FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Non Abrahamic Religions & Philosophies
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-17-2004, 09:29 AM   #31
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Posts: 4,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Salieri
Another way to put it is that without Christ, we can never get rid of our envy, greed, gluttony, sloth wrath, lust, and pride. We will be trapped in them forever with no way out. We will also die never having them be redeemed. The above sins is what causes the world's problems! Christi is the ONLY solution to the sin problem....[mindless blather deleted]
Actually, some of the above sins can be rid of with medication and/or surgery. For example, gluttony can often be managed with appetitte suppressants or stomach stapling. Sloth, sometimes is due to depression or a neurotransmitter problem, which can be remedied also with a variety of anti-depressants. Wrath is often just an anger management problem, which can be suppressed with medication (or a lobotomy). Lust can be eliminated or controlled with chemical castration or surgery, but without lust, God's children wouldn't care to reproduce, so I'm not sure why its such a bad thing.
So you see, you are wrong. There are alternate ways to treat sins, and Christi is NOT the only solution.

Keep in mind that, according to your worldview, God created us and is responsible for our design, so really it is his fault that we are the way we are. If you design the hardware and software for a computer and it behaves badly, who's fault is that? Is it the computer's fault? No, its just doing what it was made to do. The designer (you) is the true problem, because you made a mistake in the design. And no, you can't fix the computer's problems by dragging it through town while people whip it, and then nailing it to a stick in the town square.
thebeave is offline  
Old 11-17-2004, 09:46 AM   #32
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 3,095
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thebeave
And no, you can't fix the computer's problems by dragging it through town while people whip it, and then nailing it to a stick in the town square.
In the case of Christianity, in order to fix the computer you'd drag the toaster through the town while people whip it, then nail it to a stick in the town square.
Selsaral is offline  
Old 11-17-2004, 10:48 AM   #33
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dallas-Plano-Irving MSA, Texas
Posts: 3,376
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbc
See, what I've never understood is what it even MEANS to 'die for' someone's sins.

"For my sister so loved me, that she hit herself on the head with a brick for my parking tickets" -> "That's nice, now pay the fine." -> "but... the brick!" -> "I don't give a damn if she danced the lindy hop with a herd of diseased elk. You didn't feed the meter. Now pay."

Exactly how does one person's suffering amerliorate another person's wrongdoing? I don't even see how suffering ameliorates your OWN wrongdoing, let alone anyone else's.

The two concepts just aren't related. If I kick an old lady in the shins, then throwing myself down the stairs in repentance won't make it unhappen. And unless she's a particularly spiteful old lady, my pain won't even make her feel any better about it.

It's doubly irrelevant if someone ELSE throws themselves down the stairs on my behalf.

God could slaughter dozens of himselves, and it wouldn't make the bad things people do any less bad. If he just wanted an excuse or mechanism to forgive people - why killing his son? Why require that people accept that he killed his son? Why not require that they paint their nose green, or set fire to their toenails, or something? It's about as relevant, and a lot less horrible.

Why the hell does god need a mechanism in the first place? I mean, he's meant to be omnipotent, so mechanisms should be entirely unnecessary no matter WHAT he wants. And hell... I can forgive in the blink of an eye, if I choose. Why can't god do something a mere mortal has no problem with?

Christianity is weird.

jbc
The best answer I can come up with is that the ancient Hebrews (and many of their contemporaries) were obsessed with animal and human sacrifice. All of the sacrifice that had been done for thousands of years had not changed the nature of "god," so it was time to make another bold claim to justify the authority of god and his minions.

Those who founded Christianity perhaps thought that God in Flesh sacrificing himself would somehow be the noblest sacrifice. I think it's one other example of a theology that really wasn't thought out that well when it was introduced. I'm sure the creators didn't really think we'd be sitting here 2,000 years later debating it. Only two millenia of theologians piling apologetic shit on top of it could be enough to confuse people into overlooking its absurdity.

JohNeo
JohNeo is offline  
Old 11-17-2004, 03:08 PM   #34
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 2
Default

Quote:
I've never understood why God needs something to die for my sins. I don't really get why God requires sins to be punished at all. Couldn't he just fix me without killing anything? He is God, after all. Why is God such a sadist?
A few questions for everyone along these lines. For the sake of discussion, suppose that God exists as Christians put forth, i.e. loving, just, righteous, sinless, all-powerful, etc.

1. What do you think sin is?

2. Why would you suppose sin is a problem to Him?

3. If he is all those things we agreed on, how do you suppose he would go about dealing with sin?

4. Since you've sinned, as I'm sure you agree (or at least those who know you best will agree), how would you suppose to get to Heaven, to God, who is sinless?
Mullet Over is offline  
Old 11-18-2004, 01:06 AM   #35
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 12
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mullet Over
A few questions for everyone along these lines. For the sake of discussion, suppose that God exists as Christians put forth, i.e. loving, just, righteous, sinless, all-powerful, etc.

1. What do you think sin is?

2. Why would you suppose sin is a problem to Him?

3. If he is all those things we agreed on, how do you suppose he would go about dealing with sin?

4. Since you've sinned, as I'm sure you agree (or at least those who know you best will agree), how would you suppose to get to Heaven, to God, who is sinless?

1 Sin is denial of reality. God The Father is the only true reality, a spirit whose attributes are love, mercy, goodness, joy etc.(sin is NOT a spiritual reality, it is an illusion. Illusions are not real )

2. Sin is not a problem to him but to you !! Since committing a sin is actually denying the reality of creation, by choosing to sin it shows that you are actually INSANE because you think that an illusion is real. Insanity can not enter into Heaven !!

3.He sends his Sons to show you the true reality. Note the way Jesus lived and died. He even said of his enemies: "Forgive them Father for they know not what they do".

4.In the time-space creations, as opposed to pure spirit creations, the method of attaining Heaven and God is through EVOLUTION and EXPERIENCE. In this PROGRESSIVE EVOLUTION, it is your MIND which needs to be spiritualised (become Christlike) so that you are able to clearly see what the true nature of reality is. Please note that a highly INTELLECTUAL MIND doesn't necessarily mean that this same mind is spiritualised. Examples are: Ted Bundy, Charles Manson etc. Contrast them with Mother Theresa, Dalai Lama etc and you can clearly see the difference.


Cheers
Christ Michael is offline  
Old 11-18-2004, 09:28 AM   #36
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 2,817
Default

Quote:
1 Sin is denial of reality. God The Father is the only true reality, a spirit whose attributes are love, mercy, goodness, joy etc.(sin is NOT a spiritual reality, it is an illusion. Illusions are not real )
Let's see...in your version of reality, you have a talking snake, a voice coming from a burning bush, an an entire sky filled with choirs of angels. It sounds as though you live in a Disney musical. In my version of reality, the universe moves in accordance to physics, mathematics, and other provable things. And I'M denying reality?

Quote:
2. Sin is not a problem to him but to you !! Since committing a sin is actually denying the reality of creation, by choosing to sin it shows that you are actually INSANE because you think that an illusion is real. Insanity can not enter into Heaven !!
Actually, the Bible makes it clear that sin is a problem for him...that he hates it and cannot bear it. Sounds to me like his "perfection" is awfully fragile...thus by definition not perfect. Also, how does closing my eyes to physical evidence and logic insane? To me it is insane that anyone can believe a book filled with contadictions and hypocrisy couyld possibly be a guide to life and the hereafter.

Quote:
3.He sends his Sons to show you the true reality. Note the way Jesus lived and died. He even said of his enemies: "Forgive them Father for they know not what they do".
This has been gone over and over again. This whole thing is completely nonsensical. Why does he have to sacrifice a part of himself to save us from himself? Remember...God supposedly is the one who set up the whole thing in the first place. Instead of going through such an utterly pointless performance, why not simply fix the problem? If he's God, I'm sure he could do that if he really wanted to. Or is he unable to somehow? If he is unable, then how can he be omnipotent?

Quote:
4.In the time-space creations, as opposed to pure spirit creations, the method of attaining Heaven and God is through EVOLUTION and EXPERIENCE. In this PROGRESSIVE EVOLUTION, it is your MIND which needs to be spiritualised (become Christlike) so that you are able to clearly see what the true nature of reality is. Please note that a highly INTELLECTUAL MIND doesn't necessarily mean that this same mind is spiritualised. Examples are: Ted Bundy, Charles Manson etc. Contrast them with Mother Theresa, Dalai Lama etc and you can clearly see the difference.
EXTREMELY poor examples of the intellectual mind. To equate "intellectualism" with the like of serial killers and mass murderers is not only far from accurate, it also exposes your prejeduce for all to see. Neither Bundy nor Manson were "intellectual" by any stretch of the imagination. Not only are you "stscking" your example, you are pointing at sociopathic monsters and claiming they are somehow examples of intelligence. If I were to use such tactics, I would compare Stephen Hawking and Thomas Jefferson to David Koresh and Pat Robertson.

Whenever I hear a christian talk about this (favoring "Christlike" minds over intellectually development) I cannot help but wonder how America became such a world power with people like this actively encouraging people to be stupid. "Throw away your analytical mind! Embrace ignorance and call it spirituality!" It's like saying that by getting a labotomy I'll become holy.
Avatar is offline  
Old 11-18-2004, 10:02 AM   #37
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ Michael
1 Sin is denial of reality. God The Father is the only true reality, a spirit whose attributes are love, mercy, goodness, joy etc.(sin is NOT a spiritual reality, it is an illusion. Illusions are not real )

2. Sin is not a problem to him but to you !! Since committing a sin is actually denying the reality of creation, by choosing to sin it shows that you are actually INSANE because you think that an illusion is real. Insanity can not enter into Heaven !!

3.He sends his Sons to show you the true reality. Note the way Jesus lived and died. He even said of his enemies: "Forgive them Father for they know not what they do".

4.In the time-space creations, as opposed to pure spirit creations, the method of attaining Heaven and God is through EVOLUTION and EXPERIENCE. In this PROGRESSIVE EVOLUTION, it is your MIND which needs to be spiritualised (become Christlike) so that you are able to clearly see what the true nature of reality is. Please note that a highly INTELLECTUAL MIND doesn't necessarily mean that this same mind is spiritualised. Examples are: Ted Bundy, Charles Manson etc. Contrast them with Mother Theresa, Dalai Lama etc and you can clearly see the difference.


Cheers
Christ Michael, what you've said is silly, and has absolutely no biblical basis.


Does anyone else have answers to the questions I posed? Those who think the idea of substitutionary death is so ridiculous?
Mullet Over is offline  
Old 11-18-2004, 08:12 PM   #38
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 12
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mullet Over
Christ Michael, what you've said is silly, and has absolutely no biblical basis.


Does anyone else have answers to the questions I posed? Those who think the idea of substitutionary death is so ridiculous?

What is silly is your assertion that I used the Bible, when I didn't mention it even once !! Since when does the Bible believe in evolution ??


The four point answer I gave to your questions is the true nature of reality wheather you like it or not !! Those point will stand up and defeat any and all challenges !!!!!!!


Cheers

P.S. Christ NEVER died for anybody's sins. That is just silly christian theology.
Christ Michael is offline  
Old 11-19-2004, 03:15 AM   #39
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 4,540
Default

posted by Mullet Over
Quote:
A few questions for everyone along these lines. For the sake of discussion, suppose that God exists as Christians put forth, i.e. loving, just, righteous, sinless, all-powerful, etc.
1. What do you think sin is?
2. Why would you suppose sin is a problem to Him?
3. If he is all those things we agreed on, how do you suppose he would go about dealing with sin?
4. Since you've sinned, as I'm sure you agree (or at least those who know you best will agree), how would you suppose to get to Heaven, to God, who is sinless?
For the sake of discussion I'll give it a try:

1. Sin would be going against god's will. Since god is onmipotent and omniscient it is impossible to go against god's will unless he allows it (which makes it his will that you go against his will). Therefore sin does not exist.

2. Sin would be a problem because only god has the power to make the impossible happen. If sin occurs it means either god is not omnipotent and omniscient or that god is not god.

3. If god were loving, just, righteous, all-powerful, etc. and somehow the impossible happened against his will, he would figure out why it happened and either make sure it never happened again, or he would tolerate it happening, or he would admit he was not god . The loving and just part of his nature would preclude inflicting any torment, eternal or otherwise, on anyone, only-begotten son or otherwise.

4. Hmmm.... This is a puzzler. Since sin is god's will (if he really is god) every sinner does the will of god. Since every sinner is doing god's will, and god is loving and just, every sinner should go to heaven. For god to punish sinners for doing his will would be unjust, unrighteous, wicked, and cruel.
However, god is all-powerful. He is not constrained by his own nature (if he is then he isn't god, who is omnipotent and can do whatever he pleases). Therefore, god could send every one to eternal torment and suffering regardless of whether they did his will or not.
I don't know :huh:
Is there such a thing as heaven?
Arctish is offline  
Old 11-19-2004, 03:44 AM   #40
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: manchester, England
Posts: 916
Default ()() ( (

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mullet Over
A few questions for everyone along these lines. For the sake of discussion, suppose that God exists as Christians put forth, i.e. loving, just, righteous, sinless, all-powerful, etc.

1. What do you think sin is?

It means literally "to miss the mark"....i am assuiming this means
actually to 'sow one's seed on the floor', ie., non-procreational sex.
Also, we have the same sexual meaning as we go from strict Judaism to christianity, where 'unbridled' suxuality is 'the sins of the flesh'....
St Augustine who elaborated the idea of 'original sin' claimed that the 'involuntary' sexual lust was THe original sin, and that we are all of us born into original sin from the consequnece of the lust of our mammas a pappas
so, in other words i am seeing th patriarcahl meaning of 'sin' to be all connected with ecstatic sexuality, which is not just for procreational means, Whihc would also include 'disobeying' the 'Lord God'.

2. Why would you suppose sin is a problem to Him?

'Him' = patriarcahy, which means 'rule of the fathers'--ie., male authority. Therefore if one was quite fulfilled sexually and ecstatically--ie., that eroticism is also more than just genital activity, though the latter will be included of course, then all your alleginace wont be for 'Him' and 'he' is a 'jealous god'!

3. If he is all those things we agreed on, how do you suppose he would go about dealing with sin?

Well 'he'= male authority who tell people what to do, right? for authoritarian reasons of power and son. We have seen vvery well in our histroy what these men are capable of if they seek to crush 'heretics' etc, haven't we?

4. Since you've sinned, as I'm sure you agree (or at least those who know you best will agree), how would you suppose to get to Heaven, to God, who is sinless?
Hop by now you've seen through the game, then you dont even need to play theirs. all this 'heaven' and 'hell' nonesense is a cntrolling strategy to keep you un-balanced and clinging to their authority.
did you know that SF Native Americans told the missionaries where to get off, because they didn't believe in sin?.....hehe
lulay is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:23 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.