FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-13-2005, 12:52 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brighton, England
Posts: 6,947
Default Accurate Judges 1:19 translation...

Most people here are probably familiar with Judges 1:19

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jdg 1:19
And the LORD was with Judah; and he drave out [the inhabitants of] the mountain; but could not drive out the inhabitants of the valley, because they had chariots of iron.
There is currently a thread going on in GRD discussing this passage, and a disagreement has started about the proper interpretation of the verse.

More specifically, we have Christians saying that when the verse says that "he" could not drive out the people with chariots of iron, the "he" is obviously referring to Judah. We also have atheists saying that the "he" is obviously referring to Yahweh.

Does the Hebrew grammar make it clear one way or the other which of these is the intention of the writer?

Edited to add: And while we are at it, does the wording of the "Yahweh was with Judah" bit imply that Yahweh was physically walking around with him (as he is wont to do in the OT) or is it just a standard bit of Hebrew phraseology that we would think of as the equivalent of "Judah had "God" (or "fate" or "luck") on his side..."
Dean Anderson is offline  
Old 10-13-2005, 01:10 AM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Perhaps Gen 39:2 is illustrative in that it begins in exactly the same manner as Jgs 1:19, so I'd say that the christians are right. However, the lord's favour didn't help them against the chariots of iron.


spin
spin is offline  
Old 10-13-2005, 03:20 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 1,708
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pervy
We also have atheists saying that the "he" is obviously referring to Yahweh.
I have to believe that most atheists are saying that it doesn't matter. Either god himself or his (previously-sufficient) assistance is now no match for iron chariots. Seems to me that's the way any honest interpretation must go regarless of belief.
Javaman is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:42 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.