FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-31-2008, 02:22 PM   #31
vid
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Myjava, Slovakia
Posts: 384
Default

Quote:
What are these references to 5500 about? Was that thought to be a mid point in a universal timeline?
That was error on my part, I thought this one was used for dating, but in fact it was other reference (cited in later post). It was supposed to be dating from Creation, which several christian authors have fixed as "XXX years ago".

Quote:
And Eusebius if he didn't write the Gospel birth stories looks like he heavily edited them!
I don't see relevance of this to early commentaries on Jesus birth date. Am I missing something here?
vid is offline  
Old 09-30-2008, 05:18 PM   #32
vid
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Myjava, Slovakia
Posts: 384
Default

Finally, I found Hippolytus' On Daniel translated to english in ANF5, online here:

http://www.ewtn.com/library/PATRISTC/anf5-3.txt

What's weird, I can't find any 25th december, 8 days before kalends of january, or even 2nd April there:
Quote:
On Daniel 4
For the first appearance of our Lord in the flesh took place in Bethlehem, under Augustus, in the year 5500; and He suffered in the thirty-third year.
Did all those sources (I named two of them) use different (more complete) translation, or did they make 25th december up, or wtf? Can someone please check the greek text provided by Ben C Smith, whether it contains anything more in fourth chapter?
vid is offline  
Old 09-30-2008, 06:01 PM   #33
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
Chilli: please, leave theological discussions out of this thread. This is intended to be factual thread about early christian commentaries on jesus/christ birth day, nothing else.
Dear Vid,

You have not seen fit to make comment about the unworthiness or otherwise those citations with respect to the comments of the ancient Roman poets that were cited by Constantine the Great, in the extant document known as The Oration to the Saints, delivered personally perhaps by Constantine at the (military supremacy) Council of Antioch, c.324 CE.

My reference to Robin Lane-Fox (above) is worth noting. This author spends perhaps as much as 40-50 pages (I dont have the book in front of me - but it is many pages) on the treatment of this historical document known as Constantine's Oration to the Saints.

If you include these BCE citations from Constantine I will be happy, but if you choose to selectively preclude these citations from your chart, then I'd like to know the rationale behind this.

As far as I am aware the majority of scholars regard the dating of this document, and its authenticity, as reasonably secure around 324/325 CE. Surely this in inside the 5 century circumscribe you set.


Best wishes,


Pete
mountainman is offline  
Old 09-30-2008, 06:31 PM   #34
vid
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Myjava, Slovakia
Posts: 384
Default

mountainman: Honestly, I didn't really understand how your post relates to topic, and since I don't own book you used, I found it pointless to inquire any deeper.

I suspect those "ancient predictions" are, much like some prophecies about Jesus in OT, just random similarities, different instances of same god-memes, and adaptations of "pagan" ideas to christianity.

My point was more about exploring any christian tradition that could hold additional (apart from biblical/apocryphal sources) information on jesus birth date, and to map spread of various dates for birth. If you think that Constantine's oration contains part significant to this topic (comments on birth date of Jesus), please post them here, I'd be mostly thankful.
vid is offline  
Old 10-01-2008, 02:36 AM   #35
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
I also found lot of unsourced references saying that it was Aurelius (~270 AD), who made decree about 25th december being Sol Invictus feast. Does anyone know source for this claim?
I found this one interesting myself, and have been looking for it. But as far as I can tell, no evidence for this exists. Instead there is a chain of possibilities.

The data behind all this is the presence in the Chronography of 354 part 6 of a statement that 25 Dec. is "Natalis Invicti"; and various references in ancient literature to Aurelian creating the Sol Invictus cult in 274 and dedicating a temple of the Sun in that year.

Now for the theory! The question is what "Natalis Invicti" means. Anachronistic ideas of celebrating the "birth" of a deity aside, it may equally mean the anniversary of the date of the founding of a temple; which would explain the Natalis of other deities in the same Chronography. The number of chariot races indicates a late founded festival. If this is the festival of the anniversary of the consecration of the temple of Sol Invictus, as we know that Aurelian did that, and that he did it in 274, then we come up with Dec. 25 274 as the date of the dedication of that temple.

If anyone knows more than me on this, I'd love to hear it. That's what I have got so far.

All the best,

Roger Pearse
Roger Pearse is offline  
Old 10-01-2008, 02:37 AM   #36
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
mountainman: Honestly, I didn't really understand how your post relates to topic, and since I don't own book you used, I found it pointless to inquire any deeper.
<Edit>
Roger Pearse is offline  
Old 10-01-2008, 02:50 AM   #37
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
Thanks.

I was only able to grab the badly OCRed version of Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics. That "Christmas" article (page 606) contains nice info on De Pascha Computus (greek quotation), Hippolytus (discussion of manuscripts), some "Clementine homily" which I didn't really understand (with greek quotation), Ephrahim Syrus (need to review it more), and more.

I will have to wait to until i can download the 100MB scanned version, and go through it.
That article on Christmas (by Lake) is a cracker, isn't it?

The text of the Commentary on Daniels by Hippolytus is given in Greek, but then the question raised as to whether Hippolytus said it. The text is being recovered from chunks in catenae, I think, not a continuous text. I've corrected the OCR:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirsopp Lake
But it has been a greatly disputed point how much of this text is really due to Hippolytus.

There are available for the text codex A (saec. xi.) in the monastery of Vatopedi, codex B (saec. XV.) at Chalki, codex J (saec. xi.) in the library of Prince Chigi, and codex P (saec. xiii.), Paris Gr. 159.

There are also a Slavic version, and quotations in Syriac by George the Arabian (ed. Lagarde, Analecta Syriaca, Leipzig, 1858, pp. 108-134), a bishop of the 8th cent, (d. 724).

Of these authorities J Geo read merely . . . ., thus omitting the exact day of the month ; and A, while agreeing in the main with the group BP Slav., has the curious ....
"George the Arabian" is of course George, Bishop of the Arab Tribes.

I'm away from home so can't check my handbooks.

All the best,

Roger Pearse
Roger Pearse is offline  
Old 10-01-2008, 03:30 AM   #38
vid
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Myjava, Slovakia
Posts: 384
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Pearse View Post
That article on Christmas (by Lightfoot) is a cracker, isn't it?
Definitively... Yesterday i grabbed full scan. Only downside is that he doesn't provide translation for greek / latin texts, so I loose track easily reading it . Btw, AFAIK article is by Kirsopp Lake, not J.B.Lightfoot.

Quote:
On the monument of Hippolytus in the Lateran Museum
there is, on the left hand side, the I'aschal cycle of 112 years for
222 to 333 (see CIG 8613) ; and against the date wpo 5 vut an-pci
(=Apr. 2) stands -yeveo-ts x ' (XptcjTou tTjo-oiJ, or a mistake for
\Vt XplOTOU?).
Finally some proper reference. What is "CIG", and where to find it?
vid is offline  
Old 10-01-2008, 03:59 AM   #39
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Pearse View Post
That article on Christmas (by Lightfoot) is a cracker, isn't it?
Definitively... Yesterday i grabbed full scan. Only downside is that he doesn't provide translation for greek / latin texts, so I loose track easily reading it . Btw, AFAIK article is by Kirsopp Lake, not J.B.Lightfoot.
Oops. Fixed.

Quote:
Quote:
On the monument of Hippolytus in the Lateran Museum
there is, on the left hand side, the Paschal cycle of 112 years for
222 to 333 (see CIG 8613) ; and against the date wpo 5 vut an-pci
(=Apr. 2) stands -yeveo-ts x ' (XptcjTou tTjo-oiJ, or a mistake for
\Vt XplOTOU?).
Finally some proper reference. What is "CIG", and where to find it?
CIG = Corpus Inscriptionum Graecorum. Bound to be some series of massive folio volumes only available to very few. Might be some database online, tho.
Roger Pearse is offline  
Old 10-01-2008, 09:52 AM   #40
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bordeaux France
Posts: 2,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivedurdle View Post
What are these references to 5500 about? Was that thought to be a mid point in a universal timeline?

And Eusebius if he didn't write the Gospel birth stories looks like he heavily edited them!

Cause and effect often works either way!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sextus_Julius_Africanus

Sextus Julius Africanus calculated the period between Creation and Jesus as 5500 years, placing the Incarnation on the first day of AM 5501 (our modern March 25, 1 BC), according to Venance Grumel, La Chronologie (1958).
Huon is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:08 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.