FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-11-2006, 02:17 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
Default Help with timeline of Christianity

I'm trying to put together a timeline of events relevent to the devleopment of Christianity. Here is what I have so far. Any help is appreciated:

165 BCE - Maccabee defeats Greek Army
140 BCE - Hasmonean Kingdom established
44 BCE - Death of Julius Ceasar
37 BCE - Herod declared King of the Jews by Roman authority, ending Hasmonean rule
20 BCE - 40 CE Jewish theologean Philo integrates Greek philosophy and Jewish theology
4 BCE - 33 CE - Supposed lifetime of Jesus
37 CE - Death of Pontious Pilate
39 CE - Death of John the Baptist according to Josephus
50-70 CE - Letters of Paul written
63 CE - Jewish revolt against Roman authority in Judea
67-70 - Judea destroyed by Roman army
69-75 CE - Gospel of Mark written
80-100 CE - Gospels of Matthew and Luke written
94 CE - Josephus writes Jewish Antiquities
109 - Tacitus write Annals, possibly refers to Christians being persecuted in 64 CE
112 - Pliny the Younger write letter to Trajan about Christians
120-140 CE - Gospel of John written
132-135 CE - Bar Kokhba's Revolt
313 - Edict of Milan - Constantine allow freedom of all religions
380? - Theodosius declares Cathololocism official state religon of Rome
394 - Battle of the Frigidus, Theodosius defeats remaining pagan armies in the Empire, all of Rome now offically Christian
Malachi151 is offline  
Old 10-11-2006, 02:33 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 740
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malachi151 View Post
50-70 CE - Letters of Paul written
I'd tighten that to 48-64.

Quote:
69-75 CE - Gospel of Mark written
I'd expand that to 66-80.

Quote:
80-100 CE - Gospels of Matthew and Luke written
I'd expand Matthew to 70-110 and Luke to 70-140.

Quote:
120-140 CE - Gospel of John written
This is the only thing I could find that is definitely wrong. John was written c.90-120.
hatsoff is offline  
Old 10-11-2006, 06:39 PM   #3
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

4 BCE - 93 CE - Supposed lifetime of the author Apollonius of Tyana

100 - 250CE - The Second Sophistic

325 CE - Council of Nicaea, summoned by Constantine (supreme 324)
325 CE - Exclusionism of Arius' "there was a time when he was not"

c. 327-330 - First citation of the physical binding of the New & Old Literature (so-called "Constantine Bibles")

362 CE - Julian's invectives "The NT is a fiction of men composed by wickedness"
mountainman is offline  
Old 10-12-2006, 07:30 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
Default

I have a problem with the Dataing of John, however there are problems with my problem.

My problem is this. According to the Talmud and to Jewish tradition, the first time the term Messiah was used was in relation to Bar Kokhba in the 130s.

The only time that the word Messiah (in english translations) is present in the Bible is in the Gospel of John.

Now, it would make sense to me, for a variety of reasons, including this, that the Gospel of John was written after Bar Kokhba had been designated Messiah.

This would explain why John is so anti-Jewish, deepens the split between Jews and Christians and why John calls Jesus Messiah.

Now, either the parts of John that call Jesus Messiah were added later, or this whole business or Messiah isn't as well defined as I think it is, or something has been lost in translation, or John was written in the 130s, after Bar Kokhba had been named Messiah.

Thoughts?
Malachi151 is offline  
Old 10-12-2006, 08:52 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: boston
Posts: 3,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malachi151 View Post
I have a problem with the Dataing of John, however there are problems with my problem.

My problem is this. According to the Talmud and to Jewish tradition, the first time the term Messiah was used was in relation to Bar Kokhba in the 130s.

The only time that the word Messiah (in english translations) is present in the Bible is in the Gospel of John.

Now, it would make sense to me, for a variety of reasons, including this, that the Gospel of John was written after Bar Kokhba had been designated Messiah.

This would explain why John is so anti-Jewish, deepens the split between Jews and Christians and why John calls Jesus Messiah.

Now, either the parts of John that call Jesus Messiah were added later, or this whole business or Messiah isn't as well defined as I think it is, or something has been lost in translation, or John was written in the 130s, after Bar Kokhba had been named Messiah.

Thoughts?
The Hebrew word xyXm (the anointed one) is used 38 times in OT. The transliteration of that word is Mashiyach with a phonetic spelling of maw-shee'-akh. The Greek equivalent of that word as John tells us is cristoß, a word used 500 times in NT.
angela2 is offline  
Old 10-12-2006, 09:28 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
Default

Interesting, but doesn't cristoß = Christ?

Are Christ and Messiah eqivilent?
Malachi151 is offline  
Old 10-12-2006, 10:06 AM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: boston
Posts: 3,687
Default

That's what John says. I see not reason to suppose that the other gospel writers believed otherwise.

Certainly John is using a Hebrew word in a way that it was not originally used. But I don't see that as a problem for the credibility of John's gospel or for that matter the synoptics.
angela2 is offline  
Old 10-12-2006, 10:20 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
Default

No, my issue is that Bar Kokhba was supposedly the first (only) person to be declared "The Messiah" according to the Talmud in the 130s.

I'm trying to figure if John was written in opposition to this declaration of Bar Kokhba as the Messiah, by delcaring Jesus the Messiah, since this would make sense in many ways, and, at least in the English translations, only John uses the word "Messiah".
Malachi151 is offline  
Old 10-12-2006, 11:21 AM   #9
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

What is your source for the idea that Bar Kokhba was the only person to be declared the Messiah? The term was certainly in use before 130 CE.
Toto is offline  
Old 10-12-2006, 04:42 PM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
What is your source for the idea that Bar Kokhba was the only person to be declared the Messiah? The term was certainly in use before 130 CE.
I hate to say it, but I got that from wikipedia. However, I did a search on Biblegateway to see if this had any backing and a seach of the whole Bible for Messiah only had two results, both in John, hence I wondered if John was written after this time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_bar_Kokhba

Quote:
Originally named Simon Bar Kosiba, he was given the name Bar Kokhba (Aramaic for "Son of a Star", referring to Numbers 24:17, "A star has shot off Jacob") by his contemporary, the Jewish sage Rabbi Akiva, who first introduced the concept of the Jewish Messiah, considering it to be Bar Kokhba. This was the first introduction of the concept of a Messiah in Judaism[1]. After the failure of the revolt, many, including rabbinical writers, called him Simon bar Kozeba ("Son of the lie").

1: ^ The Talmud records Hillel the Elder saying there will be no future messiah for the Jewish nation. The first person recorded with such a doctrine is Rabbi Akiva
Malachi151 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:27 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.