FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-01-2008, 05:51 PM   #61
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman
You're right the prophecies of the Messiah have not been fulfilled.
Why does the Bible contain 100% disputable prophecies? Is it your position that a loving, rational God would make 100% disputable prophecies when he could easily make 100% indisputable prophecies? If Jesus had predicted when and where some natural disasters would occur, very few people would have disputed that he could predict the future.

In your naivity, you are not aware that a being's character is much more important than his power is. Even if a being is able to predict the future, if he always makes disputable prophecies, which needlessly invite dissent instead of discourage dissent, that would mean that he has poor character. Since the Bible implies that God has good character, obviously, the God of the Bible does not exist.

If you had been taken as a baby to Iran, and had been raised by Muslim parents, you would probably be a Muslim today. Why is that? Obviously, because it is not wanting to know the truth that determines whether or not a person becomes a Christian, but at least primarily what worldview a person's parents have, and where a person lives.

Since you know that you are not a good debater, you frequently avoid directly replying to my arguments. That is very good for skepticism because most people interpret evasiveness as weakness.

One wonders to what extent you will go to embarrass yourself more than you already have.
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 04-01-2008, 05:53 PM   #62
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

If a God inspired the Bible, obviously, he would easily be able to inspire prophecies that very few people would dispute. If a God inspired the Bible, why doesn't he do that?
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 04-02-2008, 06:54 AM   #63
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: georgia
Posts: 2,726
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazarus Long View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post

The Ottomans were not Arabs they were Turkish people these are Europeans not Arabs,
The prophecy did not say "by the Arabs", it is implied that it would be by "my community", ie, followers of Islam. Do you happen to know what religion the Ottoman empire was? Do you need a hint? How about that crescent moon on the Empire's flag?




To be precise, this particular prophecy was not in the Qu'ran, it is contained in one of the many Hadith about Muhammad.


Quote:
And another thing what does grammer have to do with Truth?
What is "grammer?" I said "grammar."

LL



The Hadiths are Oral reports about things that Muhammed supposedly did or said. The prophecies of the biblical prohets were written down on documents immediatly following these revelations unlike the Hadiths. So tell me when did this Hadith prophecy show up on an actual document?


And by the way "my community" is contained in brackets so which shows to me that it is not original or least added later.


And the fact remains the turks are not Arabs but Europeans.
sugarhitman is offline  
Old 04-02-2008, 07:08 AM   #64
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: georgia
Posts: 2,726
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFungus420 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post
Um the Quran was written AFTER Muhammed, wheares the bible was written way before Jesus.
No, it wasn't.

It was compiled by the Council of Nicea about 3 centuries after the time in which Jesus was supposed to have lived.

The Council decided which of the hundreds of stories, books, gospels, etc. would be included in the Bible and which would be omitted.

So, it was at least 3 centuries after the fact that a group of men got together and made the Bible.



Kind of like how the Bible is filled with plagarised stories from the more ancient mythologies?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post
So sorry these prophecies of the Quran does not even began to hold a candle to those of the bible....and you very well know it.
They are equally vague, equally reliable.

The only reason that you give more credence to the Bible than the Quran is that the Bible is the one in which you believe.
So are these bibles that were made at Nicea the same as the KJV or Catholic versions. Why then also does the KJV not contain the same stories as the Catholic bibles? And also the fact that there were documents in existence that enabled the Council "to choose" between them shows well that they did not "create" the bible, because the documents were already in existence. Also the early christians had these documents as well. (The Gospels originated from them and not the Council)


The KJV is the best translation we have, the other books contains many errors, and the Catholic bible includes other books which are not considered true. If the early christians were here today they would choose the KJV.


I am about to open a thread about this false saying that bible prophecy is vague....it is not.
sugarhitman is offline  
Old 04-02-2008, 07:11 AM   #65
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wherever God takes me
Posts: 5,242
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazarus Long View Post

The prophecy did not say "by the Arabs", it is implied that it would be by "my community", ie, followers of Islam. Do you happen to know what religion the Ottoman empire was? Do you need a hint? How about that crescent moon on the Empire's flag?




To be precise, this particular prophecy was not in the Qu'ran, it is contained in one of the many Hadith about Muhammad.




What is "grammer?" I said "grammar."

LL



The Hadiths are Oral reports about things that Muhammed supposedly did or said. The prophecies of the biblical prohets were written down on documents immediatly following these revelations unlike the Hadiths. So tell me when did this Hadith prophecy show up on an actual document?


And by the way "my community" is contained in brackets so which shows to me that it is not original or least added later.


And the fact remains the turks are not Arabs but Europeans.
http://www.islamreligion.com/articles/347/

The Twofold Prophecy

Before the rise of Islam, the Romans and the Persians were two competing superpowers. Romans were led by Heraclius (610–641 CE), a Christian Emperor, whereas the Persians were Zoroastrians led by Khosrow Parviz (reigned 590–628 CE), under whom the empire achieved its greatest expansion.

In 614, the Persians conquered Syria and Palestine, taking Jerusalem, destroying the Holy Sepulcher and the ‘True Cross’ carried to Ctesiphon. Then, in 619, they occupied Egypt and Libya. Heraclius met them at Thracian Heraclea (617 or 619), but they sought to capture him, and he rode madly back to Constantinople, hotly pursued.[2]

The Muslims were grieved by the Roman defeat as they felt spiritually closer to Christian Rome than Zoroastrian Persia, but the Meccans were naturally buoyed up by the victory of pagan Persia. To Meccans, the Roman humiliation was a sinister omen of the defeat of the Muslims at pagan hands. At the time God’s prophecy comforted the faithful:

“The Romans have been defeated - in a land close by; but they, (even) after (this) defeat of theirs, will soon be victorious- within ten years. With God is the Decision, in the past and in the future: on that Day shall the believers rejoice with the help of God. He helps whom He will, and He is the Mighty, the Most-Merciful.” (Quran 30:2-4)

The Quran made a prophecy of two victories:

(i) The future Roman victory within ten years over Persians, something unimaginable at the time

(ii) The joy of the faithful on a victory over the pagans

Both of these prophecies actually occured.

In 622, Heraclius left Constantinople as prayers rose from its many sanctuaries for victory over the Persian Zoroastrians and the reconquest of Jerusalem. He devoted the next two years to campaigns in Armenia. In 627, he met the Persians near Nineveh. There, he killed three Persian generals in single combat, killed the Persian commander, and scattered the Persian host. A month later, Heraclius entered Dastagird with its stupendous treasure. Khosrow was overthrown by his son, who made peace with Heraclius. Returning to Constantinople in triumph, Heraclius was hailed as a hero.[3]

Also, in the year 624 AH, Muslims defeated the Meccans in the first and decisive Battle at Badr.

In the words of an Indian scholar:

“…a single line of prophecy was related to four nations and the fate of two great empires. All this proves the Holy Quran to be the Book of God.”[4]


You a Muslim now? Or are you trying to find a way to explain it away like the skeptics do?

When will you admit God doesn't interfere in the natural world and people write down vague things?
Self-Mutation is offline  
Old 04-02-2008, 07:14 AM   #66
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wherever God takes me
Posts: 5,242
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFungus420 View Post

No, it wasn't.

It was compiled by the Council of Nicea about 3 centuries after the time in which Jesus was supposed to have lived.

The Council decided which of the hundreds of stories, books, gospels, etc. would be included in the Bible and which would be omitted.

So, it was at least 3 centuries after the fact that a group of men got together and made the Bible.



Kind of like how the Bible is filled with plagarised stories from the more ancient mythologies?



They are equally vague, equally reliable.

The only reason that you give more credence to the Bible than the Quran is that the Bible is the one in which you believe.
So are these bibles that were made at Nicea the same as the KJV or Catholic versions. Why then also does the KJV not contain the same stories as the Catholic bibles? And also the fact that there were documents in existence that enabled the Council "to choose" between them shows well that they did not "create" the bible, because the documents were already in existence. Also the early christians had these documents as well. (The Gospels originated from them and not the Council)


The KJV is the best translation we have, the other books contains many errors, and the Catholic bible includes other books which are not considered true. If the early christians were here today they would choose the KJV.


I am about to open a thread about this false saying that bible prophecy is vague....it is not.
Please stop viewing God as a little kid who can't do anything right. If the KJV Bible was so great, Jesus would've handed them out when he visited Earth. He wouldn't have waited until the 1600's to have the book written. He is God, remember?

You keep claiming prophecy isn't vague, but then whine and cry when asked why God doesn't reveal exact dates if he is truly God.

You keep trying to belittle God and make him sound like a big fat idiot. He is not. God is beyond prophecy and stop trying to bring him down.
Self-Mutation is offline  
Old 04-02-2008, 07:15 AM   #67
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 214
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post

The prophecies of the biblical prohets were written down on documents immediatly following these revelations unlike the Hadiths.
No they weren't. Please research this.
tonan22 is offline  
Old 04-02-2008, 07:18 AM   #68
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: the north
Posts: 12,935
Default



Zee stock market...she shall rise...........just give it enough time

Bunch of fools.
Trout is offline  
Old 04-02-2008, 07:18 AM   #69
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: West Virginina
Posts: 4,349
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by funinspace View Post
Even the conservative New Bible Commentary, acknowledges that the date of authorship of Daniel is highly debated within the Christian world. We atheists, don’t even need to make an argument here, as you cannot even convince all your fellow believers.



:rolling: Maybe you should check out the maps regarding the Ottoman Empire or even the USSR.



And the below Yahweh statements concerning Israel have failed:

Ge 17:5 Neither shall thy name any more be called Abram, but thy name shall be Abraham; for a father of many nations have I made thee. 17:6 And I will make thee exceeding fruitful, and I will make nations of thee, and kings shall come out of thee. 17:7 And I will establish my covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be a God unto thee, and to thy seed after thee. 17:8 And I will give unto thee, and to thy seed after thee, the land wherein thou art a stranger, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession; and I will be their God. 17:9 And God said unto Abraham, Thou shalt keep my covenant therefore, thou, and thy seed after thee in their generations.
Ge 48:3 And Jacob said unto Joseph, God Almighty appeared unto me at Luz in the land of Canaan, and blessed me, 48:4 And said unto me, Behold, I will make thee fruitful, and multiply thee, and I will make of thee a multitude of people; and will give this land to thy seed after thee for an everlasting possession.
1 Chronicals 16:16 Even of the covenant which he made with Abraham, and of his oath unto Isaac; 16:17 And hath confirmed the same to Jacob for a law, and to Israel for an everlasting covenant, 16:18 Saying, Unto thee will I give the land of Canaan, the lot of your inheritance;

Hum…I think the Jews were kicked out of Israel for quite a while; that wasn’t quite everlasting. Batting 50/50, for a god, that kind of sucks…


Prove??? ROTFLMAO…you sound about as rational as those hard core atheist who think they can prove that no god exists… Personally, I prefer the words possible, plausible, and probable; but that probably doesn’t fit in your black and white world too well.
um, the Ottomans considered themselves to be the inheriters of the Byzantine Roman empire. And they are the people who once made up the Eastern Roman emipre. The Roman empire was mainly Latin and Greek. Um you do realize that Russia or the USSR is a European power as well as was the Ottomans right? The Europeans and the Romans are the same.


Also you are very ignorant (which is more than likely intentional) about Israel the promise will not be fulfilled until the return of the Messiah.

Care to try again?
yup how about the Iroquois? Again let me explain in terms you may understand. your hand is proof you have your right hand, however, it is not proof you masturbated 6 years ago. Israel is proof the country exist (your hand) that only. not that some bronze age god exists (your flotsam).
WVIncagold is offline  
Old 04-02-2008, 07:35 AM   #70
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: georgia
Posts: 2,726
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Self-Mutation View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post




The Hadiths are Oral reports about things that Muhammed supposedly did or said. The prophecies of the biblical prohets were written down on documents immediatly following these revelations unlike the Hadiths. So tell me when did this Hadith prophecy show up on an actual document?


And by the way "my community" is contained in brackets so which shows to me that it is not original or least added later.


And the fact remains the turks are not Arabs but Europeans.
http://www.islamreligion.com/articles/347/

The Twofold Prophecy

Before the rise of Islam, the Romans and the Persians were two competing superpowers. Romans were led by Heraclius (610–641 CE), a Christian Emperor, whereas the Persians were Zoroastrians led by Khosrow Parviz (reigned 590–628 CE), under whom the empire achieved its greatest expansion.

In 614, the Persians conquered Syria and Palestine, taking Jerusalem, destroying the Holy Sepulcher and the ‘True Cross’ carried to Ctesiphon. Then, in 619, they occupied Egypt and Libya. Heraclius met them at Thracian Heraclea (617 or 619), but they sought to capture him, and he rode madly back to Constantinople, hotly pursued.[2]

The Muslims were grieved by the Roman defeat as they felt spiritually closer to Christian Rome than Zoroastrian Persia, but the Meccans were naturally buoyed up by the victory of pagan Persia. To Meccans, the Roman humiliation was a sinister omen of the defeat of the Muslims at pagan hands. At the time God’s prophecy comforted the faithful:

“The Romans have been defeated - in a land close by; but they, (even) after (this) defeat of theirs, will soon be victorious- within ten years. With God is the Decision, in the past and in the future: on that Day shall the believers rejoice with the help of God. He helps whom He will, and He is the Mighty, the Most-Merciful.” (Quran 30:2-4)

The Quran made a prophecy of two victories:

(i) The future Roman victory within ten years over Persians, something unimaginable at the time

(ii) The joy of the faithful on a victory over the pagans

Both of these prophecies actually occured.

In 622, Heraclius left Constantinople as prayers rose from its many sanctuaries for victory over the Persian Zoroastrians and the reconquest of Jerusalem. He devoted the next two years to campaigns in Armenia. In 627, he met the Persians near Nineveh. There, he killed three Persian generals in single combat, killed the Persian commander, and scattered the Persian host. A month later, Heraclius entered Dastagird with its stupendous treasure. Khosrow was overthrown by his son, who made peace with Heraclius. Returning to Constantinople in triumph, Heraclius was hailed as a hero.[3]

Also, in the year 624 AH, Muslims defeated the Meccans in the first and decisive Battle at Badr.

In the words of an Indian scholar:

“…a single line of prophecy was related to four nations and the fate of two great empires. All this proves the Holy Quran to be the Book of God.”[4]


You a Muslim now? Or are you trying to find a way to explain it away like the skeptics do?

When will you admit God doesn't interfere in the natural world and people write down vague things?


Ha, ha! Muhammed did not begin his revelations until 610 A.D. the Quran was not created until about 635 A.D. in other words these prophecies and "fulfillments" occured during the events and are very short ranged. The bible prophets foretold things thousands of years in advanced. They were long dead when most of the prophecies were fulfilled. You cannot even begin to compare the Quran with the bible. Can you cite one in the Quran, that fortold things to come thousand or hundreds of years away? And that have been fulfilled? No you cannot. There is no other Book like the Bible....there are no other prophets like the prophets of the Bible....There is no God besisdes the one revealed in the Bible. :wave:
sugarhitman is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:25 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.