FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-08-2005, 05:58 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sounding trumpets outside the walls of Louisville
Posts: 2,242
Default

Also, moose, we must be careful to not put into the bible things that it does not say. It does not say, "God created light and darkness and that those rotated by God's will to from[sic] night and day." It does say, (gen1:3), 'And god said, let there be light, and there was light. God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness...' It does not say that the light and darkness rotated according to god's will,we assume that in order to make the bible fit what we see as a logical order. The bible is not logical, and the men who wrote it saw no need to make it work logically, and even if they did see a need they didn't have the knowledge to make it so.
mrunicycler is offline  
Old 07-08-2005, 10:31 PM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 8,254
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moosemaster1341
I personally prefer to think that while the bible is the word of God, it was also written by man, and therefore not without error. Also, can you give me an exact reference as to where I can find that information in Genesis? If it's the King James version, don't even bother, cause I'll just shoot that one down. The King James was put into Modern English from the Older version, too many typos and errors (Look into Psalm 46). While I'm not a Christian I do reserve the right to say this if you smash my argument: It's freaking God, it doesn't need the sun and moon to make night and day. I was also under the impression that there was darkness until God did the whole "Let there Be Light" thing, and they might have been just talking about time instead of variations in lighting with night and day.
Moosemaster1341,
...hmmm...Come here for a moment...Have a seat...Think about it for just a moment...
"The word of God...written by man...with errors..."
Written by man,yes... But "the word of God",...nah...
I know it's hard to internalize THAT after all these years of endoctrination.
...God dictating a book...Think...Think!!!... :huh:
Sorry,but no...
Time to stop lying to ourselves...

"Ok,ok...Word of God, but with many errors...Deal: dictated by God but I concede "with errors" because of the stupid idiot who was taking dictation..."
Stupid idiot who was personally selected by God to take his dictation...

....Think!!...Really??? :huh:
Thomas II is offline  
Old 07-09-2005, 12:04 AM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,043
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magus55
The light was cast over half of the Earth leaving the other half dark.
Doesn't work. The texts specifically use "dawning" and "setting". As usual, reading allegory too literally leads to nothing but trouble...
Wallener is offline  
Old 07-09-2005, 10:52 AM   #14
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida, the United States of America.
Posts: 28
Default

Thomas - That's pretty much an argument against a certain aspect of religion (claiming something that a faith holds as true, to be false). I make it a point not to really argue for or against religion. I'll argue on certain aspects of historical context or interpretation of religion, but not directly for or against religion. So yes, maybe the bible was the word of God, maybe it wasn't.
moosemaster1341 is offline  
Old 07-09-2005, 11:34 AM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 8,254
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moosemaster1341
Thomas - That's pretty much an argument against a certain aspect of religion (claiming something that a faith holds as true, to be false). I make it a point not to really argue for or against religion. I'll argue on certain aspects of historical context or interpretation of religion, but not directly for or against religion. So yes, maybe the bible was the word of God, maybe it wasn't.
There is enormous implication if it isn't the word of god...

"This painting here was painted by Picasso..."
"Are you sure?"
"Well, no..."

"Ah...well."
Thomas II is offline  
Old 07-09-2005, 01:35 PM   #16
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida, the United States of America.
Posts: 28
Default

The church is no stranger to enormous implications that it can't back up.
moosemaster1341 is offline  
Old 07-09-2005, 01:41 PM   #17
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 9,584
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magus55
Light existed before there was a sun. The light was cast over half of the Earth leaving the other half dark.
Wallener's point notwithstanding, where did the light come from and where did it go?

Light is a perfectly quantifiable 'thing' that had to radiate from something.
Matt the Medic is offline  
Old 07-09-2005, 11:33 PM   #18
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Monroeville, Ohio, USA
Posts: 440
Default

the sun and moon and stars are humans (and so are the animals Adam named).


Gen 37:09 And he dreamed yet another dream, and told it his
brethren, and said, Behold, I have dreamed a dream more;
and, behold, the sun and the moon and the eleven stars
made obeisance to me.



offa
offa is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:44 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.