Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
01-13-2005, 09:42 AM | #51 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
01-13-2005, 02:54 PM | #52 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
|
Quote:
Vorkosigan |
|
01-13-2005, 03:04 PM | #53 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
|
Quote:
Why have a historic crucifixion and a supernatural resurrection if that violates the laws of nature? Why not have both as metaphysical events if that would be a natural consequence of the fall wherein our second nature was only conjectured in and by our tree of knowledge (left brain)? I object to the synoptic viewpoint that is held by most people. In this argument I allow the OT to be the OT and propose that before the NT can call itself a New testament it must take the physics of the OT and remove Judaism from it. This purification is achieved between Matthew and Mark. Let me emphasize there that Jesus my have been a reformer but he sure was not a protestant. This leaves Mark empty, undressed and cold but densified and explosive because salvation is real. From there the new insights are added in Luke to arrive at a good working Gospel in John that is meant for Catholics only . . . who can therefore co-exist with Jews in Christendom without allegiance or animosity. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|