aa5874

In the Short-Ending gMark, considered the earliest gMark of the Canon, Sinaiticus gMark, there is this passage.

Mark 4 In gMark, Jesus DELIBERATELY spoke in parables so that the Jews, the Outsiders, would Remain in Sin and Not be Forgiven.

Those passages are EXTREMELY significant.

1. Jesus in gMark did NOT want the Jews to understand him.

2. Jesus in gMark wanted the Jews to REMAIN in Sin.

3. Jesus in gMark did NOT want the Jews to be Forgiven.

But, why does Jesus in gMark make claims that do NOT depict him as a SAVIOUR for the Jews?

gMark's Jesus was NOT a Savior--gMark's Jesus was INVENTED to fulfill so-called Prophecies in Hebrew Scripture.

The words of Jesus in gMark 4.12 was LIFTED from the Prophet Isaiah in the 6th chapter.

Isaiah 6. 1. The Jesus of gMark has DONE as stated by the Prophet in Isaiah 6.

2. The Jesus of gMark SPOKE in Parables and told his disciples that he did NOT want the Jews to be forgiven in Mark 4.

But HOW LONG MUST the Jews, the outsiders, be KEPT in an UNFORGIVEN state? HOW LONG Must the Jews, the outsiders, be IGNORANT of the parables of Jesus?

The very SAME Prophet Isaiah in the very same chapter will SAY how the Jews must REMAIN in Ignorance and WITHOUT Forgiveness.


Isaiah 6 Sinaiticus gMark FULFILLS the so-called Prophecy in Isaiah 6 by ENDING at Mark 16.8.

In gMark up to the VERY LAST verse the Jews, the outsiders, were IGNORANT of Jesus as a SAVIOR and Messiah.

In gMark, The Jews, the outsiders, have NO idea that Jesus DIED for their Sins up to the time Sinaiticus gMark was written.

The author of gMark COULD NOT have made his Jesus story known UNTIL "the cities be wasted without inhabitant, and the houses without man, and the land be utterly desolate".

The author of gMark could NOT have made his Jesus story known UNTIL the Fall of the Temple and the destruction of Jerusalem c 70 CE.


If the Jews KNEW that Jesus was the SAVIOR and Messiah Before the Fall of the Temple and the destruction of Jerusalem then the very statement of Jesus in Mark 4.12 would BE IRRELEVANT or simply absurd.

In effect, Sinaiticus gMark Jesus story will ONLY appear Credible if the Jews, the outsiders, did NOT know Jesus was a SAVIOR and Messiah UNTIL the author wrote his story.

Sinaiticus gMark is fundamentally COMPATIBLE with the so-called prophecy in Isaiah 6.

The Pauline writings have done the COMPLETE OPPOSITE.

The Pauline writings are NOT compatible with Isaiah 6 at all.

The Pauline writings are NOT compatible with Sinaiticus gMark.

The Jews, the Outsiders, were NOT supposed to know Jesus was a SAVIOR and Messiah UNTIL the Jewish Temple had Fallen and Jerusalem destroyed.

The Pauline writer, supposedly a Jew and a Pharisee, went ALL over the Roman Empire in Jerusalem and MAJOR Cities telling People that Jesus was a SAVIOR and Messiah CONTRARY to the words of the Prophet in Isaiah 6.

The Pauline writings make Isaiah a FALSE prophet

gMark and the Pauline writings are INCOMPATIBLE.

gMark FULFILLS the prophecy in Isaiah 6.

There could have been NO Pauline writings BEFORE Sinaiticus gMark based on Isaiah 6.

There could have been No writings that made it known to the Jews that Jesus was a Savior and Messiah BEFORE the FALL of the Temple and the destruction of Jerusalem.

To FULFILL Prophecy the author Sinaiticus gMark MUST write his story AFTER "the cities be wasted without inhabitant, and the houses without man, and the land be utterly desolate" or After the Fall of the Temple.

gMark has DESTROYED Paul.

The Pauline writings are products of chronological Fiction.

Chili

Nicely put together but in defense of Paul let me remind you, or maybe just inform you that the New Religion of Paul was New Testament based to be severed clear-cut from the OT because you cannot have 2 different Lord Gods before you, as in one of the OT and another of the NT. The NT designation only means that we share the same God as a grafted branch on the OT Genesis trunk where we come full circle alos but bypass the whole Jewish line of descend and go right back to [Father] God of Genesis 1 (Luke 3:23-), with now JC being both God and Lord God in John 20:28 and so a new relgion is formed in the design of the 2 and full circle for both in the number 8.

And of course the parable bit is needed because the NT was never meant to destroy the OT but to journey along side by side with them towards the same destiny and therefore is there room for them in our heaven where we speak the same language and are delighted by the mansions they built, --except maybe that we use a different toilet to define clean on our own.

Mark was cleansed of Jewish perversion only to show in Luke where and why they went wrong and this only to promulgate the same God that we share, but if thru the Son we reach the father it is wrong to serve 2 masters and so you cannot be both OT and NT people and wrong also is he who thinks that brown-nosing a Jew into heaven will get him somewhere . . . for Peter is Peter and he still is the same.

aa5874

When the NT Canon is examined carefully there is a startling and disturbing REVELATION.

Only Acts of the Apostles is fundamentally compatible with the Pauline writings so much so that the Pauline writer ADMITTED he was in a basket by a wall in Damascus in 2 Cor. 12 just like it is stated in Acts of the Apostles 9.25.

But, Acts of the Apostles is regarded as a very late writing and AFTER gMark.

None of the Gospels identified a character called Paul and none of the Gospel writers used the Pauline post-resurrection story that OVER 500 people AT ONCE WITNESSED the resurrected Jesus.

But, the author of gMatthew will show that he too was UNAWARE of Paul and was UNAWARE that Paul was the one who was commissioned and PREACHED the Gospel to the Gentiles of all nations.

If the author of gMatthew was AWARE of Galatians then he would have KNOWN that Jesus Christ, through revelation, COMMISSIONED Paul to preach to the Gentiles.

This is the Great Commission in gMatthew 28. The author gMatthew was UNAWARE of Epistle to the Galatians and did NOT attend a Pauline Church or had NOT heard Paul preach.

This is Galatians 1Galatians 2 This is 1 Cor. 1-17. Paul claimed he was Commissioned to the Gentiles, NOT Peter, and that he Paul was NOT sent to Baptize.

The Great Commission in gMatthew is NOT compatible with the Pauline writings.

The author of gMatthew did NOT appear to know that Jesus REVEALED to Paul that it was HE Paul and NOT Peter who should Preach to the heathen.

The Great Commission in gMatthew is Compatible with the Commission in the INTERPOLATED gMark.

This is the Commission in the Interpolated gMark 16. Not even the INTERPOLATOR made gMark compatible with the Pauline writings.

The Interpolator of gMark claimed it was the disciples that was Commissioned to preach the gospel to EVERY CREATURE of all the world, NOT PAUL at all.

The Interpolator does NOT appear to have been to a Pauline Church, was NOT a Convert of Paul, did NOT hear Paul preach to the Gentiles and did NOT know Paul preached the Gospel in Major Cities ALL over the world when Peter was in Jerusalem.

gMark destroys PAUL.

Paul is a FICTION character UNKNOWN to the Gospel writers and their Interpolators.

Chili

Of course Paul was different as two different Gospels were preached and those who heard Matthew and Mark cannot hear Paul even if they hear him speak because a pupil cannot be greater than his master or you would know the difference too, with the difference being that Paul did not preach with 'wordy wisdom lest the cross be rendered void' (conveniently missed by you in 1Cor.1:17) and so Paul could not baptize as his words were not milk but feed for the sheep that do hear his voice and where so now ''love means agape' in the end (Jn.27:17).

What Paul is really saying is that the Gospels are not for the common man to read lest they do 'go to the ends of the world' and preach to the sinner and saved with the same words.' And Paul's reason for this is that the Gospels take place in purgatory proper (there Galilee) which takes us from rebirth to heaven except for Matthew and Mark who give us a circular ride without end and we still die nontheless, and here now please read Galatians 5:1-4 where saved sinners are set free from the yoke and slavery of sin to never cross the treshold of a temple again lest they lose favor with God in verse 4.

Instead of your bible readings a good image for you here would be that religion is like a wheel barrow that we push, yes, uphill even and loaded for sure so we get tired of it sooner and look for a place to rest in a clearing where we abandon religion wheel barrow and all and just slide back downhill whence we came. This will be called Eden according to Paul instead of a 'higher horse' again that makes us worse than the one crucified (Matt.27:64) and go preach the gospel to every Tom, Dick, Harry and his dog, for who we are sure there will be a place in heaven as well (but also has to die first so he cannot tell).