Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
04-29-2004, 12:10 PM | #111 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Greensboro, NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,597
|
Quote:
Oh, you meant arK......well, that's just a load of bollocks... Nevermind.... |
|
04-29-2004, 01:12 PM | #112 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: I Owe the World an Apology
Posts: 890
|
Quote:
Anyone know anything about neolithic metallurgy? I am quite skeptical that titanium would have been used as the primary alloy ingredient in those rivets at that time. I thought that copper and iron (steel) were the primary metals of choice. Please enlighten me. -jim |
|
04-29-2004, 01:39 PM | #113 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Washington, NC
Posts: 1,696
|
Wait a minute! Wait a minute!
What the hell is all this "bow" business? Ark advocates today have reconstructed a boxlike vessel based on Biblical descriptions, something like this: That's the only way to justfiy the incredible tonnage and other rationalizations (number of juvenile "kinds", food storage, etc.) in all their presentations. I attended a lecture last year entitled "The True Story of Noah's Ark" that analyzed an identical craft, very similar to the analysis at this site, which reaffirms that: Quote:
Quote:
Hasn't anyone pointed this out, yet? |
||
04-29-2004, 01:46 PM | #114 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: West London
Posts: 2,337
|
Quote:
http://www.sron.nl/~jheise/akkadian/prehistory.html It is Mesopotamian, therefore it should be relevant. But Titanium!!? Steel!!? See Bessemer et al. I really don't know what these people are on. LSD by any chance? |
|
04-29-2004, 01:56 PM | #115 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: West London
Posts: 2,337
|
Quote:
|
|
04-29-2004, 02:10 PM | #116 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Washington, NC
Posts: 1,696
|
I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks it looks like a harmonica.
See the steps attached to the end? I think that's for when Noah's finished skiing. |
04-29-2004, 02:34 PM | #117 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: I Owe the World an Apology
Posts: 890
|
Quote:
-jim "Don't Mess with the Potamian." said the man from Ur. |
|
04-29-2004, 02:35 PM | #118 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: West London
Posts: 2,337
|
Brick Wakeman!!?
Quote:
As stated in my first post on this thread. If this turns out to be a hoax, which I confidently state it is; it would not disprove the 'validity' of an Ark, but it would prove what inexactitudinarians these people are. And- Quote:
|
||
04-29-2004, 02:46 PM | #119 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Washington, NC
Posts: 1,696
|
Quote:
|
|
04-29-2004, 02:53 PM | #120 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Baltimore/DC area
Posts: 1,306
|
Quote:
As far as the biblical diluge, I have to wonder about what was being referred to as the world. Since the bible is the story of the relationship between God and His chosen people would it not be possible that the usage of "the world" pertaiined to the Hebrew world as they knew it? Wouldn't it be possible that there was a period of great rains that flooded a large area of the Middle East at one time similar to the annual flooding that has created waddies? |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|