Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
11-23-2008, 11:19 AM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
|
Epimenides & Acts 17:28/Titus 1:12
While looking up the alleged pagan writers quoted or alluded to in the NT, one resource says the passage at Acts 17:28, "In him we live and move and have our being" is likely a citation of Epimenides De oraculis/peri Chresmon, while the passage at Titus 1:12 "Cretans are always liars, evil beasts, lazy gluttons" is from Epimenides Cretica.
The problem is this. If you look up the quotes on the Internet, they are both identical: “They fashioned a tomb for thee, O high and holy one, the Cretans, always liars, evil beasts, idle bellies! But thou art not dead; thou livest and abidest forever; for in thee we live and move and have our being.” I'm wondering, now, whether these are actually the same work known under different names by different scholars. Can Roger Pearse, Ben Smith or one of our other resident wags shed any light on this mystery? DCH |
11-23-2008, 03:30 PM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
|
My guess: "Cretica" seems to refer specifically to the poem you give above. Perhaps "De oraculis" was a collection of his writings in which the poem can be found?
|
11-23-2008, 05:33 PM | #3 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Wikipedia attributes both quotes to Cretica, which I gather survives in only a few fragments.
Clement of Alexandria identified the quotes as coming from Epimenides. Jerome identified the particular work as "De oraculis" in his commentary on Titus. The works of Epimenides are not on line that I can find. It appears that most of the source are quoting another source on the identity of the passage. |
11-23-2008, 07:10 PM | #4 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
|
Here are some online versions:
Epimenides (ca. 600 B. C.), writing about the Greek god Zeus in his poem De oraculis/peri Chresmon: “They fashioned a tomb for thee, O high and holy one, the Cretans, always liars, evil beasts, idle bellies! But thou art not dead; thou livest and abidest forever; for in thee we live and move and have our being.”http://www.meridianmagazine.com/gosp...802nt31sf.html Epimenides' poem Cretica is quoted twice in the New Testament. In the poem, Minos addresses Zeus thus:http://www.ellopos.net/elpenor/koino...p?TOPIC_ID=322 42 7. Twice two poets. These are Aratus, Cleanthes, Epimenides, and Menander. The first two are quoted in Acts 17. 28, the third Titus 1.12, and the fourth I Cor. 15.33.http://books.google.com/books?id=z4M...um=1&ct=result 1. (Paul, Epistle to Titus, 1. 12: One of the Cretans, their own prophet, said of them): The Cretans are always liars, evil beasts, lazy stomachs. (Clement says that Paul means Epimenides, Jerome that it came from the Oracles of Epimenides).http://www.sacred-texts.com/cla/app/app05.htm The ultimate source, it seems, is to be found in The Book of the Acts (or via: amazon.co.uk) By Frederick Fyvie Bruce, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1988 (ISBN 0802825052, 9780802825056, 564 pages): Page 339, Note 75: The quatrain is quoted in a Syriac version by the ninth-century commentator Isho'dad (ed. M. D. Gibson, Horae Semiticae, X [Cambridge, 1913], p. 40.) Isho'dad was probably dependent here on Theodore of Mopsuestia (350-428); he reproduces Theodore's use of Diogenes Laertius's story (see p. 336, n. 62) to illustrate the statement "To an Unknown God." The Cretan's claim to be able to point out the tomb of Zeus was felt to be an impious falsehood. The second line of the quatrain is quoted in Tit. 1:12; according to Clement of Alexandria (Miscellanies 1.14.59.1-2) it comes from a work by Epiminedes. A similar sentiment appears in Callimachus's Hymn to Zeus (lines 7-8): "Cretans are always liars: For the Cretans, O King, actually fashioned a tomb for thee. But thou hast not died; thou art for ever." The line here quoted by Paul can with little difficulty be given hexameter form; Cod. D spoils the rhythm by adding "day by day" at the end of it.http://books.google.com/books?id=QE5...sult#PPA339,M1 DCH Quote:
|
|
11-23-2008, 08:48 PM | #5 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
the importance of Crete to the author of Titus and Acts
Dear DCHindley,
The author(s) of Acts 17:28/Titus 1:12 may defer to Crete because of its ancient historical prominence in first the Greek, and then the Roman civilisation during the period from well BCE until the time of the authorship of Titus and Acts. From a totally objective archaeological perspective, the discovery of the Greek law codes of Gortys reinforces the argument that Crete was one of the chief centers of Greek academic culture during this period. The ancient text you cite refers to the tomb of Zeus. That the actual tomb of Zeus (Himself, father of Apollo, father of Asclepius) was by tradition to be located physically on Crete is a claim many researchers and authors have taken seriously, since antiquity. Titus is the christian bishop sent to the heathens of Crete by Paul in the first century tradition as presented in the canonical Acts of the Apostles. I had not realised before that the lines Quote:
Best wishes, Pete |
|
11-24-2008, 07:40 AM | #6 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
|
I looked into this issue (NT quotations of pagan sources) very briefly a while ago, and this is what I found (taken straight from my notes):
Titus 1.12: Callimachus, Hymn to Zeus 1.8; but originally from Epimenides, according to Clement of Alexandria, and possibly modelled on Hesiod, Theogony 26.To unpack this a bit.... It appears that, to follow Clement of Alexandria, Miscellanies 1.14, Epimenides penned the lines about Cretans that we find in Titus 1.12, including the part about laziness and gluttony. But sometimes you will find this verse attributed to Callimachus, Hymn to Zeus (there is also a Classical Quarterly article online that touches on this); however, Callimachus appears to lack the part about laziness and gluttony, so Clement is probably right about the attribution to Epimenides, and Callimachus is probably quoting Epimenides in his own work. The line is similar to something that Hesiod wrote, but not similar enough to indicate that Hesiod himself was in mind in any of our present texts; he was merely the inspiration for the sentiment. Acts 17.28a is found in substance, though not precisely, in the early going of Cleanthes, Hymn to Zeus. But some sources I have seen attribute this line to Epimenides or to Aratus (though I myself cannot seem to find a line close enough in the Phaenomena). Acts 17.28b is prhaps more straightforward, since the saying is found in line 5 of Aratus, Phaenomena. But, again, I have also seen this line attributed to Cleanthes, though I cannot seem to find anything there close enough to override Aratus. 1 Corinthians 15.33 appears to quote fragment 218 of the lost Thaïs of Menander, but (again) I have seen this line also attributed to Euripides (again!). The confusions that mount over these attributions stem, I think, from the following: 1. Some of the works are lost to us, and we depend completely in such cases on attributions made by the church fathers commenting on the NT texts. 2. Some later poets seem to be adapting lines from earlier poets. 3. Two of the poems that arise in these discussions bear the same title, Hymn to Zeus (by Callimachus and by Cleanthes). 4. Many, many of the online discussions do not refer to original sources; any error or conjecture made in one source gets passed on to the next uncritically. I might add that all of these quotations are so short and sweet that Paul and Luke might not have actually consulted the texts in question; they may be simply quoting from memory or from popular lore. That is about all I can do working from internet sources alone. Ben. |
11-24-2008, 04:48 PM | #7 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
|
Thanks Ben.
I have to agree that many online resources and even printed refrence books seem to repeat assertions made at other online sites or other resource books, and virtually none actually tell you where to find the original text or even an English tranlation. This was also the problem I ran into when looking up info about Patmos island. All sources, both internet and printed, asserted quite confidently that Patmos was a place for exiles in Roman times. It took a lot of digging to find that Tacitus mentions three other Aegean islands were so used, but neither he nor any other surviving ancient source confirm "John's" statement that Patmos served this purpose as well. Fun fun. DCH Quote:
|
|
11-26-2008, 04:12 PM | #8 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
|
Interesting that all of these NT quotations of or allusions to Pagan works (except 1 Cor 15:33, Menander, Thais fragment 218 [Kock]) stressed worship of Zeus as a kind of universal god.
If one were to read through volumes 2 & 3.1 of the revised edition of Emil Schurer's Jewish People in the Age of Jesus Christ one can find plenty of inscriptional and literary evidence that many pagans viewed the Jewish God as a manifestation of Zeus, and many Hellenized Jews were willing to let them believe so for the sake of client-patron relationships between Jews and gentiles. Does anyone here think that this kind of pan-universalism influenced some early Christians? I can see it WRT gentile followers of Paul, since I look on his movement as one that promoted closer relationship between gentiles and Jews, with the Christology found in his letters reflecting the beliefs of a radical wing of the gentile followers of Jesus who had already transformed Jesus into a kind of cult figure that might appeal to those who worship the god "Most High" (also, I think, associated with Zeus). DCH Aratus, Phaenomena (1-5): From Zeus let us begin; him do we mortals never leave unnamed;http://www.theoi.com/Text/AratusPhaenomena.html The quatrain [of Epiminedes,[This work apparently attributed the quotation to a work called Cretica.]“They fashioned a tomb for thee, O high and holy one, the Cretans, always liars, evil beasts, idle bellies! But thou art not dead; thou livest and abidest forever; for in thee we live and move and have our being,”]is quoted in a Syriac version by the ninth-century commentator Isho'dad (ed. M. D. Gibson, Horae Semiticae, X [Cambridge, 1913], p. 40.). A similar sentiment appears in Callimachus's Hymn to Zeus (lines 7-8): "Cretans are always liars: For the Cretans, O King, actually fashioned a tomb for thee. But thou hast not died; thou art for ever."Both of the above statements come from The Book of the Acts by Frederick Fyvie Bruce, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1988, Page 339, Note 75 Most glorious of the immortals, invoked by many names, ever all-powerful,Cleanthes' Hymn to Zeus (tr. M. A. C. Ellery, 1976) Cleanthes (331-232 B.C.) was a disciple of Zeno the Stoic. He considered the universe a living being and said that god was the soul of the universe and the sun its heart. http://www.utexas.edu/courses/cityli...thes_hymn.html Quote:
|
|
11-26-2008, 04:26 PM | #9 | ||||
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
Dear DCHindley (and Ben),
Rivetting stuff. Great work. Quote:
This kind of pan-universalism was its trunk. How could the branch of christianity fail to have been influenced? Best wishes, Pete Quote:
In the third century CE the author Philostratus narrates an equivalent belief in his *** history *** of The Life of Apollonius of Tyana where he has the following conversation take place: Quote:
Please note that I refer to the work as a *** history *** because this is precisely what Eusebius calls it dozens of times over in his polemical diatribe against the pagans who followed the son of Apollo, the son of Zeus. Quote:
|
||||
11-27-2008, 05:26 AM | #10 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
|
Quote:
http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/...Osiris*/E.html [Osiris] himself is far removed from the earth, uncontaminated and unpolluted and pure from all matter that is subject to destruction and death; but for the souls of men here, which are compassed about by bodies and emotions, there is no association with this god except in so far as they may attain to a dim vision of his presence by means of the apperception which philosophy affords.This is not so different from the Jewish and Christian philosophers' God, and they all sprang from the same source: the Platonic idea that God must somehow be perfect and beyond this world. This led to a problem, though: it didn't make sense for a perfect and pure God to interact with the temporary and the imperfect, so how did this occur? There were two solutions: 1. A "Logos". This is the utterance from the ineffable God that was the instrument in creating and/or maintaining this world. 2. A "ministering" class of intermediate beings: the daemons. These were beings who floated in the air and around pagan holy sites, and could deliver messages from and to the gods. Some daemons in fact pretended to be the gods themselves. This is the framework in which early Christianity developed. The Logos became associated with Christ, and the daemons with devils and angels. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|