FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-21-2006, 08:09 AM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: midwest
Posts: 3,827
Default Jesus: a split personality

Many passages in the bible describe jesus to be a liberal and many passages seem to describe jesus as a fascist dictator.

Could it be there may be wriiten in the gospels two men named jesus or jesus had a split personality.
proudliberal is offline  
Old 01-21-2006, 10:51 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,110
Default

I may be wrong, but from my understanding of the Bible, Jesus was not promoting liberal policies. Asking people to feed the hungry, clothe the naked, etc. is not a liberal attitude. A liberal attitude is forcing people to do those things, by taxation, rather than voluntarily.

Again, there may be other doctrines propounded by Jesus that could be considered liberal or even collectivist, but I don't recall what they would be.
Mr. B is offline  
Old 01-21-2006, 01:34 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 51
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by proudliberal
Many passages in the bible describe jesus to be a liberal and many passages seem to describe jesus as a fascist dictator.

Could it be there may be wriiten in the gospels two men named jesus or jesus had a split personality.
I don't think so. Modern sects have different brands of Jesus. So, I think it's reasonable to conclude the differences in his biblical personality stem from that. Mark "started" it, Matthew and Luke gave their spin and John went in a different direction from all of them.

Karen
karen is offline  
Old 01-21-2006, 01:51 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Posts: 10,887
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. B
I may be wrong, but from my understanding of the Bible, Jesus was not promoting liberal policies. Asking people to feed the hungry, clothe the naked, etc. is not a liberal attitude. A liberal attitude is forcing people to do those things, by taxation, rather than voluntarily.

Again, there may be other doctrines propounded by Jesus that could be considered liberal or even collectivist, but I don't recall what they would be.
He does force people to do what he says. Hell card... :devil:
general_koffi is offline  
Old 01-22-2006, 12:08 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,110
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by general_koffi
He does force people to do what he says. Hell card... :devil:
That's an interesting take. However, I understand the Christian doctrine to be that one has the free will to choose whether to do right or not. I doubt whether Jesus (assuming that there was such a guy) would consider a person to be following the Christian model if he were, for example, giving to the poor only insofar as he does it through the forced mechanism of taxes.
Mr. B is offline  
Old 01-22-2006, 03:47 PM   #6
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: midwest
Posts: 3,827
Default

Quote:
I may be wrong, but from my understanding of the Bible, Jesus was not promoting liberal policies. Asking people to feed the hungry, clothe the naked, etc. is not a liberal attitude. A liberal attitude is forcing people to do those things, by taxation, rather than voluntarily.
Well if they were volunteering they would not have to tax,would they?

Jesus was spreading liberal policies because the conservative philosophy is "so what let them starve.If they cant afford to eat thats not my problem."
proudliberal is offline  
Old 01-22-2006, 11:18 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,110
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by proudliberal
Well if they were volunteering they would not have to tax,would they?

Jesus was spreading liberal policies because the conservative philosophy is "so what let them starve.If they cant afford to eat thats not my problem."
I'm no conservative, but I know that that last paragraph is horseshit.

So, when conservatives give to charities helping the poor, they do it for what reason?
Mr. B is offline  
Old 01-23-2006, 04:07 PM   #8
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: midwest
Posts: 3,827
Default

Quote:
So, when conservatives give to charities helping the poor, they do it for what reason?
Tax deductions and write offs.They care less about the poor.If they even give in the first place.

Why did the coal mining company get over 200 safety violations?Tax writeoffs and the cost of doing business.They cared less about the miners until they are dead and the families are suing.
proudliberal is offline  
Old 01-23-2006, 05:22 PM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Washington, DC (formerly Denmark)
Posts: 3,789
Default

[MOD]
This is the BC&H forum, please comment on topics that relate to those issues. Most of this thread looks more like PD.

Julian
Moderator BC&H
[/MOD]
Julian is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:00 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.