Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-29-2006, 09:55 AM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: drinking coffee at Cafe Che
Posts: 1,318
|
A question to HJers regarding Jesus' crucifixion
I am a HJer who most certainly does not believe in Jesus' divinity and an agnostic. I do believe that he lived and was crucified, and I could only be vague about Jesus' life. But I must ask, how was Jesus crucified. Could we ever know the details or this will forever be shrouded in mystery? I am asking whether Jesus was crucified with nails through his hands (most likely wrists) and feet or his was simplied left to hang on the cross? Was the crucifixion with nails an interpolation to make the life of Jesus harmonious with the account of Isaiah 53 as Jesus as the Suffering Servant. A cursory glance at the Gospels show that "nails" was not mentioned in Matthew, Mark, and Luke. I wonder if there is a silence regarding this in Paul's letters. Also this question is relevant, as some Christian apologists would point out that Christianity could be falsified if the Apostles see the dead body of Jesus. The body would be decayed if left for a long time, but if he was crucified with nails, it would be easy to discern the marks on his hands and feet.
So what is the evidence that Jesus was crucified with nails? |
07-29-2006, 12:39 PM | #2 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 278
|
Hi Oripahs. In John's gospel, chapter 20, Thomas says that he will not believe unless he sees the nailmarks in Jesus hands. In one of his letters, Paul refers to carrying about on his body the marks of Christ, but he does not elaborate, and he may be speaking metaphorically rather than literally.
Gospel of John was written towards the end of the 1st century CE AT THE EARLIEST. That would indicate that at this time a tradition had arisen that Jesus was nailed to the X. We know from archaological evidence that this was one of the ways the Romans affixed condemned criminals to a cross. I read somewhere that in some cases, the Romans would use both nails and rope. Possibly Jesus hands were tied and his feet nailed? The simple fact is - we don't know. |
07-29-2006, 01:10 PM | #3 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
|
Quote:
Other than that, I think there are writings describing the practice as involving nails but, IIRC, rope was sometimes also involved to avoid having the weight of the victim tear the body free of the nails. |
|
07-29-2006, 01:31 PM | #4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: PA USA
Posts: 5,039
|
|
07-29-2006, 02:21 PM | #5 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
|
Quote:
Ben. |
|
07-29-2006, 03:37 PM | #6 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: drinking coffee at Cafe Che
Posts: 1,318
|
Quote:
|
|
07-29-2006, 03:55 PM | #7 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 3,103
|
Quote:
|
|
07-29-2006, 05:17 PM | #8 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: PA USA
Posts: 5,039
|
Quote:
Roman Nails Most likely, crucifixion was a case of securing the legs with nails and using ropes to secure the arms. At least this is what the evidence seems to indicate. A crucified Jesus would have been both nailed and roped into place. |
|
07-29-2006, 06:16 PM | #9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
|
Thanks for the confirmation, Ben.
It also occurs to me that the addition of ropes would mean that an individual could be nailed through the palms. |
07-29-2006, 06:37 PM | #10 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
|
Quote:
Neither is there any evidence of any group of Judaism believing in a man being the only begotten son of God, or in a virgin birth. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|