Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
08-29-2007, 08:15 AM | #51 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: By Lake Ontario.
Posts: 5,297
|
BibleJohn. Do rabbits chew cud?
No? Then the bible is certainly errant. Next question. . |
08-29-2007, 08:17 AM | #52 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The achingly beautiful San Fernando Valley
Posts: 2,206
|
Quote:
|
||
08-29-2007, 09:30 AM | #53 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Folding@Home in upstate NY
Posts: 14,394
|
|
08-29-2007, 12:01 PM | #54 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Western Sweden
Posts: 3,684
|
Considering the measuring tools at the time, I think it is a valid rounding off. But finding proof for or even reasonably arguments explaining how the sun stood still etc, will be harder for the inerrantists.
|
08-29-2007, 05:22 PM | #55 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SF Bay Area California
Posts: 834
|
|
08-29-2007, 10:34 PM | #56 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Where I go
Posts: 2,168
|
Which bible are we talking about here any way?
|
08-30-2007, 02:56 AM | #57 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,397
|
Maybe the Bible is inerrant, but the God that inspired it is just an intellectually challenged simpleton.
That would explain everything. |
08-30-2007, 05:22 AM | #58 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
|
It is not likely that the Bible is inerrant, and that God inspired it. An inerrant and inspired Bible quite naturally indicates a desire that people have access to it, and we know that it was God's intention to make sure that hundreds of millions of people died without hearing the Gospel message because that is exactly what happened, assuming of course for the sake of argument that the God of the Bible exists. Since God deliberately withheld the Gospel message from hundreds of millions of people who died without hearing it, why would he want anyone to hear it?
If the universe is naturalistic (I am not saying that it is), the Gospel message would have been spread according to the prevailing methods of communication, transportation, printing, and translation of a given time period. Those means are entirely secular. On the other hand, if a God exists, and inspired the Bible, and wanted people to have access to it, he certainly would not depend upon human effort over millennia to make it accessible to people. A child is much more likely to become a Christian if his parents are Christians. This means that God discriminates against the children of skeptics. In the U.S., a much higher percentage of women become Christians than men. This means that God discriminates against men. A much smaller percentage of elderly skeptics become Christians than younger people. That is because elderly people are much less likely to change their worldviews than younger people are. This means that God discriminates against elderly sketpics. If God performs miracle healings today, it is not even debatable that he always discriminates against amputees. However, to God's credit, when he creates hurricanes and kills people with them, he does not discriminate against anyone, and he does not discriminate against innocent animals. |
08-30-2007, 05:45 AM | #59 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 462
|
So the bible is inerrent? Hmmmm...
Now all we need is an inerrant interpreter. I assume, Bible John, that you are he. David. |
08-30-2007, 05:56 AM | #60 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,706
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|