Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
02-09-2008, 08:42 AM | #1 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
|
William Lane Craig makes a blunder
Consider the following:
http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billc...ocs/tomb2.html Quote:
If Jesus did not rise from the dead, obviously, no one would have claimed that the body of Jesus had been stolen. What non-Christian historical evidence is that there was a "widespread Jewish allegation that the disciples had stolen Jesus' body"? |
|
02-09-2008, 12:24 PM | #2 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
|
Quote:
http://www.answering-islam.org/Silas/demons.htm Christian polemic, of course, presupposes that Muhammad really did have a supernatural visitation. They just ascribe it to demons. So we have powerful proof from even the enemies of Islam that there really was a spiritual visitor to Muhammad. Or perhaps Christian polemic isn't really a proof that Muhammad had supernatural visitations, but is simply polemic , designed to attack what others say as false. |
|
02-10-2008, 12:38 AM | #3 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
|
Quote:
None. Even among Christian sources, I think Matthew is the only one to claim there was such an allegation. |
|
02-10-2008, 05:13 AM | #4 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
|
Quote:
Quote:
In Lee Stoebel's 'The Case For Christ,' after discussing the empty tomb at length, Craig basically ends up saying "but the empty tomb is not really a big deal since Jesus obviously rose from the dead no matter where he was buried?," in which case, why did Craig bother to discuss the empty tomb at all? If God really wanted to convince everyone that Jesus rose from the dead, he would not have had any trouble at all doing that. |
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|