FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-30-2005, 08:53 AM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CJD
Yes, it generally goes like this: God, being transcendent and a se (self-existent), only God could have existed "from all eternity." And they see the Psalmist writing: "Of old you laid the foundation of the earth…they will perish, but you will remain…you are the same and your years have no end" (102:25–27; see also Prov. 8:22–31).

Thus most theologians consider God to be ontologically other—there is no essential co-mingling between the Creator and the creature. This necessarily call for a creation ex nihilo. If this sounds a bit Greekish, well, it is. I personally think ex nihilo is viable, but I'm not quite sure how the Creatorgod relates ontologically to the created. I'm not comfortable with pantheism or monism. Panentheism? I don't know. How about traditional and classical theism, rightly understood (i.e., the balance struck between transcendence and immanence)?
Thanks. That is, more or less, what I thought. What I've never understood, though this is clearly more appropriate for the EoG forum, is how there was a "nothing" from which God could create given that, prior to Creation, God was all that existed. If God was all that existed prior to Creation, there was no "nothing" from which he could create. There was just God. Therefore, the only available "material" would be God. :huh:
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 11-30-2005, 10:42 AM   #12
CJD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: greater Orlando area
Posts: 832
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ConsequentAtheist
On the contrary, it sounds very much like the bombastic hyperbole of a chieftain/king proclaiming to be the first and last of his kind.
Yeah, I'll buy that. Not so sure how it's "on the contrary," though.
CJD is offline  
Old 11-30-2005, 10:46 AM   #13
CJD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: greater Orlando area
Posts: 832
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13
Thanks. That is, more or less, what I thought. What I've never understood, though this is clearly more appropriate for the EoG forum, is how there was a "nothing" from which God could create given that, prior to Creation, God was all that existed. If God was all that existed prior to Creation, there was no "nothing" from which he could create. There was just God. Therefore, the only available "material" would be God. :huh:
This is the dilemma indeed. It seems either creation is ex Deo, OR, God, being by nature self-sacrificial, limited himself (spatially), thereby revealing a void (nihilo) within which he would subsequently create.

CJD
CJD is offline  
Old 11-30-2005, 11:52 AM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,777
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CJD
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by CJD
Also, it seems the plain sense of Isa. 43:10b would be: "No god is older than I." I'm not thinking the ancient Israelite hearer (or reader) would see "before me" as an allusion to a time that YHWH was not. It seems kind of self-defeating.
On the contrary, it sounds very much like the bombastic hyperbole of a chieftain/king proclaiming to be the first and last of his kind.
Yeah, I'll buy that. Not so sure how it's "on the contrary," though.
When BiggestBaddestChiefThatEverWas proclaims:
  • "There was nothing even close to me before I came along, and there will be nothing like me after I'm gone!"
I fully suspect that the listener would take this as a statement about conditions before and after his reign - thereby acknowledging both a 'before' and 'after' - and I see nothing "self-defeating" about it.
Jayhawker Soule is offline  
Old 11-30-2005, 12:08 PM   #15
CJD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: greater Orlando area
Posts: 832
Default

We're bordering on Anselm's argument here: the BiggestBaddestChiefThatEverWas is clearly the one who has always been reigning. Anything less would not be the BiggestBaddestChiefThatEverWas.
CJD is offline  
Old 11-30-2005, 01:06 PM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CJD
This is the dilemma indeed. It seems either creation is ex Deo, OR, God, being by nature self-sacrificial, limited himself (spatially), thereby revealing a void (nihilo) within which he would subsequently create.
When I was a theist, I preferred the former since it implied that the entire universe was not actually separate from God but a differentiated part of that singular Entity. I just liked the way that sounded.
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 12-01-2005, 06:00 PM   #17
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 75
Default

CJD-
Can you tell me if there is any biblical evidence that explicitly spells out creation ex nihilo? Because I couldn't find any. Only 2 passages came close:

Proverbs 8:24-25
"24 When there were no depths (tehomat) I was brought forth, when there were no springs abounding with water. 25 Before the mountains had been shaped, before the hills, I was brought forth;"

This would be a reference to tehomat not being around, but I found out that depths (tehomat) sometimes refers to the oceans as well (Psalms 106). Also, since this is the FIRST thing that Yahweh did, it says the mountains had not been shaped, not that they did not exist, so there was SOMETHING around even if that tehomat is referring to the deep from Gen. 1:1. I would argue it is referring to the oceans in v. 24 since it refers to the deep in the singular later on as Yahweh drawing a circle on it, not creating it.

2 Maccabees 7:28
"28I beg you, my child, to look at the heaven and the earth and see everything that is in them, and recognize that God did not make them out of things that existed.h And in the same way the human race came into being."

This is the prooftext used by Catholics and Eastern Orthodox christians, but one problem with it is that "in the same way the human race came into being", which is NOT ex nihilo in Genesis, it's out of dirt. So, it is either describing a different creation scenario of humans than Genesis, or it's not ex nihilo.
guy_683930 is offline  
Old 12-01-2005, 07:14 PM   #18
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack the Bodiless
The Hebrew "bara" (create) also means cut, or separate. Thus, the "creation" could refer to the separation of the Heavens from the Earth.

I'm wondering if this was the original meaning of the word, and it later gained the "create" meaning because of the later adoption of the "creation ex nihilo" doctrine and the desire to "re-interpret" Genesis 1:1.
But it is. The earth already was but it was a formless wasteland and by dividing it between heaven and earth God created order so light may be perceived in heaven but not on earth. The mighty wind swept over the waters begs for order so that knowledge (illumination) may be received and come to rest in the heavens that later becomes the soul of man.

It is wise to keep an eye on the New heavens and the New Earth where all is the same except that the sea is gone in understanding = intuit knowledge is water become dry land for us to walk on and go by (Rev.21:1). So really, Gen.1 is written not as a historic account but for us to come full circle from chaos (unstructured space is a deluge) to peace of mind.

We are creating heaven and earth here inside the mind of man in Jewish mythology and it doesn't matter how old the earth really is or how many civilizations already existed before this time. So yes, I am a young earther in this sense of the word.
Chili is offline  
Old 12-02-2005, 11:56 AM   #19
CJD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: greater Orlando area
Posts: 832
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by guy_683930
CJD-
Can you tell me if there is any biblical evidence that explicitly spells out creation ex nihilo? Because I couldn't find any.
I don't think there is biblical evidence. As I mentioned previously creation ex nihilo is more or less deduced from a particular axiom, namely, that God is transcendent, or "other." Personally, I don't know where to go on this.

We can add to your list (and I don't think the Proverbs passage you cited bears on ex nihilo anyway): "By faith we understand that the universe was created by the word of God, so that what is seen was not made out of things that are visible" (Heb. 11:3).

Let's suppose this author knew Gen. 1:1–2 well enough. Given that the materials out of which the world as we now know it were brought forth were already there (at the time of Gen. 1:1–2) — in other words, given that Gen. 1:1ff depicts God coming in media res and subduing the watery chaos — maybe the author of Hebrews is simply saying that the universe (including the 'stuff' from which it was formed) was created by divine fiat?

I don't know!
CJD is offline  
Old 12-03-2005, 10:07 AM   #20
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 75
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CJD
We can add to your list (and I don't think the Proverbs passage you cited bears on ex nihilo anyway): "By faith we understand that the universe was created by the word of God, so that what is seen was not made out of things that are visible" (Heb. 11:3).
That could just be creation out of invisible "stuff".
guy_683930 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:12 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.