FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-12-2011, 03:32 AM   #1
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default Resurrecting/Examining the rejected Leucius legend (author of main apocryphal acts)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chocky View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Perhaps you would be able to advise me how Bremmer deals with the legend of the traditionally attributed author Leucius Charinus to these main acts. As I understand it, Leucius as the pseudonymous author of the main non canonical acts is rarely mentioned by academics and scholars anymore, and I suspect that this theory of authorship (for the main acts) is now not being pursued. Would this be correct?
That's right, and as Bremmer says the Leucius legend has long since been rejected, mainly because arguing that one person wrote all the major apocryphal acts just falls at the first hurdle of historical-critical scholarship - the acts have very different and incompatible theological concerns from each other (docetic/Gnostic, encratite, and vaguely proto-orthodox).
Could you or anyone else point me at any JSTOR articles or google books related to this rejection of the Leucius legend. I would like to see how they deal with the evidence of the appearance of this name in the later 4th century, and subsequent centuries concluding with Photius's direct citation many centuries later.

Many thanks.
mountainman is offline  
Old 09-12-2011, 05:22 AM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default Chronological index of Ancient Historical Mention for Leucius (Charinus)

The Sources that mention Leucius (Charinus)
("The Shadowy author of Tall Apocryphal Tales")

Chronological index of Ancient Historical Mention

n.b. * denotes mention of name(s)

0180 ... Irenaeus' Adversus haereses - no mention of names
0220 ... Hippolytus (disciple of Irenaeus) The Refutation of all Heresies - no mention of names
0220 ... Tertullian The Prescription against Heretics - the author of the Acts of Paul was "a presbyter in Asia" !!
0325 ... Eusebius' Historia Ecclesiastica - on "Heretical books" - no mention of names, but cites the titles of texts by "Leucius"
0325 * Eusebius' Historia Ecclesiastica - and the fiasco over The Forged Acts of Pilate, where "Leucius and Charinus" visit the underworld.
0370 ... Ephraem - "these Acts were written by Bardesanites" - no author name mentioned [Source (1)]
0375 ... Amphilochius of Iconium - certain heretical writings were "not the Acts of the Apostles, but accounts of demons".
0377 *. Epiphanius "Against Heresies" - makes the first explicit reference to the name Leucius - "a disciple of John"
0385 ... Pacian (bishop of Barcelona 365-391 CE) (3 Ep. i. ad Sympr., c. 2.)
0387 ... Philastrius of Brescia - testifies to the use of apocryphal acts among the Manichaeans. (De haeresibus 88)
0399 *. Augustine Contra Faustum Manichaeum (22:79) identified the author "Leucius", a "cobbler of fables".
0??? * Euodius De fide contra Manichaeos (38) identifies the author as "Leucius".
0400 ... Jerome repeats Tertullian, with the addition that the judgment of the priest took place in the presence of the Apostle John, an assertion which is surely erroneous. [Source 3]
0410 *. Pope Innocent I. declared that Leucius was the author of both the Acts of Peter and the Acts of John. [Source 2]
0450 *. Turibius of Astorga - identifies Acts of Andrew, John, Thomas, mentions Leucius, as the author of the Acts of John.
0451 ... Pope Leo I ( Council of Chalcedon) on the "Leucian Acts": "they should be utterly swept away and burned". [HURST]
0491 *. Decretum Gelasianum (4th century?) - in no uncertain terms states that "Leucius is the disciple of the devil"
0590 ... Gregory of Tours epitomed (and censored) the Acts of Andrew, but does not mention the author.
0787 ... Second Council of Nicaea - "Acts of John" as "this abominable book" - "Let no one read it; and not only so, but we judge it is worthy of being committed to the flames."
0845 *. Photios I of Constantinople - reports that the author is Leucius Charinus, and his books as the "source and mother of all heresy"
1920 ... WACE on Leucius - Background Summary


Quote:
Originally Posted by Photius
Photius' BIBLIOTHECA OR MYRIOBIBLON
114. [Lucius Charinus, Circuits of the Apostles: Acts of Peter,
Acts of John, Acts of Andrew, Acts of Thomas, Acts of Paul]


Read a book entitled Circuits [1] of the Apostles, comprising the Acts of Peter,
John, Andrew, Thomas, and Paul, the author being one Lucius Charinus, [2] as
the work itself shows.
Can anyone furnish any additional references?
mountainman is offline  
Old 09-12-2011, 05:35 AM   #3
avi
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Location: eastern North America
Posts: 1,468
Default

terrific research, Pete. Thanks for that.

avi
avi is offline  
Old 09-12-2011, 06:07 AM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by avi View Post
terrific research, Pete. Thanks for that.
You're welcome avi.

The Jesusland is Zombieland thread provided some very interesting statistics on "the revised revivified body count" of 29 to 9 in favor of the noncanonical crew. We only have one name provided by the victors of the conflict between the victorious canon following people and the gnostic heretics (i.e. the noncanonical crew). And that name also happens to be the names of both of the two zombies who, according to the text itself, authored the "Acts of Pilate".

It's a mystery waiting to be solved, since the name does not appear until the later 4th century, although the legend of an author represented in the writings of Tertullian is explicitly corroborated (and elaborated upon) by Jerome. Eusebius explicitly tells us he is going to name names of these vile heretics, but fails to do so, although it is not improbable that the preservers of Eusebius expunged names of the Gnostic author or authors.
mountainman is offline  
Old 09-17-2011, 11:33 PM   #5
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Another two mentions of the full name "Leucius Charinus"


0400 * Faustas of Milevas refers to a collection of the five major Apocyrphal Acts, by a certain Leucius Charinus, a Manichaean.

0400 * Philaster refers to a collection of the five major Apocyrphal Acts, by a certain Leucius Charinus, a Manichaean.


SOURCE: The apocryphal acts of Thomas By Jan N. Bremmer
mountainman is offline  
Old 09-18-2011, 12:44 AM   #6
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Gnosticism: New Light on the Ancient Tradition of Inner Knowing - By Stephan A. Hoeller (2002).

The author apparently thinks that Leucius is an historical figure who wrote c.130 CE. This date seems very early. It relies on two sets of testimony -

(1) Tertullian's comments about the "Acts of Paul" and
(2) Jerome's embellishment c.400 CE, that Leucius was the disciple of John, an embellishment which many commentators claim to be "surely erroneous".

Quote:

"Leucius Charinus was apparently a young man in his early twenties when he sat at the feet of the aged St. John, who communicated to him many of his great visions and Gnostic experiences, along with the lesser-known details of the lives of the other apostles. Leucius wrote the five Acts probably around 130 CE, several decades after the death of St. John. We know little else about Leucius's life, but his place is assured among the early teachers of Gnosticism."
mountainman is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:18 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.