FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-30-2011, 07:03 PM   #301
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: southwest
Posts: 1,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by schriverja View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by simon kole View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by schriverja View Post
Simon, it occurs to me that you have presented a couple of hypotheses in this thread. One, that that the Bible has basic Logical Consistency (posted here). The second one, that the Bible is unified (posted here).

The interesting thing is that it seems that you haven't looked for passages that would falsify these two assertions. It seems you've only looked for passages that would confirm them.

When I (and many others) have presented passages that would directly challenge these two hypotheses, you have done a lot of energetic down-playing of those examples. But have you actually considered the objections? Have you acknowledged and challenged your own assumptions*?
That's what examining the proposed contradictions is.

Are you saying I have not shown in terms of the whole Bible that they are false contradictions?
I understand you are completely ok with contradictions, you just go with whatever was written later, especially if Protestant-favorite Paul wrote it. I think this is because of your presupposition that the whole text should be taken as a whole text. But you haven't even attempted to show that this is a valid approach.
That is outside my purview, which is examining the actual textual content of the whole Bible for any actual textual contradictions therein.
Quote:
Showing that more recent texts cite older texts doesn't show that it is unified. Sam Harris cites the Bible extensively in his book Letter to a Christian Nation, that doesn't mean that his book is unified with the Bible. Scientists cite earlier scientists all the time, it doesn't demonstrate that there is 100% agreement on the contents of their scientific arguments. People build upon the work of earlier people, especially when the earlier person was highly respected. It is my view that this is what is going on when the NT quotes the Hebrew Scriptures.

Quote:

Quote:
*anticipating pointing the same accusation back at me, I acknowledge that at one time I did believe that the Bible was basically unified and logically coherent. I was a very dedicated, baptized evangelical who spent hours each week in personal and group Bible study. Once I realized that I didn't apply the same sort of rigorous scrutiny towards my faith (at that time) as I did in my job (as a development engineer) or towards other belief systems, I realized that I had been succumbing to confirmation bias in a big way without even realizing it.
I hear you.

But my faith is not based on standards by which other faiths would be overcome under rigorous scrutiny.
Nor is it based on there being no immaterial errors in the Biblical texts (in terms of its doctrines).
My faith is based on the internal witness of the Holy Spirit, which gives Scripture to evidence itself to me
as God-breathed.

While the basis of my participation in this form is given here.
I am asking if you have checked your assumptions that the 'internal witness of the Holy Spirit' is a real thing, and not just a quirk of human psychology. Lot's of religions have an equivalent to the Holy Spirit. You think the adherents to those faiths are wrong, do you not? You think they aren't actually being witnessed to by the Holy Spirit. Presumably, you think that they are actually just hearing their own voices in their head, a combination of cultural indoctrination and wishful thinking. How have you demonstrated to yourself that the same can't be said for your own inner witness?
And this concerns you, why?

It is not relevant to examining the content of Biblical texts for actual textual contradictions, which is my purview.
simon kole is offline  
Old 06-30-2011, 07:42 PM   #302
Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Babble Belt
Posts: 20,748
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by simon kole View Post
The NT letter to the Hebrews reveals, among other things,
the new covenant of Jer 31:31 (Heb 8:7-8),
the obsolence of the old covenant (Heb 8:13),
HOLD everything!

God's covenant with the Jews was an "everlasting" covenant, according to YHWH.

A covenant which can become obsolete is NOT "everlasting."

So if the NT claims that the "everlasting" covenant is obsolete, along with the Law which was to be FOREVER, then the NT is contradicting the OT.

If the covenant was not everlasting, why does the OT say it was?

If the covenant was everlasting, why does the NT claim it is not?

Mega Fail.
Davka is offline  
Old 06-30-2011, 08:36 PM   #303
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: southwest
Posts: 1,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post

Now simon, that is not nice at all. YOU LEFT OUT;

31. Behold, the days come, saith Yahweh, that I will make a new covenant with The House of Israel, and with The House of Judah:

32. Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; whYahweh:

33. But this shall be the covenant that I will make with The House of Israel; After those days, saith Yahweh, I WILL PUT MY LAW in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their Elohim, and they shall be my people.

34. And they shall teach no more every man his neighbor, and every man his brother, saying, Know Yahweh: for they shall all know Me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith Yahweh: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more." (Jer 31:31)

A few points about this prophecy. First, it specifically includes both "The House of Israel and The House of JUDAH."

Do you think Paul is in error in Romans 11:25-27 when he tells you;

25. For I would not, brethren, that you should be ignorant of this mystery, lest you should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fullness of the Gentiles be come in.
You know as well as I do that the former refers to the divided kingdom, and Paul is referring to all the Jews.

Quote:
28. As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers' sakes.

30. For as you in times past have not believed Elohim, yet have now obtained mercy through their unbelief:

31. Even so have these also now not believed, that through your mercy they also may obtain mercy.

32. For Elohim hath concluded them all in unbelief, that He might have mercy upon all.

If you, a Gentile, are now through faith accounted of the House of Israel, it is only by the adoption, and your ingrafting into that ONE tree of faith.
Thus Paul says to you; 18. "Do not boast against the branches. But if you do boast, remember that you do not support the root, but the root supports you."

That 'root' being the natural olive tree, the descendent's of Israel according to the flesh; that is to say, the Jews, whether by birth, or by means of conversion to the religion of Judaism
That root being the believing patriarchs.
Quote:
23. And they also, if they abide not still in unbelief, shall be grafted in: for Elohim is able to graff them in again.
24. For if thou wert cut out of the olive tree which is wild by nature, and wert grafted contrary to nature into a good olive tree: how much more shall these, which be the natural branches, be grafted into their own olive tree?"

In due time.

Both the prophesy. and Paul recognize that a 'blindness' would continue to hold blind those of that natural, 'good' (domesticated v.24) olive tree of The House of Israel and The House of Judah 'until the fullness of the Gentiles be come in'. (and 'The DOOR' is not yet shut; they are still coming in) This 'blindness' and rejection of The Gospel by Judaism was ordained by and caused by Yahweh Elohi Israel, and is for a purpose.

The prophesy of Jeremiah 31 (and Paul) goes on to the expectation of a better day and a future final fulfillment when Yahweh will put His LAW in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts;
That is precisely the work of the Holy Spirit in the NT.
Quote:
And a time to come when men will no longer need to "teach every man his neighbor, and every man his brother, saying, Know YAHWEH: for they shall ALL know Him, from the least of them unto the greatest"
Something that has obviously not yet been fully accomplished, or you yourself wouldn't be here trying to teach us of The Scriptures.
That will be accomplished in the eternal Messianic kingdom of the new heavens and the new earth.

Quote:
Originally Posted by simon kole View Post
Quote:
The NT letter to the Hebrews reveals, among other things,
the new covenant of Jer 31:31 (Heb 8:7-8),
the obsolence of the old covenant (Heb 8:13),
the abolishment of the Levitical priesthood (Heb 7:11-12, 17-19), and
the abolishment of the Levitical laws whose basis it was (Heb 7:11-12).

The NT letter to the Hebrews is no more a "contradiction" of the OT than
the old sign, which points to a temporary bridge while a new and better bridge is being built, and which sign is removed, is a "contradiction" to
the new sign, which points to the completed new and better bridge, which sign replaces the old one.
Quote:
I'm afraid you do not actually understand the real Paul's position regarding The Law of Yahweh.
Methinks it is thou who dost not understand Paul's real position regarding the Law.

Paul said all those who rely on observing the law are under a curse, for not keeping it perfectly (Gal 3:10).
Quote:
His preaching to the Gentiles was that they, The Gentiles, did not need undergo circumcision or follow legalistic Jewish practices to be accepted as fellow heirs to the promises, and admission into the Kingdom of Heaven. (as certain Jews zealous for The Law, but without understanding, were attempting to impose upon believing Gentiles as a required precondition of divine acceptance or of receiving His salvation.)
This was really nothing new, as to Gentile 'believers' (the Ger Toshavim- "the stranger(s) within (thy) gates") who were from the first institution of The Laws, excepted by law, from any requirement of obedience to most of these strictly Jewish obligations.)

Natural Israel, however is not granted any such liberties, because of the hardness of their hearts,
That hardness of their hearts is hatred and rejection of Jesus of Nazareth as their Messiah.
Quote:
The Law remains active and in full force
The Law remains active and in full force for no one as a way of obtaining the promises and the Kingdom.

It is replaced by faith in Jesus of Nazareth as the Messiah as the only way to obtain the promises and the Kingdom.
Quote:
that their transgressions of the commandments and sins might multiply and abound. UNTIL that time of Israel's national repentance, wherein the nation of Israel will at the last publicly cry out;
Israel will at last publicly cry out regarding Jesus of Nazareth. . .
Quote:
ברוך הבא בשם יהוה ברכנוכם מבית יהוה׃
"Baruch ha'Ba B'Shem YAHWEH! Barach'nu'chem meh'Beth YAHWEH!"
"Blessed is He that cometh in the Name of YAHWEH! We have blessed You from The House of YAHWEH!"
(Psa 118:26, Luke 13:35)
As of this day the natural branches of The House of Israel, and of The House of Judah still refuse to shout joyfully to the world that which is written.

Then, and only then, with a faithful recitation of these words by The House of Israel and The House of Judah, will they at the long last reap of this promise; "I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more." (Jer 31:31)
Then, and only then, when Israel (the Hebrews) shouts joyfully to the world the acceptance of Jesus of Nazareth as her Messiah, will they at long last reap the promise of forgiveness and of the Kingdom.

Quote:
And of course this also implies their long delayed acceptance and embracing of Him who spoke these words saying;
"I will declare Thy NAME unto my brethren: in the midst of the congregation will I praise You." (Psalm 22:22, John 17:26 & Hebrews 2:10-13)

There is of course -another- power at work among the Gentiles, and all children of disobedience,
which also includes disobedience to Father God's command, given through Jesus
(who spoke only what Father God told him to say**),
to "Repent and believe in the Lord Jesus Christ (Mk 1:15; Ac 16:30-31).
Quote:
even that one that directs the thoughts and the course of a huge, wealthy and powerful Babylonian 'worldy religion', That old 'Mother of Whores' and all of her her whoring daughters, oh so sucessfully decieving men against the truth
while operating in another name.
_____________________

** Jn 12:50, 7:16, 8:25-28, 12:44-45, 49-50; 14:10; Lk 9:35, 10:16
simon kole is offline  
Old 06-30-2011, 08:48 PM   #304
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: southwest
Posts: 1,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Perspicuo View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by simon kole View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
Quote:
He that is born in thy house, and he that is bought with thy money, must needs be circumcised: and my covenant shall be in your flesh for an EVERLASTING Covenant. (Gen 17:13)
Quote:
Exd 12:14 And this day shall be unto you for a memorial; and you shall keep it a feast to YHWH throughout your generations; you shall keep it a feast by an ordinance FOREVER.
Quote:
And you shall observe The Feast of Unleavened Bread; for in this selfsame day have I brought your armies out of the land of Egypt: therefore you shall observe this day in your generations by an ordinance FOREVER. (Ex 12:17)
Quote:
Speak thou also unto the children of Israel, saying, Verily My Sabbaths you shall keep: for it is a sign between Me and you throughout your generations; that you may know that I am Yahweh that doth sanctify you (Ex 13:31)
Quote:
Wherefore the children of Israel shall keep The Sabbath, to observe The Sabbath throughout their generations, for a PERPETUAL COVENANT.
(Ex 31:16)
Quote:
It is a sign between Me and the children of Israel FOREVER: for in six days Yahweh made heaven and earth, and on The Seventh Day, He rested, and was refreshed. (Ex 31:17)
Quote:
And this shall be a statute FOREVER unto you: In the seventh month, on the tenth day of the month, you shall afflict your souls, and do no work at all, whether it be one of your own country, or a stranger that sojourneth among you: (Lev 16:29)
Quote:
It shall be a Sabbath of Rest unto you, and you shall afflict your souls, by a statute FOREVER. (Lev 16:31)
Quote:
And you shall eat neither bread, nor parched corn, nor green ears, until the selfsame day that you have brought an offering unto your Elohim: it shall be a statute FOREVER throughout your generations in all your dwellings. (Lev 23:14)
Quote:
And you shall proclaim on the selfsame day, [b]that it may be an holy convocation unto you: you shall do no servile work therein: it shall be a statute FOREVER in all your dwellings throughout your generations. (Lev 23:21)
Quote:
You shall do no manner of work: it shall be a statute FOREVER throughout your generations in all your dwellings. (Lev 23:31)
Quote:
And ye shall keep it a Feast unto Yahweh seven days in the year. It shall be a statute FOREVER in your generations: ye shall celebrate it in the seventh month. (Lev 23:41)
Quote:
The Law of Yahweh is perfect, converting the soul: (Psa 19:7)
Quote:
The statutes of Yahweh are right, rejoicing the heart; The Commandment of Yahweh is pure, enlightening the eyes; (Psa 19:8)
Quote:
For the Commandment is a lamp; and The Law is light; and reproofs of instruction are the way of life: (Pro 6:23)
Quote:
Keep The Commandments and keep your life; despising them leads to death. (Pro 19:16)
Quote:
Remember The Law of Moses, My servant, Which I commanded him in Horeb for all Israel, With the statutes and judgments. (Mal 4:4)
Quote:
Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life?

.. If thou wilt enter into life, Keep The Commandments. (Matt 19:16-17)
The question was what does it take to obtain "eternal life"? The answer (suprise) was "Keep The Commandments."
Quote:
And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which Keep The Commandments of Elohim, (Rev 12:17)
Quote:
Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that Keep The Commandments of Elohim,....(Rev 14:12)
These are only a small portion of the verses that express the lasting permanance of The Law. "throughout your generations".
The generations of Israel are still going on, and "forever" has not ever ended.

Now simon tell me your interpretation of the NT that does not contradict these verses.
You've left out later OT Scriptures that bear on the everlasting covenant, such as Jer 31:31:

"The time is coming," declares the LORD, "when I will made a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah."

The NT letter to the Hebrews reveals, among other things,
the new covenant of Jer 31:31 (Heb 8:7-8),
the obsolence of the old covenant (Heb 8:13),
the abolishment of the Levitical priesthood (Heb 7:11-12, 17-19), and
the abolishment of the Levitical laws whose basis it was (Heb 7:11-12).

The NT letter to the Hebrews is no more a "contradiction" of the OT than
the old sign, which points to a temporary bridge while a new and better bridge is being built, and which sign is removed, is a "contradiction" to
the new sign, which points to the completed new and better bridge, which sign replaces the old one.
You didn't...



... shuffle the cups fast enough so that we wouldn't notice that according to that God's Law is not eternal, that He changes His mind. And that therefore, it's bunk, Christianity is a fraud.
It's up to you whether or not to accept what the letter to the Hebrews reports.
simon kole is offline  
Old 06-30-2011, 08:52 PM   #305
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: southwest
Posts: 1,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Davka View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by simon kole View Post
The NT letter to the Hebrews reveals, among other things,
the new covenant of Jer 31:31 (Heb 8:7-8),
the obsolence of the old covenant (Heb 8:13),
HOLD everything!

God's covenant with the Jews was an "everlasting" covenant, according to YHWH.

A covenant which can become obsolete is NOT "everlasting."

So if the NT claims that the "everlasting" covenant is obsolete, along with the Law which was to be FOREVER, then the NT is contradicting the OT.

If the covenant was not everlasting, why does the OT say it was?

If the covenant was everlasting, why does the NT claim it is not?

Mega Fail.
Firin' from the hip?

And why does God say he will make a new covenant (Jer 31:31)?
simon kole is offline  
Old 06-30-2011, 09:00 PM   #306
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

Quote:
8. He hath remembered His Covenant forever, The Word which He commanded to a thousand generations.

9. Which [covenant] he made with Abraham, and his oath unto Isaac;

10. And confirmed the same unto Jacob for a Law, and to Israel for an EVERLASTING COVENANT:
~
43. And he brought forth his people with joy, and his chosen with gladness:

44. And gave them the lands of the heathen: and they inherited the labour of the people;

45. THAT THEY MIGHT OBSERVE HIS STATUTES, AND KEEP HIS LAWS;
Praise ye YAH! (hallelu-YAH!)
A 'thousand generations' of Israel. How many years are in a generation of Israel?

40 years? 40x1000= 40,000 years.

20 years? 20x1000= 20,000 years.

A 'thousand generations' is a long, long, long time, certainly much longer than a paltry 3000 years or so.

simon, The New Covenant is real, but it only becomes effective if one dies.

This is the reason for our 'baptism', being laid down into that watery grave, the old man dies, and is put to rest, and a new man comes to life and arises from that 'grave'.
This new man is no longer under the curses of the Law, because his baptism is accounted as the death of the flesh, that he might henceforth live forevermore in the spirit.
Once accomplished, that soul thenceforth being accounted as now among those who have died, cannot sin. For Yahweh will no longer impute any sin to those washed and justified by the water, and by the blood. (Psa 32:1-2, Rom 4:7-8)
All things therefore become lawful unto them who are so blessed, but not all things become expedient.

Yet for them that -live in the flesh- The LAW of Yahweh FOREVER remains unto their condemnation.
For without The Law sin is not made manifest, and "sin is the transgressions of The Law;" Wherefore The Law remains that transgressions and sin might abound in the children of disobedience.

But unto Israel Yahweh has spoken; "Be glad then, ye children of Zion, and rejoice in Yahweh your Elohim: for He hath given you the former rain moderately, and he will cause to come down for you the rain, the former rain, and the latter rain in the first month."

"Ask ye of Yahweh rain in the time of the latter rain; Yahweh shall make bright clouds, and give them showers of rain, to every one grass in the field."

"Then shall we know, if we follow on to know Yahweh: His going forth is prepared as the morning; and he shall come unto us as the rain, as the latter and former rain unto the earth."

"I will give you the rain of your land in his due season, the first rain and the latter rain,"

"Be patient therefore, brethren, unto the coming of the Master.
Behold, the husbandman waiteth for the precious fruit of the earth, and hath long patience for it, until he receive the early and latter rain."

A small harvest, even a 'wave sheaf', then a long growing season unto the time of the latter rain, after that comes the final great harvest.

Then there shall be great rejoicing in The Feast of Ingathering over the abundance of The Great Harvest. "And so shall all Israel be saved."
hallelu-YAH!


edited to add.
But I see by your above response that your heart is hard set against the receiving of any such good words.

You say; "You know as well as I do that the former refers to the divided kingdom, and Paul is referring to all the Jews."
With what words does Paul refer to all Jews in Hebrews 8:8 ?

You say; "the believing patriarchs." But that clearly is not of whom Paul is speaking in Romans 11:11-32.
Let any one read those words and see your error.

If you must be this dishonest in your reading of the texts, there is nothing more I can offer, other than a prayer for you, for this shame which you bring upon yourself..




.
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 06-30-2011, 09:17 PM   #307
Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Babble Belt
Posts: 20,748
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by simon kole View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davka View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by simon kole View Post
The NT letter to the Hebrews reveals, among other things,
the new covenant of Jer 31:31 (Heb 8:7-8),
the obsolence of the old covenant (Heb 8:13),
HOLD everything!

God's covenant with the Jews was an "everlasting" covenant, according to YHWH.

A covenant which can become obsolete is NOT "everlasting."

So if the NT claims that the "everlasting" covenant is obsolete, along with the Law which was to be FOREVER, then the NT is contradicting the OT.

If the covenant was not everlasting, why does the OT say it was?

If the covenant was everlasting, why does the NT claim it is not?

Mega Fail.
Firin' from the hip?

And why does God say he will make a new covenant (Jer 31:31)?
BibleGod made lots of covenants. Each one was new. But the making of a new covenant in no way nullified those covenants which went before.

Once again, mega fail. You CANNOT show that YHWH of the OT ever intended his everlasting covenants to be anything other than everlasting.
Davka is offline  
Old 06-30-2011, 09:29 PM   #308
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 6,010
Default but

Quote:
Originally Posted by Davka View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by simon kole View Post
Firin' from the hip?

And why does God say he will make a new covenant (Jer 31:31)?
BibleGod made lots of covenants. Each one was new. But the making of a new covenant in no way nullified those covenants which went before.

Once again, mega fail. You CANNOT show that YHWH of the OT ever intended his everlasting covenants to be anything other than everlasting.
But what if a Jew becomes an atheist or a Christian, Buddhist or Hindu? Would the covenant be broken? Can't Jews get out of it by breaking all the rules? What if a Jew just ignores the whole thing?
Steve Weiss is offline  
Old 06-30-2011, 09:55 PM   #309
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

Poor simon cannot get it through his head that minus The Laws of YHWH, sin is not made manifest, and "sin is the transgressions of The Law;" (1 John 3:4)
Wherefore The Law must needs remain that transgressions and sin might abound -and be made manifest- in the children of disobedience.
Without The Law of YHWH to define what is sin, one may not know what it is that constitutes sin in the eyes of YHWH.
As Paul said; "I had not known sin, except by The Law." (Rom 7:7)
And sin has not ceased because The Law has not ceased. For this cause Israel is yet under guilt unto this day, in that they cannot do (even if willing) ALL that which The Law requires of them. Yet Israel (the Jews) for the sake of His promises, are predicted to be, by His Mercy, wholly redeemed from that guilt in due time. (Jer 31:33-34)
This will not be their doing, but will be His doing, when in due season He sends 'the latter rain' abundantly upon the grass of His people Israel. He will pour out His spirit upon them, when He is ready to do so, until then, they cannot be other than as they are, as He has made them to be, for the sake of the saving of the Gentiles.





.
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 07-01-2011, 05:33 AM   #310
Moderator - History of Non Abrahamic Religions, General Religious Discussions
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Latin America
Posts: 6,620
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by simon kole View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Perspicuo View Post

You didn't...



... shuffle the cups fast enough so that we wouldn't notice that according to that God's Law is not eternal, that He changes His mind. And that therefore, it's bunk, Christianity is a fraud.
It's up to you whether or not to accept what the letter to the Hebrews reports.
That His Law is everlasting? It's the NT writers who don't think so. It's not up to me, it's the logical inconsistency of the Bible. Coincidentally, the subject of this thread.

Interesting read on the subject:
WHY DON'T JEWS BELIEVE IN JESUS? (Jewish site)
  • Jesus did not fulfill the messianic prophecies in scripture.
  • Jesus did not embody the scriptural qualifications of the Messiah.
  • Biblical verses referring to Jesus are mistranslations.
  • Christianity contradicts Jewish scripture.
Perspicuo is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:41 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.