FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-12-2006, 08:23 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
Default Paul never mentions John the Baptist... Is John Jesus?

I find it interesting that Paul, as far as I can see, never mentions John the Baptist, yet the things that Paul says about Jesus correspond to things that we have record of other people saying about John the Baptist, and indeed there are John the Baptist religions that developed in parallel to Christianity and still survive.....
Malachi151 is offline  
Old 10-12-2006, 11:25 AM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Jay Raskin has put forth this hypothesis. The Evolution of Christs and Christianity (or via: amazon.co.uk).

I only know of one religion that still thinks of John the Baptist as the main prophet, the Mandean sect, and I believe that most scholars think that it is a later sect of Islam that adopted John to distinguish themselves from other sects, not a surviving sect that can be traced back to John.
Toto is offline  
Old 10-12-2006, 11:40 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Jay Raskin has put forth this hypothesis. The Evolution of Christs and Christianity (or via: amazon.co.uk).

I only know of one religion that still thinks of John the Baptist as the main prophet, the Mandean sect, and I believe that most scholars think that it is a later sect of Islam that adopted John to distinguish themselves from other sects, not a surviving sect that can be traced back to John.
I think there is reasonably good evidence that the Mandaeans are originally a gnostic group going back to around 200-300 CE.

I agree that their emphasis on John the Baptist does not go back to John himself, and may be rather late.

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 10-12-2006, 12:39 PM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle View Post
I agree that their emphasis on John the Baptist does not go back to John himself, and may be rather late.
Do you think that Mandaeans' connection with John could be analogous to the christians' connection with Jesus?


spin
spin is offline  
Old 10-12-2006, 01:30 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
Do you think that Mandaeans' connection with John could be analogous to the christians' connection with Jesus?


spin
IMVHO both later Christianity and Mandaeanism go back in different ways to Jesus and early Christianity, and share (some) common elements.

The Mandaeans distinguished themselves from their Christian rivals by claiming (non-historically) that these common elements originated with John the Baptist, came to them directly from him and were preserved by them accurately; but had been distorted by Jesus (the renegade disciple of John) and were present in Christianity only in a corrupt form.

(I can't prove this, the evidence isn't good enough, but you asked me what I thought.)

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 10-12-2006, 01:58 PM   #6
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle View Post
IMVHO both later Christianity and Mandaeanism go back in different ways to Jesus and early Christianity, and share (some) common elements.

The Mandaeans distinguished themselves from their Christian rivals by claiming (non-historically) that these common elements originated with John the Baptist, came to them directly from him and were preserved by them accurately; but had been distorted by Jesus (the renegade disciple of John) and were present in Christianity only in a corrupt form.

(I can't prove this, the evidence isn't good enough, but you asked me what I thought.)
Well, thanks. It was an interesting response.


spin
spin is offline  
Old 10-12-2006, 07:19 PM   #7
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle View Post
IMVHO both later Christianity and Mandaeanism go back in different ways to Jesus and early Christianity, and share (some) common elements.

The Mandaeans distinguished themselves from their Christian rivals by claiming (non-historically) that these common elements originated with John the Baptist, came to them directly from him and were preserved by them accurately; but had been distorted by Jesus (the renegade disciple of John) and were present in Christianity only in a corrupt form.

(I can't prove this, the evidence isn't good enough, but you asked me what I thought.)

Andrew Criddle
They are kind of right because Jesus is the way but not the end. The end is when the favorite disciple was introduced as Mary's son and that was John in the merger of the old with the new but no longer called John because the new was added to the old and therefore became known as Christ and later Jesus Christ.

That would be the reason why Jesus left and Christ stayed so that Jesus can come again to show us the way in a one-by-each kind of way (Jn.21:22). Hint, there is no second coming of Christ in Christendom.
Chili is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:48 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.