FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

View Poll Results: Are theological scholars biased?
Yes 19 52.78%
No 1 2.78%
Yes: but only those members of a particular faith like priests and Imams 4 11.11%
Yes: but usually it's atheist or agnostic theologians who have an agenda like the religions 0 0%
Theologians are no more or less biased than any other historical scholar 3 8.33%
Other: please post 4 11.11%
What? Where's the tea and buiscuits vicar..? 5 13.89%
Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-22-2008, 06:23 AM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England, Portsmouth
Posts: 5,108
Default Bias in academia?

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dagda View Post

Most decent historians try to extract context from material evidence as well as bias. So that is only true if you only have one text. Then you don't assume it is true, only that it is the only source. However theologians of the more devout kind can be guilty of bias themselves, but so can anyone.

I would like to ask though just how seriously historians take Herodotus: Histories, and how seriously they take The Bible. Because there seems to be a double standard in some interpretations, ok The Bible is many books but even so.
Some fool said this in another thread, and I got to wondering if it's fair to say, that there is bias in theological scholarship, much more than in say scholarship from classical times with no relation to the Bible and even before. Before you nut me in the face and stamp on my head, let me just say this is an honest enquiry not an inquisition, I have no reason to be biased either way, nor do I care that much what people decide.

Is it fair to say that bias is an ever present danger to honest theologians, or is it fair to even say theologians are often biased and thus dishonest, presumably more likely if you are a fundamentalist Muslim, or Catholic scholar/priest.

In that case is there a bit of a mire in historical interpretations, and do they really discuss archaeological evidence with a professional detachment. Or even is there a bias on the other side that is more pernicious than that on the side of the faithful?

Yes or no are theologians pure or have less fidelity to faith than to "truth".
The Dagda is offline  
Old 12-22-2008, 06:31 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dancing
Posts: 9,940
Default

Can a theologian remain a theologian if their scholarly conclusions contradict their beliefs?
show_no_mercy is offline  
Old 12-22-2008, 06:34 AM   #3
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England, Portsmouth
Posts: 5,108
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by show_no_mercy View Post
Can a theologian remain a theologian if their scholarly conclusions contradict their beliefs?
Of course, I suspect many theologians have had falls from faith, and may atheists have found faith in their work. However one might suggest that those working in the Vatican keep their faith or lack of it to themselves. But there are some people who are no doubt truly just agnostic and don't care about faith also.
The Dagda is offline  
Old 12-22-2008, 07:56 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: where apologists for religion are deservedly derid
Posts: 6,298
Default

Theology is a joke. Me, I'm an expert in 1980's comic books and 1990's vido games. I guess I'm scholarly too.
dettus is offline  
Old 12-22-2008, 08:11 AM   #5
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England, Portsmouth
Posts: 5,108
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dettus View Post
Theology is a joke. Me, I'm an expert in 1980's comic books and 1990's vido games. I guess I'm scholarly too.
I'm an expert on Lord of the Rings also. I tend to agree there is a certain similarity between the study of fantasy that draws wholesale from European religion and religion. So can only unbiased people like me or x discuss religion in a manner that will reveal anything but someone's own prejudices?
The Dagda is offline  
Old 12-22-2008, 08:12 AM   #6
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Who are these "atheist or agnostic theologians?"

Please note that this forum is not about theology, but Biblical criticism and history. To accuse someone who claims to be a historian or Biblical critic of doing "theology" is to implicitly accuse them of bias (or possibly just wooly thinking.)
Toto is offline  
Old 12-22-2008, 08:13 AM   #7
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England, Portsmouth
Posts: 5,108
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Who are these "atheist or agnostic theologians?"

Please note that this forum is not about theology, but Biblical criticism and history. To accuse someone who claims to be a historian or Biblical critic of doing "theology" is to implicitly accuse them of bias (or possibly just wooly thinking.)
There are plenty of agnostic theologians, studying theology doesn't mean you are a theist, but let's just call it religious studies. Academics studying religion, or whatever.
The Dagda is offline  
Old 12-22-2008, 08:43 AM   #8
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

There could theoretically be an agnostic theologian, but most academics who study religion are sociologists or historians or anthropologists, and many of those may be atheists.
Toto is offline  
Old 12-22-2008, 09:19 AM   #9
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England, Portsmouth
Posts: 5,108
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
There could theoretically be an agnostic theologian, but most academics who study religion are sociologists or historians or anthropologists, and many of those may be atheists.
Funny you should say that I happen to know an agnostic theologian who is a post doctorate. If your hung up on the term theologian, just consider it a scholar of religion.
The Dagda is offline  
Old 12-22-2008, 09:26 AM   #10
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 202
Default

Quote:
I would like to ask though just how seriously historians take Herodotus: Histories, and how seriously they take The Bible
A better example might be to compare Homer and the bible. Both were treated with reverence in their day. Supplied their respective cultures with their metaphors and cliches, lessons for life. Today only one is "alive" - has laymen pouring over it for pointers. This backdrop adds a lot of heat to study: whether from those who want to strip the bible of its aura or from those who want to preserve it, whether amateur or "professional". Few approach that book as "just a text". Take this forum: you see many fora out there for "Homer criticism"?
gentleexit is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:31 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.