. |
|
11-09-2005, 07:48 PM | #9 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
This should be interesting, anyway. Two Christians battling it out. |
|
11-09-2005, 08:26 PM | #10 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
|
Quote:
I think the good news here is that in verse 11 Paul adds "And such were some of you; but you have been washed, consecrated, justified in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ and in the spirit of our God." The secret here is that we cannot inherit God's kingdom with any attachments. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|