Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
01-04-2010, 11:54 PM | #1 |
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: currently south India, then England for a bit
Posts: 2
|
Suggestions of Scholarly work on Errancy in the Bible???
Sorry if this is repetitive, though I performed the prerequisite scan of the first two pages; yet I don't see a search function, but didn't look hard.
Anyway, has anyone read: "The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture (or via: amazon.co.uk)" by Ehrman? How was it? Any other suggestions for non-introductory works? Metzger? Thanks! |
01-05-2010, 01:01 AM | #2 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
You can sample pages on Amazon or google books. It is not strictly about errancy.
What have you read so far, and what are you interested in? |
01-05-2010, 10:25 AM | #3 |
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: currently south India, then England for a bit
Posts: 2
|
so far I've read some basic textual criticism: uncial, minuscules, papyri, parchments, etc. Specific ones (Sinaiticus, Vaticanus...) and families and how they're used in addition to the various errors of transmission.
I'd be interested in a work that covers the specifics of many (all would be a bit much) of particularly the papyri, since most variations, as I've read, occurred early on, pre-Constantine. hmm, I'll probably check out "The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture," any further recommendations? thanks |
01-05-2010, 10:39 AM | #4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 88
|
I don't know of any books specifically devoted to this. Errors become evident enough as you read and study biblical scholarship...they find and discuss them all the time in the course of their historical research.
Ehrman's Orthodox Corruption is not so much about 'error' as it is about its subtitle. I wouldn't know what to suggest. Hector Avalos maybe? Finis, ELB |
01-05-2010, 11:29 AM | #5 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Midwest, USA
Posts: 106
|
Quote:
It does say a lot about how copyists [mis]handled sacred text to suit an agenda. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|