Freethought & Rationalism Archive

Calilasseia · 07-24-2007, 01:16 PM

Afdave is back at RDF. So expect to see him pop up here soon as well.

Occam's Aftershave · 07-24-2007, 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Calilasseia

Afdave is back at RDF. So expect to see him pop up here soon as well.

Anyone want to speculate on whether or not Dave will finally provide his evidence for the 1 mile thick layer of Flood sediment in Egypt?

shirley knott · 07-24-2007, 01:48 PM

0% chance of a straightforward answer.
100% chance of obfuscation and objection to the demand that the layer be identifiable world-wide as the same layer.
We've been here before...

hugs,
Shirley Knott

Calilasseia · 07-24-2007, 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Occam's Aftershave

Quote:

Originally Posted by Calilasseia

Afdave is back at RDF. So expect to see him pop up here soon as well.

Anyone want to speculate on whether or not Dave will finally provide his evidence for the 1 mile thick layer of Flood sediment in Egypt?

Still waiting for him to even acknowledge the existence of the thread I provided for the purpose ...

RED DAVE · 07-26-2007, 04:17 PM

I see that praxeus is once again spreading his unique brand of whatever in our midst. So let me remind him of the following

Let me pose once again the two fundamental questions that have been guiding this thread for awhile and which you committeed to answering and have been ducking for over three months.

1) What is your date for the Flood (i.e. the one that you accept for purposes of argument)?

2) If it's approximate (and there's no reason why it shouldn't be), what are the outside limits?

RED DAVE

07-27-2007, 03:45 PM

Dave, since you're back I'm sure you're just salivating at the prospect of dealing thoroughly and convincingly with the points mentioned in these posts. Please, be my guest. I'm all ears.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mung bean

Quote:

Originally Posted by afdave

Population stats and Nile Valley sediment ... both on-topic and something I am quite interested in. I will address them here.

Oh really? You will? Dave, I'm so happy!
I had just about despaired of ever hearing your views on these subjects.

So you're not going to do an Anne Elk mode of address are you?
I mean I'm sure you have a theory but.........
You do realise that convincing me is vital to your cause, don't you? Since I'm a carpenter and JC was a carpenter that means if your arguments wouldn't convince me they wouldn't convince JC either, which would mean you weren't a true Christian. Wouldn't want that.

Occam's Aftershave · 07-29-2007, 09:14 AM

*bumped* so Dave won't forget his promise to show us the 1 mi. deep (which mysteriously went back to 2 mi. deep in Dave's last FD post BTW

) layer of FLUD sediment in Egypt.

Maybe when he's done with that he can explain how the FLUD created that 1000' thick layer of chalk in England that the English Channel forming local flood then cut through.

How about it Dave?

RED DAVE · 07-30-2007, 07:40 PM

And since praxeus continues to post on other threads, let me remind him of his unfinished business, undealt with now for about five months:

Let me pose once again the two fundamental questions that have been guiding this thread for awhile and which you committeed to answering and have been ducking for over three months.

1) What is your date for the Flood (i.e. the one that you accept for purposes of argument)?

2) If it's approximate (and there's no reason why it shouldn't be), what are the outside limits?

RED DAVE

Pappy Jack · 07-31-2007, 01:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RED DAVE

And since praxeus continues to post on other threads, let me remind him of his unfinished business, undealt with now for about five months........RED DAVE

Red Dave, it's beginning to look like the YEC side of the argument is being conceded by absence. Likewise at the threads on Pre-Flood Patriarchs and YEC population projections. Do these count as technical KOs? :devil1:

07-31-2007, 02:37 AM

PJ, however could you suggest such a thing?
They're just marshalling some devastating evidence they are...........

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA:rolling: :rolling: :rolling:

Edit: Just checked and our intrepid (snigger) jet pilot was online here six hours ago. Now I'd love to comment on his arguments but he doesn't seem to be posting any. I think we've defeated him, boys and girls. He hath given up the ghost, poor bugger.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

07-24-2007, 01:16 PM	#681
Calilasseia Veteran Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Near Liverpool, UK Posts: 1,072	Afdave is back at RDF. So expect to see him pop up here soon as well.

07-24-2007, 01:48 PM	#683
shirley knott Regular Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: Madison, WI Posts: 416	0% chance of a straightforward answer. 100% chance of obfuscation and objection to the demand that the layer be identifiable world-wide as the same layer. We've been here before... hugs, Shirley Knott

07-26-2007, 04:17 PM	#685
RED DAVE Banned Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: NYC Posts: 10,532	I see that praxeus is once again spreading his unique brand of whatever in our midst. So let me remind him of the following Let me pose once again the two fundamental questions that have been guiding this thread for awhile and which you committeed to answering and have been ducking for over three months. 1) What is your date for the Flood (i.e. the one that you accept for purposes of argument)? 2) If it's approximate (and there's no reason why it shouldn't be), what are the outside limits? RED DAVE

07-29-2007, 09:14 AM	#687
Occam's Aftershave Veteran Member Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: California Posts: 2,215	*bumped* so Dave won't forget his promise to show us the 1 mi. deep (which mysteriously went back to 2 mi. deep in Dave's last FD post BTW ) layer of FLUD sediment in Egypt. Maybe when he's done with that he can explain how the FLUD created that 1000' thick layer of chalk in England that the English Channel forming local flood then cut through. How about it Dave?

07-30-2007, 07:40 PM	#688
RED DAVE Banned Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: NYC Posts: 10,532	And since praxeus continues to post on other threads, let me remind him of his unfinished business, undealt with now for about five months: Let me pose once again the two fundamental questions that have been guiding this thread for awhile and which you committeed to answering and have been ducking for over three months. 1) What is your date for the Flood (i.e. the one that you accept for purposes of argument)? 2) If it's approximate (and there's no reason why it shouldn't be), what are the outside limits? RED DAVE

07-31-2007, 02:37 AM	#690
mung bean Guest Posts: n/a	PJ, however could you suggest such a thing? They're just marshalling some devastating evidence they are........... BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA:rolling: :rolling: :rolling: Edit: Just checked and our intrepid (snigger) jet pilot was online here six hours ago. Now I'd love to comment on his arguments but he doesn't seem to be posting any. I think we've defeated him, boys and girls. He hath given up the ghost, poor bugger.

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.