FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-10-2005, 09:28 PM   #31
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,890
Default

Lol, I see I already got defended. Thank you. ISVFan seems to not undes\tand the idea of "truth" and is apparently either making up sources or going to non experts.
FatherMithras is offline  
Old 12-10-2005, 09:29 PM   #32
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,890
Default

Quote:
No it says "Virgin" not maiden. How many years have you had in Hebrew? That's what I thought. I know a man who has studied Hebrew his whole life he has a doctorate and has worked at the Hebrew University in Israel and he says it Virgin. So I'll forgive your lack of knowledge in this area.
What a coincidence. MY friend also attended hebrew University. He lives in Israel right now and used to do archeological work there. AND that's only ONE of my sources.
FatherMithras is offline  
Old 12-11-2005, 04:30 AM   #33
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: High Point, NC, USA
Posts: 1,506
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ISVfan
Look I know it's up to me to prove it. You are all right. But say there was a third position that wasn't athiest or Christian
Let's call it, for arguments sake, say...Hindubuddhislamastrianism.

Quote:
and we were both making cases your point of view would have no more proof than mine to the person who was wondering what to believe. I can't say look here's proof it happened and you couldn't say here is proof it didn't happen that was my point.
Actually, no. Atheism is the universal negative. For any position on the question of "do gods exist" that is distinct from atheism, atheism is the negation of that position, and that position has the burden of proof if it wants anyone to believe in whatever deities it claims exist.

You mentioned me making a case for atheism to a non-christian theist. Don't you realize that the only way to do that (to offer evidence for the negative) would be to tear down the arguments for his theism? In other words, don't you realize that my position is the default recourse when his position becomes untenable?

You might try looking up the "presumption of atheism" argument.
David Vestal is offline  
Old 12-11-2005, 04:23 PM   #34
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,890
Default

I'd still like an apology from ISVfan for spouting off without having any idea of what he's talking about.
FatherMithras is offline  
Old 12-11-2005, 08:24 PM   #35
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Somers, MT
Posts: 78
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FatherMithras
I'd still like an apology from ISVfan for spouting off without having any idea of what he's talking about.
Apologize for what? I said you didn't know Hebrew you don't. Ok you have a friend I have a friend both seem to have the same credentials another poster suggested my friend was a Christian this is false. He is actually of the Jewish Religion that believes the Messiah is yet to come. But he believes he will be Virgin born. I apologize for assuming you just picked your position but I will not apologize for saying you don't know Hebrew.
ISVfan is offline  
Old 12-11-2005, 08:31 PM   #36
Moderator -
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ISVfan
Apologize for what? I said you didn't know Hebrew you don't. Ok you have a friend I have a friend both seem to have the same credentials another poster suggested my friend was a Christian this is false. He is actually of the Jewish Religion that believes the Messiah is yet to come. But he believes he will be Virgin born. I apologize for assuming you just picked your position but I will not apologize for saying you don't know Hebrew.
Your friend is incredibly ignorant both of the Jewish expectations of the Messiah and of the meaning of Isaiah 7:14....not to mention Hebrew.

Dude, take my word for it. You're woefully misinformed.
Diogenes the Cynic is offline  
Old 12-11-2005, 09:51 PM   #37
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ol' London Town, UK.
Posts: 529
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ISVfan
I can't say look here's proof it happened and you couldn't say here is proof it didn't happen that was my point.
I think you are willfully ignoring the point here.

The onus is on the person making the claim to prove it is true, not on the person refuting it prove it is false.

If I claim to know that inside my fridge lives a nation of tiny brown aliens who dissapear on inspection, is it up to you to disprove (the unfalsifiable) or is it up to me to show you evidence that this phenomenon actually exists ?

It would appear your strength of conviction is based on the idea that your notions cannot be disproved. If you cannot say 'look here's proof it happened' then why do you think it is true, wishful thinking ?



:down:
Straight A is offline  
Old 12-11-2005, 09:52 PM   #38
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: East Lansing, Michigan
Posts: 4,243
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diogenes the Cynic
Your friend is full of it. It says almah. Almah means "young woman." It does not mean "virgin." The Hebrew word for virgin is bethulah.
Curious, is bethulah always translated as "virgin". Likewise is almah always translated as young maiden or some equivalent?
buckshot23 is offline  
Old 12-12-2005, 04:48 AM   #39
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,890
Default

Quote:
Curious, is bethulah always translated as "virgin". Likewise is almah always translated as young maiden or some equivalent?
Not sure. However, if God is perfect he'd at least use the word most suited to the description, as opposed to one that could "sort of imply" it.
FatherMithras is offline  
Old 12-12-2005, 06:10 AM   #40
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: East Lansing, Michigan
Posts: 4,243
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FatherMithras
Not sure. However, if God is perfect he'd at least use the word most suited to the description, as opposed to one that could "sort of imply" it.
Neither word is always translated that way. There is no word that always means virgin as far as I know.
buckshot23 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:59 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.