FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Non Abrahamic Religions & Philosophies
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-28-2003, 02:04 PM   #121
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,101
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
Thats all fine and good, until you look at these verses:
.....God uses a rainbow as his convenant to never flood the Earth again. If the flood was only local, why are there still local floods to this day?

Here is biblical evidence for a global flood covering the entire Earth.
http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-c005.html
It would be great if you would take this to another thread. Perhaps even going back to threads where you have already brought this up only to have it thrashed soundly? No need to pollute this one even further. Maybe you can chime in on the resurrection a little?
Xixax is offline  
Old 08-28-2003, 02:04 PM   #122
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: On a sailing ship to nowhere, leaving any place
Posts: 2,254
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
[BGod uses a rainbow as his convenant to never flood the Earth again. If the flood was only local, why are there still local floods to this day?[/B]
Here's a much better explanation as to why rainbows exist:

What is a rainbow?
Demigawd is offline  
Old 08-28-2003, 02:06 PM   #123
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 814
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Biff the unclean
The problem with this is that "biblical" evidence is merely evidence of what happens in the bible.
The conjecture that the bible story is tied to some local flood vaguely remembered from the end of the last Ice Age ties the story to reality.
Your web link denys this link.
Therefore leaving as the only possibility that the Noah's flood is only a silly folk tale.
I think his post here is about why if one believes the Bible then one must believe the flood was global, not about anything extra-Biblical. In other words, one of his assumptions is that the Bible is true, so arguing that it's not is not relevant to this particular point. I tend to agree with Magus on this point, while not believing there was a global flood or any other such thing myself.
Mullibok is offline  
Old 08-28-2003, 02:06 PM   #124
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,101
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Demigawd
Here's a much better explanation as to why rainbows exist:

What is a rainbow?
*sits back to see if Magus produces Irreducible Complexity arguments to show that Rainbows are obviously in the domain of ID and not a result of natural processes*
Xixax is offline  
Old 08-28-2003, 02:06 PM   #125
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Biff the unclean
The problem with this is that "biblical" evidence is merely evidence of what happens in the bible.
The conjecture that the bible story is tied to some local flood vaguely remembered from the end of the last Ice Age ties the story to reality.
Your web link denys this link.
Therefore leaving as the only possibility that the Noah's flood is only a silly folk tale.
Heathen stated that the flood of the Bible could have been local, since the middle east was the farthest extent that people of the time knew of. I showed reasons why it couldn't have, and since we are discussing the Biblical flood, biblical evidence is valid. How about you butt out Biff? Your claims of, this isn't real cause I said so, don't serve much purpose other than making you look arrogant.
Magus55 is offline  
Old 08-28-2003, 02:10 PM   #126
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: US
Posts: 288
Default

Xixax:

The objections you raise are pretty common ones. I have seen all of these debated before and I think some are good and others are rather weak. But since several of them could get into a rather lengthy discussion I will answer them one at a time.

Quote:
Originally posted by Xixax
I take it this immediately also provides evidence for all other religions making it past their first century as true for you? And if so, why is it they are contradictory?

Claims of the supernatural were not uncommon in the first century regardless, I just find the reasoning stated above rather weak. Of course there were claims of supernatural events, but none that could be refuted considering the vast distances and lack of eye witnesses that would have been opposed, even if a historical Jesus was walking around at the time.
The arguments against a historical Jesus are rather weak IMO, so Ill only go into that if you really want to. But answering the "all religions make supernatural claims"....

The reason I find it hard to believe that Christianity would have made it past the first century is because the very belief itself stands or falls on the question of miracles and specifically on the resurrection. I havent seen any religions (or myths) that are similar in this regard. The claims were of current miracles taking place, not past events. Vast distances? Lack of eye witnesses? These people didnt live in a vacuum. Christ didnt perform miracles once or twice but so often that one would think such claims of miracles done to specific people in specific places (many of them well known to the public) with very large groups witnessing the events, would be rather easily dealt with by the critics of Christ.
Warcraft3 is offline  
Old 08-28-2003, 02:10 PM   #127
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Xixax
*sits back to see if Magus produces Irreducible Complexity arguments to show that Rainbows are obviously in the domain of ID and not a result of natural processes*
And maybe God made it so water has a prism effect after the flood. Were you around 4000 years ago to see if Rainbows existed? And no you can't assume that rainbows have been occuring since the beginning of time, since you have no clue.
Magus55 is offline  
Old 08-28-2003, 02:13 PM   #128
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

God uses a rainbow as his convenant to never flood the Earth again. If the flood was only local, why are there still local floods to this day?

But, if "earth" was limited to the extent that Heathen described, God could keep the promise by not flooding that entire region again, while still allowing (or causing) local floods in other areas, could he not?

Or, as another solution, the local floods we see to this day could be floods not directly caused by God, as the Noahic Flood supposedly was.

In either case, your Rainbow argument for a Global Flood does not seem to float.
Mageth is offline  
Old 08-28-2003, 02:15 PM   #129
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
And maybe God made it so water has a prism effect after the flood. Were you around 4000 years ago to see if Rainbows existed? And no you can't assume that rainbows have been occuring since the beginning of time, since you have no clue.
That's gotta be one of the most idiotic arguments I've ever seen. And pardon me, no offense intended.

Were you around 4000 years ago to see if rainbows did not exist, BTW?
Mageth is offline  
Old 08-28-2003, 02:15 PM   #130
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: On a sailing ship to nowhere, leaving any place
Posts: 2,254
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
And maybe God made it so water has a prism effect after the flood. Were you around 4000 years ago to see if Rainbows existed? And no you can't assume that rainbows have been occuring since the beginning of time, since you have no clue.
*LOL!!!*

And maybe little faeries paint dew droplets on flowers in the wee hours of the morning, rather than water condensing on the petals due to temperature. And maybe your mother found you in a cabbage patch and decided to take you home with her, instead of her and your father producing you through sex.

The "maybe" game you play, Magus55, gets people no where in a big hurry. All you've demonstrated is you are scared shitless by the thought of eternal damnation, and so you are covering your buttocks by trusting blindly a mythology that has a distant, tenuous connection to your ancestors' mythology.
Demigawd is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:19 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.