FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-09-2003, 08:30 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 532
Default Isaiah's prediction of Cyrus

So Isaiah managed to predict Cyrus by name. How much of a feat was that?

I literally know very little about this, so I'd like some of the skeptics opinions on it.

Thanks.
Phil Scott is offline  
Old 11-09-2003, 08:49 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 5,864
Default

From what I recall of my errant years of Bible study, Cyrus is “predicted” in what scholars call Second Isaiah, which was added to the text long after the original was written, and after Cyrus had come to power. So it appears to be another miraculous after-the-fact prediction, just like almost all Bible prophecy.

(I’m sure this thread is going to be miraculously transported to BC&H, just as the Bible predicted.)
Howard is offline  
Old 11-09-2003, 08:51 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 532
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Howard
From what I recall of my errant years of Bible study, Cyrus is “predicted” in what scholars call Second Isaiah, which was added to the next long after the original and was written after Cyrus had come to power. So it appears to be another miraculous after-the-fact prediction, just like almost all Bible prophecy.

(I’m sure this thread is going to be miraculously transported to BC&H, just as the Bible predicted.)
Oh yes, I've just noticed that forum and I should have posted there.
Phil Scott is offline  
Old 11-09-2003, 08:56 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Howard
From what I recall of my errant years of Bible study, Cyrus is “predicted” in what scholars call Second Isaiah, which was added to the text long after the original was written, and after Cyrus had come to power. So it appears to be another miraculous after-the-fact prediction, just like almost all Bible prophecy.

(I’m sure this thread is going to be miraculously transported to BC&H, just as the Bible predicted.)
Got any evidence that the prophecy in Isaiah was added after the fact, or is this just another stupid atheist attempt to reject God and the Bible?
Magus55 is offline  
Old 11-09-2003, 09:13 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 5,864
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
Got any evidence that the prophecy in Isaiah was added after the fact, or is this just another stupid atheist attempt to reject God and the Bible?
The usual methods that scholars use: exegesis, writing style, historical context, subject matter, the fact that it was written during the Babylonian exile, long after first Isaiah.

(Since when did name calling become an apologetic tactic? Very un-Christian of you, Magus.)
Howard is offline  
Old 11-09-2003, 09:23 AM   #6
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sverige
Posts: 201
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
Got any evidence that the prophecy in Isaiah was added after the fact, or is this just another stupid atheist attempt to reject God and the Bible?

What and believing in a non-proven deity is not stupid???

er right.
number3 is offline  
Old 11-09-2003, 09:38 AM   #7
HRG
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 2,406
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
Got any evidence that the prophecy in Isaiah was added after the fact, or is this just another stupid atheist attempt to reject God and the Bible?
Got any evidence that it wasn't ?

Regards,
HRG.
HRG is offline  
Old 11-09-2003, 10:37 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 713
Default

A number of psychics claimed to have predicted the 9-11 disaster. None of them can offer any proof that they predicted this in advance. However, we can't prove that they didn't predict it in advance so I guess by the Magus standard we should just take their word for it. Their powers are for real! Call James Randi at once.
Dargo is offline  
Old 11-09-2003, 10:40 AM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,762
Default

Magus: It logically could have been, therefore it's up to you to DISprove it.

See, I can play the presuppositionalist word-games, too.
Calzaer is offline  
Old 11-09-2003, 10:41 AM   #10
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sverige
Posts: 201
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Dargo
A number of psychics claimed to have predicted the 9-11 disaster. None of them can offer any proof that they predicted this in advance. However, we can't prove that they didn't predict it in advance so I guess by the Magus standard we should just take their word for it. Their powers are for real! Call James Randi at once.

I am psychic. How do I know?

I t says 'medium' in my pants.
number3 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:15 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.