FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-02-2004, 03:06 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
Default Why did Jesus praise false teachers?

John the Baptist was 'preaching a baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of sins', although 'without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness.'

As John was teaching a false doctrine, why did Jesus praise such a false teacher?

Could it be that the author of Hebrews didn't know what he was talking about, and the central premise of Christianity (that the blood of Jesus is necessary for the forgiveness of sin) is false?
Steven Carr is offline  
Old 04-02-2004, 08:04 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: AZ, u.s.a.
Posts: 1,202
Default

Paul remarked that he rejoiced in anyone preaching Christ. Methinks the apple falls not far from the tree?
Sensei Meela is offline  
Old 04-02-2004, 08:41 AM   #3
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: North West usa
Posts: 10,245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Carr
John the Baptist was 'preaching a baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of sins', although 'without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness.'

As John was teaching a false doctrine, why did Jesus praise such a false teacher?

Could it be that the author of Hebrews didn't know what he was talking about, and the central premise of Christianity (that the blood of Jesus is necessary for the forgiveness of sin) is false?
Since Jesus' mission didn't really kick off until around that moment according to the Bible, and that he didn't die (shed blood) for a couple more years, everyone would still be under the old law. The better question might be towards what was JohnB doing talking about baptism for forgivness of sins, when they should be bringing their favorite eddible animal to the Temple for slaughter. Was it just a new symbolic way of reveling in God or acknowledging him? It seems that allot was going on in that era, and change was in the air, if it ever was really constant.

DK
funinspace is offline  
Old 04-03-2004, 05:07 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,777
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Carr
Could it be that the author of Hebrews didn't know what he was talking about, and the central premise of Christianity (that the blood of Jesus is necessary for the forgiveness of sin) is false?
Jacob Neusner of Bard College argues that expiation through execution has its foundation in Jewish Law:
Quote:
Given the Rabbinic conviction that all Israel possesses a share in the world to come, meaning, nearly everybody will rise from the grave, the sages took as their task a very particular task. It was the specification of how, in this world, criminals/sinners would receive appropriate punishment in a proper procedure, so expiating sin or crime that, in the world to come, they would take their place along with everyone else in the resurrection and eternal life.

It follows that the religious principle that comes to expression in Sanhedrin-Makkot concerns the meaning of man’s being in God’s image. That means, as God lives forever, so it is in man’s nature to surpass the grave. And how, God’s being just, does the sinner or criminal survive his sin or crime? It is by atonement, specifically, paying with his life in the here and now, so that at the resurrection, he may regain life, along with all Israel. That is why the climactic moment in the Halakhah comes at the end of the long catalog of those sins and crimes penalized with capital punishment. It is with ample reason that the Bavli places at the conclusion and climax of its version the ringing declaration: "all Israel has a portion in the world to come, except…." And the exceptions pointedly do not include any of those listed in the long catalogs of persons executed for sins or crimes.

- see A Judaic Reading
If you and I can achieve the expiation of sin through the shedding of blood, perhaps an appropriate proxy could save us the trouble.
Jayhawker Soule is offline  
Old 04-03-2004, 06:25 AM   #5
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: mINNESOTA
Posts: 253
Default

You need to read the gospel again, CA. Jesus said that before He came, John the baptist was the greatest man. But then He said "But I tell you the least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he is." John the baptists knew that the messian was coming and recognized Him when He saw Him. He was at that time, the ONLY person on earth who could do that. That is why Jesus praised Him. John said that "I baptize with water. But there is one whose sandals I am not fit to wear who will baptize you with the Holy Spirit." John made no claims of forgiving people's sins. Only baptizing them with water. Jesus said we need both water and the spirit. Water comes from man and the Spirit comes from God.
Joyfilled is offline  
Old 04-04-2004, 10:11 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joyfilled
John the baptists knew that the messian was coming and recognized Him when He saw Him.
Then why did John still have doubts about Jesus' identity while he was in prison?

And it came to pass, when Jesus had made an end of commanding his twelve disciples, he departed thence to teach and to preach in their cities. Now when John had heard in the prison the works of Christ, he sent two of his disciples, And said unto him, Art thou he that should come, or do we look for another? (Mt 11:1-3, KJV)
Amaleq13 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:38 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.