Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
10-04-2007, 08:10 AM | #101 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,679
|
Quote:
Now all the writers both of the Old Testament and the New were Hebrews: therefore, a knowledge of the Hebrew language is before all things necessary, not only for the comprehension of the Old Testament, which was written in that tongue, but also of the New: for although the latter was published in other languages, yet its characteristics are Hebrew.--Spinoza, TTP, Chap. 7 I would say that Christ's anti-Pharisaism is expanded into general opposition to rabbinic Judaism. |
|
10-04-2007, 08:19 AM | #102 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Please update your bookmarks for the Journal of Higher Criticism
Citizens of Heaven: Philippians 3:2-21 as a Deutero-Pauline Passage |
10-04-2007, 08:38 AM | #103 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,397
|
Quote:
|
||
10-04-2007, 08:46 AM | #104 | |||
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Quote:
Quote:
spin |
|||
10-04-2007, 08:55 AM | #105 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,397
|
If one seriously studied the Septuagint (sp?), could one develop a certain knowledge of Judaism from it? Would one also betray his source of such knowledge when certain interpretations fell more in-line with this Greek translation than from the Hebrew original from which it was derived?
|
10-04-2007, 09:04 AM | #106 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
|
10-04-2007, 09:09 AM | #107 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Quote:
spin |
|
10-04-2007, 09:26 AM | #108 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
This afternoon I have just seen a Muslim young man and woman eating lunch together in a Park - this is Ramadan.
There is and never has been a uniformity of practice of any religion anywhere. Paul obviously has huge influences from the belief in "the true gods" - as Gore Vidal has Julian putting it, and "the true faith" in comparison to "But the Galileans are wrong." |
10-04-2007, 01:55 PM | #109 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: US Citizen (edited)
Posts: 1,948
|
Quote:
Christos = past participle (used as an adjective or as a noun) of Chrio^, which = I pat lightly; I spread/palm; I plaster. So, "christos" = the palmED/anointED. Chrisis = the act of spreading/palming (or of anointing); etc. Chrisma, -atos = unction, ointment,.... The god-impregnated Miriam was told to name her son Immanuel, but, in another account, she called him Jesus. Anyway, it is the son of God that is referred to as being the Christ (the anointed one, the messiah), but there is no episode in which Jesus was actually anointed. (During his life, his feet were anointed; his corpse was anointed; but he was never anointed king.) His attribute as the Christ comes from biblical reminiscences, or prophesies, about the messiah. On the other hand, YEshua bar Yoseph [not an ImmanuEL] was king by blood, as he was the son of Joseph in the lineage of King David. So, in Christrianity, they speak of Jesus king, not Jesus the Christ. (But just as there is a Biblical confusion of El and Yeh/Yoh/Yah, so there is a confusion betwenn the Basileos and the Christos, which goes back to the different fatherhoods of Jesus.) Two documentary Gods, and two documentary Jesuses -- for those who can read. |
||
10-04-2007, 02:24 PM | #110 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|