FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-20-2006, 11:55 AM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic
I do not understand all of these debates about genealogies. Even if we had an accurate genealogy from Adam though Mary, or Adam through Joseph, all that that would mean is that we have an accurate genealogy of Mary or Joseph, not of Jesus.
Yes you do, the Joseph line had to be crucified to set Mary's line free. Mary was bethrothed 'as' the dowry of the firstborn here born to collect his worth. Notice that she becomes the bride of the lamb 'in' the New Jerusalem 'as' the woman who was behind it all.
Chili is offline  
Old 01-20-2006, 12:25 PM   #2
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default Two different genealogies of Jesus

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic
I do not understand all of these debates about genealogies. Even if we had an accurate genealogy from Adam though Mary, or Adam through Joseph, all that that would mean is that we have an accurate genealogy of Mary or Joseph, not of Jesus.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
Yes you do
No I don't. If Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit, he couldn't possibly have had a genealogy. In addition, we don't know what Mary's and Joseph's genealogies were, in fact, not even back several hundred years. Records might have been changed, or lost and made up.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
the Joseph line had to be crucified
Crucified? Where do you get crucified from? As far as I know, crucifixion is never mentioned in the Old Testament, and even it is mentioned, it is never mentioned in connection with the Son of God.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
to set Mary's line free. Mary was bethrothed 'as' the dowry of the firstborn here born to collect his worth. Notice that she becomes the bride of the lamb 'in' the New Jerusalem 'as' the woman who was behind it all.
Please quote the scriptures that you are referring to, and please tell us why you are stating arguments that you do not hold to be true. The first commandment in the Ten Commandants says "thou shalt have no other Gods before me." The commandment mentions a specific God, and God is identified elsewhere by a specific name. Do you worship that specific God? Do you regularly attend a Christian Church. If so, which denomination? Do you believe that Jesus bodily rose from the dead and was seen by over 500 people? Do you frequently encourage people to become Christians and reject other religions? Do you have any idea what happens to people after they die?
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 01-20-2006, 04:02 PM   #3
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic
No I don't. If Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit, he couldn't possibly have had a genealogy. In addition, we don't know what Mary's and Joseph's genealogies were, in fact, not even back several hundred years. Records might have been changed, or lost and made up.
Jesus was not conceived if Christ was born unto Joseph and Mary was from the tree of Life in the mind of Joseph who was send into the conscious mind to give birth to the child within. We call it rebirth of the first-begotten son of man etc. They shall call him Jesus makes reference to the dual nature of Joseph. Period.
Quote:

Crucified? Where do you get crucified from? As far as I know, crucifixion is never mentioned in the Old Testament, and even it is mentioned, it is never mentioned in connection with the Son of God.
It was a long standing practice in Jewish tradition and that is very obvious. The son of God never gets crucified but the Jew does. Bar-abbas was set free and Jesus the Jew was convicted under Jewish law and Jewish law only.
Quote:

Please quote the scriptures that you are referring to, and please tell us why you are stating arguments that you do not hold to be true. The first commandment in the Ten Commandants says "thou shalt have no other Gods before me." The commandment mentions a specific God, and God is identified elsewhere by a specific name. Do you worship that specific God? Do you regularly attend a Christian Church. If so, which denomination? Do you believe that Jesus bodily rose from the dead and was seen by over 500 people? Do you frequently encourage people to become Christians and reject other religions? Do you have any idea what happens to people after they die?
I have no Gods before me, behind me, or beside me. I just read without any prior conviction and let the words speak to me.
Chili is offline  
Old 01-20-2006, 08:33 PM   #4
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default Chili on geneologies split from 2 different geneologies of Jesus

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
Please quote the scriptures that you are referring to, and please tell us why you are stating arguments that you do not hold to be true. The first commandment in the Ten Commandants says "thou shalt have no other Gods before me." The commandment mentions a specific God, and God is identified elsewhere by a specific name. Do you worship that specific God? Do you regularly attend a Christian Church. If so, which denomination? Do you believe that Jesus bodily rose from the dead and was seen by over 500 people? Do you frequently encourage people to become Christians and reject other religions? Do you have any idea what happens to people after they die?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
I have no Gods before me, behind me, or beside me. I just read without any prior conviction and let the words speak to me.
In other words, you make posts only to address what people believe, not to address whether or not God's only begotten Son actually bodily rose from the dead, right? Regarding "I just read without any prior conviction and let the words speak to me," what are you hoping that the words will reveal to you about the mysteries of the universe? How much interest do you have in religious books other than the Bible? I find it interesting that you said without any "prior" conviction. What is your "subsequent" conviction?
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 01-20-2006, 08:51 PM   #5
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default Chili on geneologies split from 2 different geneologies of Jesus

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic
No I don't. If Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit, he couldn't possibly have had a genealogy. In addition, we don't know what Mary's and Joseph's genealogies were, in fact, not even back several hundred years. Records might have been changed, or lost and made up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
Jesus was not conceived if Christ was borne unto Joseph
That's news to anyone? I don't think so.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
and Mary was from the tree of Life in the mind of Joseph
Don't you mean in the mind of the Bible writer who wrote about it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
who was sent into the conscious mind
The writer's conscious mind, right?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
to give birth to the child within.
To give birth to what child within? Were you there? Did you examine Mary's womb and find out how Jesus was conceived?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
We call it rebirth of the first-begotten son of man etc.
You mean rebirth in human mythology, not what actually happened, right?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
They shall call him Jesus makes reference to the dual nature of Joseph. Period.
More human mythology, right?
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 01-21-2006, 06:45 AM   #6
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic
That's news to anyone? I don't think so.
There is a reason for calling him Jesus if Christ was born and this is especially true since the circumstances were different. Do you think maybe that they should have called him Christ to make it easier to understand?
Quote:

Don't you mean in the mind of the Bible writer who wrote about it?
Yes, these are first hand accounts of an archetypal event that was prior to the author by nature.
Quote:

The writer's conscious mind, right?
Right.
Quote:

To give birth to what child within? Were you there? Did you examine Mary's womb and find out how Jesus was conceived?
That is what rebirth is all about. The first-born is reborn to re-unite with the woman that was taken from man when man became an earthly hu-man being. The woman did not become earthly, wherefore it is said that Mary was without sin, and therefore was the Immaculate conception of things as they are = insight without perversion and therefore no guile in Nathanael. She was his dowry and therefore Joseph's in betrothal = eternally his to be his eternal presence.
Quote:

You mean rebirth in human mythology, not what actually happened, right?
Human mythology is an awkward expression because humans are not smart enough to write a mythology or they would know what actually happened.
Quote:

More human mythology, right?
Let's call it inspired to you.
Chili is offline  
Old 01-21-2006, 11:20 AM   #7
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default Chili on geneologies split from 2 different geneologies of Jesus

[quote=JohnnySkeptic] You mean rebirth in human mythology, not what actually happened, right?]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
Human mythology is an awkward expression because humans are not smart enough to write a mythology or they would know what actually happened.
What actually happened?
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 01-21-2006, 08:56 PM   #8
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

[QUOTE=Johnny Skeptic]
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnySkeptic
You mean rebirth in human mythology, not what actually happened, right?]

What actually happened?
Mythologies are written by mythmakers and they have noetic vision. Below them are mystics with lyric vision, believers with telec vision and doubters with hyletic vision.

What happened, to make a long story short, was that Joseph had a change of vision.
Chili is offline  
Old 01-21-2006, 09:07 PM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: .............
Posts: 2,914
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili from a previous post
humans are not smart enough to write a mythology
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
Mythologies are written by mythmakers
If not human, what are the mythmakers then?


Valz
Evoken is offline  
Old 01-22-2006, 06:46 AM   #10
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Valz
If not human, what are the mythmakers then?

Valz
Divine without the human condition. The hu- is the addition to show the human condition that must be crucified to be divine.

The writers are not inspired because to be inspired one must be human to be other than what you normally are. That is why they were divine and normal in their noetic mind, which is the mind of Christ as Lord God and God. To us as humans their writings are inspired for as long as we are human. This same is true with the trinity that does not really exists except in our human condition which is why we cannot grasp it either.
Chili is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:27 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.