hatsoff

I was reading the so-called critical text of Q today, and I am very thankful that someone has taken the time to pick out and translate the double-tradition material common between Matt and Luke--i.e. the hypothetical extant text of the Q document. But it has made me curious about the uniquely Matthean and uniquely Lukan material. Has someone bothered to delete all the Markan and Q material from these Gospels, so that we can see their bared contributions to the story?

That is to say, is there any online text of the material unique to Matthew, which is not in Mark or Luke/Q? And is there an online text of the material unique to Luke, which is not in Mark or Matthew/Q?

Thanks!

DCHindley

These synopsis are available at a number of sites. Just do a Google search on "Synoptic" and "Gospels" and "Parallel" or "Comparison."

A lot of them leave something to be desired (e.g., don't actually compare the texts in English much less in the original Greek) and some only compare them in Greek (most of us don't read it fluently), but the following one seems to compare then side by side in English (no endorsement to the site's POV is made by me):

http://www.awitness.org/synoptic/mark/mark2.htm

DCH

mountainman

Have you had a look at the Eusebian Canon Tables
available to all Chrestos Christians as Ready Reckoners
for the newly published Constantine Bibles? Who needs Q
when you have the Eusebian canon tables?