FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-13-2006, 03:18 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default A third century Christian would do what differently?

Complete the idea, "One of the things that a third century Christian would do differently from their non-Christian counterparts is..."

What was notable of the Christians in the third century? What did they do differently? What was common between them and their neighbors of the time?

--
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 12-13-2006, 04:56 AM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Kirby View Post
Complete the idea, "One of the things that a third century Christian would do differently from their non-Christian counterparts is..."
Make claims to the effect that their writings were being
altered and perverted by "heretics".

Quote:
What was notable of the Christians in the third century?
They had no basilicas.


Quote:
What was common between them and their neighbors of the time?
They were citizens of the Roman empire and rendered
unto Caesar. They probably had small statues and figurines
of deified Roman emperors in their portico. They couldn't
swim a stroke to save themselves if they fell into the water.

They understood the common belief in Apollo, Sol Invictus
and Hermes to the extent that these were the commonly
worshipped gods of their fellow citizens, their next door
neighbours.




Pete
mountainman is offline  
Old 12-13-2006, 06:02 AM   #3
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Kirby View Post
Complete the idea, "One of the things that a third century Christian would do differently from their non-Christian counterparts is..."

What was notable of the Christians in the third century? What did they do differently? What was common between them and their neighbors of the time?

--
Peter Kirby
These questions are extremely arbitrary. There were many Christian Doctrines in the third century and the term 'neighbors' is undetermined in this particular case.

The fact that so much has been lost in terms of writings concerning religious doctrines, and most of the surviving writings have been in possesion of one particular 'tribe of Christian' it is very difficult even to speculate on differences or commomalities.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 12-13-2006, 06:05 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
These questions are extremely arbitrary.
I'm asking for a sociology of the Christians in the third century. (This has nothing to do with 'doctrines'!)

--
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 12-13-2006, 06:09 AM   #5
CJD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: greater Orlando area
Posts: 832
Default

The simplest answer for this, it seems to me, is "…eat the flesh and blood of their Lord and Savior, Jesus the Messiah; share in a common meal, or 'love feast'; meet in secret so as to avoid persecution; claim to worship the one, true god of creation."

Commonalities? Just about everything save regularly visiting the cultic temples for worship.

CJD
CJD is offline  
Old 12-13-2006, 06:14 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CJD View Post
The simplest answer for this, it seems to me, is "…eat the flesh and blood of their Lord and Savior, Jesus the Messiah; share in a common meal, or 'love feast'; meet in secret so as to avoid persecution; claim to worship the one, true god of creation."

Commonalities? Just about everything save regularly visiting the cultic temples for worship.
Thanks CJD!

What kind of meetings in secret were these?

What kind of visits were they skipping out on?

--
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 12-13-2006, 06:45 AM   #7
CJD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: greater Orlando area
Posts: 832
Default

Greetings, Peter. It's been a while.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Kirby View Post
What kind of meetings in secret were these?
As is commonly known, worshiping this Jesus guy became a religio illicita following the destruction of Jerusalem, which served as the main impetus for his followers to meet in secret.

By the time of the second, and certainly by the third, century, the fledgling assemblies had a 3-tiered organization (bishop, elders, deacons-deconesses, see Ignatius for more info).

It has been said that early baptisms were in the nude, which might surprise our Victorian sensibilities today. Early Christians went to the bathhouse, of course, and nudity was perfectly valid in these washing contexts.

Their meetings were commonly comprised of the following:

1) Reading the TNK, as well as any gospels or letters of Paul available. To be sure, other writings, like the Shepherd of Hermas or the Didache would have also been read.

2) Homilies — often exhortations based on some portion of Scripture. Mostly moral rather than abstract doctrine. Probably more than one speaker rose to offer exhortations.

3) Congregational Prayer

4) Singing

5) the Agape-meal/Eucharist: usually at the same time (the first leading into the other). Before the latter started, however, only those baptized stayed (baptism was actual rite of passage back then, taking 2–3 years). Those remaining then greeted one another with the kiss of peace. An oblation (offeratory) followed; then communion — the recitation of the drama and the breaking of the bread.

The 'love feast' fell by the wayside eventually because of continued abuses.

* Other notables:

A. Wednesday and Friday were days of fasting. Significant part in preparation for worship.

B. Daily "orders" (sometimes 5x times a day)

C. As the Greco-Roman world often practiced infanticide (females and those with developmental problems) by leaving babes on hillsides to die of exposure, followers of Jesus would come and collect them and raise them. Some talk of free Christians trying to liberate Christian slaves by purchasing them has also been noted.

Quote:
What kind of visits were they skipping out on?
I merely assume they did not take part in daily pagan rituals, i.e., keep altars or statues in their homes, pay homage to this or that deity before traveling, scoring some meat at the market, attempting to make babies, etc. They were, after all, accused of atheism (meaning they disregarded Roman gods).

Best,

CJD
CJD is offline  
Old 12-13-2006, 06:49 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

Thanks again CJD.

I will return to this subject in about six centuries. I'm currently working on the ninth century, starting with Photius, as discussed in my 'Working Backwards' thread.

--
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 12-13-2006, 06:57 AM   #9
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Kirby View Post
I'm asking for a sociology of the Christians in the third century. (This has nothing to do with 'doctrines'!)

--
Peter Kirby
Doctrines do affect sociology. There are almost inseparable. Doctrines affect a person's way of life. There is something called the sociological effect of religious doctrines, David Koresh is a gruesome example. And we have the Mormons, the Jim Jones', the sociological effects of doctrines are enormous.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 12-13-2006, 07:01 AM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Doctrines do affect sociology.
Fine. That doesn't change that you jumped all over "doctrines doctrines doctrines" when I wasn't after doctrines in themselves.

In any case, I am killing this thread. Thanks go to CJD for a fine contribution.

--
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:03 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.