FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-25-2005, 09:20 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,890
Default context of literal Genesis

Does anyone know the Hebrew word used in Genesis that implies a literal history? I used to know it, but lost it.
FatherMithras is offline  
Old 10-26-2005, 09:34 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,890
Default

BUMP. I need this for a debate.
FatherMithras is offline  
Old 10-26-2005, 10:19 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
Default

I have no idea if this is what you are after, but could you be referring to the Hebrew word תולדות (generations) in Genesis 2.4?

Ben.
Ben C Smith is offline  
Old 10-27-2005, 03:58 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

You mean the difference between midrash, peshar, etc...? I can't remember the word for the literal history, though, either. Perhaps someone else will.
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 10-27-2005, 06:12 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: home
Posts: 3,715
Default

Chris, peshat means 'simple interpretation', which is the closest to reading with assumption that the events happened, but that is a method of interpretation. Anything in Genesis can in principle be read as 'peshat' or by any of the other methods (allegorical, mystical) but it is up to the reader to choose which reading to use. I don't know of anything in the Genesis text itself that tells you: from this point on, read as 'peshat'.
Anat is offline  
Old 10-27-2005, 06:19 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

No, not in Genesis, but I thought that in Rabbinical commentaries they divided up the interpretations by what kind of interpretation, the pesharim being one, another being literal, etc...
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 10-27-2005, 06:32 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: home
Posts: 3,715
Default

It has more to do with the attitude of the various commentators. Rashi tended to use peshat (that's why Torah with Rashi has been considered the most elementary religious education among haredi circles), Ibn-Ezra was a mystic, etc.
Anat is offline  
Old 10-27-2005, 06:37 PM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

Sorry, but I could have sworn there was a word to denote that kind of literal interpretation. Perhaps I'm wrong, though.
Chris Weimer is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:21 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.