Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
08-26-2005, 11:01 AM | #31 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 8,254
|
Quote:
Regarding your question, "good" or "bad" are relative terms that would not apply to a god who is said to transcend the relative world. I don't have a concept of the religious god. To me to say that god is good is like saying the law of gravity is good...In itself it is neither good nor bad. It simply is. Some see that neutrality as "good" because at least it has no bad intentions. |
|
08-26-2005, 01:21 PM | #32 | |||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 540
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
(Originally Posted by jemand but I also believe that that experience was clouded by their personal culture and biases, and the fact that they had to explain themselves using human language, which may not be able to convey much of the truth about God.) Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
08-26-2005, 02:33 PM | #33 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,952
|
Quote:
I don't suppose the consistent answer to most atheists, "its your defiance" , catches your attention. Your questions are expressions of defiance and nothing less. And not getting the answers you demand you can say "see I'm right". If you're so right, why not just get on with your life then and forget all this nonesense, or are you waiting with the reindeer...on the roof and full of doubt.? |
|
08-26-2005, 02:45 PM | #34 | ||||
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
|
Apologists assume too much about the nature of God
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
08-29-2005, 07:52 AM | #35 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 540
|
Quote:
Isa 45:1 Thus saith the LORD to his anointed, to Cyrus, whose right hand I have holden, to subdue nations before him; and I will loose the loins of kings, to open before him the two leaved gates; and the gates shall not be shut; This is exactly what happened, when the Persians came to Babylon, they diverted the river and walked directly into the city. The gates were not shut as they should have been, the king before him was partying. Then Cyrus did give the decree to rebuild Jerusalem. Another example could be Daniel’s prophetic vision, predicting the fall of Babylon, the rise of Medo-Persia, then Greece, then the Romans. This takes some symbolic interpretation though it is rather clear. Quote:
Quote:
I don’t think good works necessarily guarantee salvation. I think a Christian who is saved will automatically do good works, not to earn salvation, but because of it. In the same way, I think anyone who is truly following the light they have been shown will be kind to others and “do good works� not necessarily to “earn salvation,� but because it is a natural consequence of seeking salvation. |
|||
08-29-2005, 08:46 AM | #36 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
08-29-2005, 09:16 AM | #37 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Jersey, U.K.
Posts: 2,864
|
"Christians assume too much about the nature of God "
Christians assume too much when they assert that there is such a person. |
08-29-2005, 09:25 AM | #38 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Jersey, U.K.
Posts: 2,864
|
"Isa 44:28 That saith of Cyrus, He is my shepherd, and shall perform all my pleasure: even saying to Jerusalem, Thou shalt be built; and to the temple, Thy foundation shall be laid.
Isa 45:1 Thus saith the LORD to his anointed, to Cyrus, whose right hand I have holden, to subdue nations before him; and I will loose the loins of kings, to open before him the two leaved gates; and the gates shall not be shut; This is exactly what happened, when the Persians came to Babylon, they diverted the river and walked directly into the city. The gates were not shut as they should have been, the king before him was partying. Then Cyrus did give the decree to rebuild Jerusalem. Another example could be Daniel’s prophetic vision, predicting the fall of Babylon, the rise of Medo-Persia, then Greece, then the Romans. This takes some symbolic interpretation though it is rather clear. But if all of this was written up AFTER the events, "in order that the prophecies might be fulfilled",-then it would not be prophetic after all would it? Apparently this happened all the time. Another example was Jesus riding into Jerusalem on an ass and a colt, the foal of an ass, in order that the OT prophecy in Zechariah 9:9 would be fulfilled. I ask you which is more likely: that the so-called prophets used this literary trick of backwards revision, or that they all were clairvoyant? " |
08-29-2005, 11:58 AM | #39 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
|
Apologists assume too much about the nature of God
Message to Jemand:
I still need for you to provide evidence that Jesus helped people in tangible ways, and that God is good in tangible ways today. Logically, there is no automatic correlation that can be made between the ability to rise from the dead, the ability to predict the future, and goodness. In the NIV, John 10:37-38 say "Do not believe me unless I do what my Father does. But if I do it, even though you do not believe me, believe the miracles, that you may know and understand that the Father is in me, and I in the Father." The verses cite “tangible� evidence of Jesus’ power. More “tangible� evidence comes from Acts 14:3 and Matthew 14:14. Acts 14:3 says "So Paul and Barnabas spent considerable time there, speaking boldly for the Lord, who confirmed the message of his grace by enabling them to do miraculous signs and wonders.� Matthew 14:14 says "When Jesus landed and saw a large crowd, he had compassion on them and healed their sick." We need compassion in tangible ways today just as much as people did back then. Where is tangible evidence of God's power and compassion in tangible ways today? An unusual healing can happen to anyone, not just to Christians. In the world today, there is every indication that tangible good things and bad things are not distributed equitably, and that they are distributed according to the laws of physics, not by divine intervention. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that 1) God used to be compassionate in noticeably tangible ways but is not interested in being compassionate in noticeably tangible ways today, or that 2) he never was compassionate in noticeably tangible ways, or that 3) he does not exist. |
08-29-2005, 02:42 PM | #40 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 540
|
Have you taken the time and work to provide the "tangible" evidences of God's goodness 2,000 years ago? If so, thanks. If what you posted isn't enough, what more do you want?
As for today. Well, first off, who says God only gives "tangible" good things to his followers? Jesus didn't always ask first whether someone believed before he gave them a "tangible" benefit. In fact, that physical benefit in many cases probably preceded a reordering of the life and priorities in the recipient, and afterwards they began to believe. Not always though. So, if I said all unusual healings are evedence that God is good would you be happy? I doubt it. Is the fact that I'm alive a tangible benefit? I would say yes. The fact that I can think? I would say yes again. There's a whole lot that I see in the world and in my life that I consider as coming from a benevolant God. However, as I stated before, I think this is due in part to my assuption that God exists. If I did not think God existed, I would see the world in an entirely different light. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|