![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#121 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,101
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#122 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: On a sailing ship to nowhere, leaving any place
Posts: 2,254
|
![]() Quote:
What is a rainbow? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#123 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 814
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#124 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,101
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#125 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#126 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: US
Posts: 288
|
![]()
Xixax:
The objections you raise are pretty common ones. I have seen all of these debated before and I think some are good and others are rather weak. But since several of them could get into a rather lengthy discussion I will answer them one at a time. Quote:
The reason I find it hard to believe that Christianity would have made it past the first century is because the very belief itself stands or falls on the question of miracles and specifically on the resurrection. I havent seen any religions (or myths) that are similar in this regard. The claims were of current miracles taking place, not past events. Vast distances? Lack of eye witnesses? These people didnt live in a vacuum. Christ didnt perform miracles once or twice but so often that one would think such claims of miracles done to specific people in specific places (many of them well known to the public) with very large groups witnessing the events, would be rather easily dealt with by the critics of Christ. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#127 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#128 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
![]()
God uses a rainbow as his convenant to never flood the Earth again. If the flood was only local, why are there still local floods to this day?
But, if "earth" was limited to the extent that Heathen described, God could keep the promise by not flooding that entire region again, while still allowing (or causing) local floods in other areas, could he not? Or, as another solution, the local floods we see to this day could be floods not directly caused by God, as the Noahic Flood supposedly was. In either case, your Rainbow argument for a Global Flood does not seem to float. |
![]() |
![]() |
#129 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
![]() Quote:
Were you around 4000 years ago to see if rainbows did not exist, BTW? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#130 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: On a sailing ship to nowhere, leaving any place
Posts: 2,254
|
![]() Quote:
And maybe little faeries paint dew droplets on flowers in the wee hours of the morning, rather than water condensing on the petals due to temperature. And maybe your mother found you in a cabbage patch and decided to take you home with her, instead of her and your father producing you through sex. The "maybe" game you play, Magus55, gets people no where in a big hurry. All you've demonstrated is you are scared shitless by the thought of eternal damnation, and so you are covering your buttocks by trusting blindly a mythology that has a distant, tenuous connection to your ancestors' mythology. |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|