Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
04-27-2012, 07:56 AM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
|
Very little dispute
Page 88 of Did Jesus Exist is amazing.
'There is very little dispute that some of the Gospel stories originated in Aramaic, and they therefore go back to the earliest stages of the Christian movement in Palestine.' 'Very little dispute'? Carrier claims the book misinforms readers. How many people will now be told that even Bart Ehrman says 'there is very litle dispute....' that some Gospel stories go back to the earliest stages of the Christian movement in Palestine ( because they originated in Aramaic, you see). Just how many years has Ehrman set back the state of knowledge about the Bible with just one little book aimed 'at a general audience'? |
04-27-2012, 08:18 AM | #2 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,397
|
It must be the new consensus, even Thom Stark says so:
Quote:
|
|
04-28-2012, 12:49 AM | #3 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
|
Quote:
Andrew Criddle |
|
04-28-2012, 12:57 AM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: South Pacific
Posts: 559
|
Quote:
Many of those fore-runner stories could have originated well before 1BC/BCE, too. |
|
04-28-2012, 01:12 AM | #5 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Mornington Peninsula
Posts: 1,306
|
Quote:
|
||
04-28-2012, 01:16 AM | #6 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: England
Posts: 2,527
|
Quote:
|
||
04-28-2012, 01:43 AM | #7 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
|
Quote:
Andrew Criddle |
||
04-28-2012, 01:58 AM | #8 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
|
Quote:
|
|
04-28-2012, 02:01 AM | #9 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: England
Posts: 2,527
|
Quote:
It would indicate that people living prior to 70 c.e., may have been able, depending on how close to the gospel dating they lived, be able to see a reflection of a historical figure within that composite gospel JC figure. A reflection not a corresponding equation, i.e. such and such a historical figure is synonymous with the gospel JC figure. And that, after all is said and done, is nothing more than is sometimes claimed for any literary creation, either by the author/creator or his readers. A created literary figure is able to reflect more than one flesh and blood figure. So, what people back then would have been able to say is, 'ah, I see so and so reflected in that gospel JC story'. Others, perhaps living further back, could say they remember the history of such and such a figure - and that that historical figure is also seen to be reflected within the gospel JC story. That's why, in time, when history became distant and foggy, that the gospel JC story itself became viewed as history. History was 'lost' - and the gospel mythologizing of history became viewed as history. (of course, with a little bit of help from Josephus and his 'historical' reconstructions/interpretations....) |
|||
04-28-2012, 02:36 AM | #10 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Mornington Peninsula
Posts: 1,306
|
Thank you. I read that several times before I gained some glimmer. We progress!
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|