FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-25-2003, 11:50 AM   #1
Tod
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 152
Default What are the oldest confirmed manuscripts?

From THE ASSOCIATED PRESS, an article entitled: Dismissal of Jesus inscription called hasty Scholars: Authenticity of burial box unsettled

The oldest confirmed surviving artifact that mentions Jesus is a fragment of Chapter 18 in John’s Gospel from a manuscript dating to A.D. 125.

I was under the impression that much older, albeit very small, fragments of the Gospels existed. I realize that many fragments claimed to be much older aren't agreed by most scholars to be as old as they are claimed to be.

Does anybody know of any older confirmed fragments that a majority of scholars agree is older than this, or is this really the oldest confirmed fragment of a gospel?
Tod is offline  
Old 11-25-2003, 11:53 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,635
Default

That is the oldest for the New Testament. Though a few scholars on the margins have made arguments that some of the NT was found in the DSS. Most scholars, whether liberal or conservative, remain unpersuaded.
Layman is offline  
Old 11-25-2003, 12:25 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,146
Default Re: What are the oldest confirmed manuscripts?

Quote:
Originally posted by Tod
From THE ASSOCIATED PRESS, an article entitled: Dismissal of Jesus inscription called hasty Scholars: Authenticity of burial box unsettled

The oldest confirmed surviving artifact that mentions Jesus is a fragment of Chapter 18 in John’s Gospel from a manuscript dating to A.D. 125.
Check out this article, Tod,

THE RYLANDS PAPYRUS FRAUD
http://www.trends.ca/~yuku/bbl/rylands.htm

Best,

Yuri.
Yuri Kuchinsky is offline  
Old 11-25-2003, 02:05 PM   #4
CX
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Portlandish
Posts: 2,829
Default Re: What are the oldest confirmed manuscripts?

Quote:
Originally posted by Tod
From THE ASSOCIATED PRESS, an article entitled: Dismissal of Jesus inscription called hasty Scholars: Authenticity of burial box unsettled

The oldest confirmed surviving artifact that mentions Jesus is a fragment of Chapter 18 in John?s Gospel from a manuscript dating to A.D. 125.

I was under the impression that much older, albeit very small, fragments of the Gospels existed. I realize that many fragments claimed to be much older aren't agreed by most scholars to be as old as they are claimed to be.

Does anybody know of any older confirmed fragments that a majority of scholars agree is older than this, or is this really the oldest confirmed fragment of a gospel?
Nope. That's pretty much it, but it's dating is in question. 125 C.E. is a reasonable concensus, but there are those who consider it somewhat later. That being said there are only 3 tiny scraps that date solidly before 200 C.E. Most of our current greek critical text comes from the 4th century and later. There's a thread in the recommended reading on the MSS evidence for the NT. I'd recommend talking a look if you're interested.
CX is offline  
Old 11-25-2003, 02:08 PM   #5
CX
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Portlandish
Posts: 2,829
Default

The aforementioned thread is available here
CX is offline  
Old 11-25-2003, 03:01 PM   #6
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Default Re: Re: What are the oldest confirmed manuscripts?

Quote:
Originally posted by CX
Nope. That's pretty much it, but it's dating is in question. 125 C.E. is a reasonable concensus, but there are those who consider it somewhat later. That being said there are only 3 tiny scraps that date solidly before 200 C.E. Most of our current greek critical text comes from the 4th century and later. There's a thread in the recommended reading on the MSS evidence for the NT. I'd recommend talking a look if you're interested.
Scnelle, who is rather conservative, believes that it is no longer viable to regard this as a settled concensus, as recent redatings have moved p52 into the second half of the second century (after 150).

Vorkosigan
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 11-25-2003, 03:56 PM   #7
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 1,490
Default Re: Re: Re: What are the oldest confirmed manuscripts?

Quote:
Originally posted by Vorkosigan
Scnelle, who is rather conservative...
Ha!

Philip Comfort, who is rather conservative and a paleographer (as opposed to Schnelle - who is a historian?), dates p52 circa 100-125 AD. And, if I remember right, he gives MSS for paleographic comparison.
Haran is offline  
Old 11-25-2003, 03:57 PM   #8
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 1,490
Default

Here's a question no one has brought up before (that I can think of anyway):

What are the oldest dated MSS of the NT (i.e. with an actual date on them - not dated via paleography)?

I'd research it, but I'm curious to see if anyone else knows...
Haran is offline  
Old 11-25-2003, 04:09 PM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Haran

What are the oldest dated MSS of the NT (i.e. with an actual date on them - not dated via paleography)?

I'd research it, but I'm curious to see if anyone else knows...
I don't. I always thought that dated does not mean with an actual date on them.

ie if I write on the back of something else, that does have a date on, then I can date it using the something else.
Steven Carr is offline  
Old 11-25-2003, 04:09 PM   #10
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by CX
The aforementioned thread is available here
Gosh I hadn't noticed how cute that thread got at the end.

Has the Schmidt palaeographical analysis caught on in the circles yet? It's a dating based on a lot of comparison not used in the original hopeful dating of P52 and places the text late in the second century.


spin
spin is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:21 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.