Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
03-09-2008, 04:01 PM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 3,103
|
God's Problem: How the Bible Fails to Answer Our Most Important Question--Why We Suff
Bart Ehrman's latest book is "God's Problem: How the Bible Fails to Answer Our Most Important Question--Why We Suffer by Bart D. Ehrman"
Could someone who has read it summarize in a couple of sentences Ehrman's arguments/evidence? I read the review at amazon, and he regards the Bible to give answers that contradict one another. The paragraph review gives the example that suffering is redemptive and suffering is retribution for sin. I'm not sure these answers contradict one another in all cases. best |
03-09-2008, 04:57 PM | #2 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
On Ehrman's solution
One review states: "In the end Ehrman gives up on his Christian faith and fashions a peculiarly utilitarian solution to suffering and evil in the world".
Does that mean Ehrman thinks we are responsible for our own actions? Is that legal in the states, the northern hemisphere or down under? Quote:
Pete Brown |
|
03-09-2008, 07:54 PM | #3 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
See this previous thread: Problem of Evil: Bart Ehrman's New Book [MERGED
The Publishers Weekly review seems particularly obtuse. |
03-10-2008, 12:01 AM | #4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 89
|
Is he an Epicurian now perhaps?
|
03-10-2008, 12:39 AM | #5 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 158
|
The thread Toto referenced has a very insightful interview about the book by Ehrman. Here's the link.
From what I remember he doesn't really provide an argument that the Bible doesn't answer why we suffer. Instead he provides an exposition that surveys the differing and contradicting solutions in books of the Bible, reminding people that the Bible isn't really a unity of ideas but a mixture of unique thoughts. He does although say that all the answers are insufficient to explain suffering, going on to say the problem of evil was one reason why he became an agnostic. To conclude he says he finds some solace in the book Ecclesiastes. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|