Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
12-20-2003, 10:29 AM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: University of Arkansas
Posts: 1,033
|
Under OT Law, Virgin Mary should have been stoned
As I read Deut. 22:23-24, both the Virgin Mary and the Holy Spirit should have been brought to the town gate and stoned to death. Mary was pledged to marry another, yet was made pregnant by God. Of course, God was above his own laws, but was Mary?
|
12-20-2003, 12:18 PM | #2 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Quote:
The punishment for adultery was so severe that legal minds managed to find ways around it. During the Monica Lewinsky national obsession, some Jewish rabbis did give their opinion that oral sex was not adultery - that because the consequences were so drastic, the crime was defined very strictly. |
|
12-20-2003, 10:41 PM | #3 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Monroeville, Ohio, USA
Posts: 440
|
Adultery is being unfaithful. It is about faith --- not sexual intercourse. The adultery did not occur until Jesus was 12 (actually 24) years old in 17/18 CE when he chose another father (with a father being a chief priest and not a daddy). Joseph (Cleophas) was the holy spirit and Jesus' daddy.
|
12-20-2003, 10:55 PM | #4 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
|
Re: Under OT Law, Virgin Mary should have been stoned
Quote:
|
|
12-21-2003, 04:27 PM | #5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,743
|
Depends. I've heard discussion on this suggesting Mary's family was higher up in the Jewish social scale than others, and so their status prevented her from being prosecuted (wow, just like rich people today). I've also heard others suggesting it was all, of course, just a legend created to exemplify Jesus' birth and conception into something divine, therefore going by the "The Holy Spirit Protected Her" dogma. Others say it was rape, so therefore no one could prove her infidelity. Of course, the last one falls flat in the face of gender issues at the time. I'm mostly a subscriber to the old "It's a legend/myth. Don't think too hard about the specifics" school.
|
12-21-2003, 05:43 PM | #6 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
The virgin birth must be contemplated in view of a non-virgin birth and Mary is just the name given to be juxtaposed with the Eve who will do a non-virgin rebirth anytime, anyplace, whenever a "carcass" [read bleading heart] is found. |
|
12-21-2003, 09:08 PM | #7 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,743
|
Legends and myths are based on interpretations of events. As your many weird and wonderful posts about your interpretations of these myths goes to show
|
12-22-2003, 12:34 PM | #8 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: England
Posts: 3,934
|
But God never had sexual intercourse with Mary did he? nor had she had sexual relations with a man at the time because she was a virgin.
God impregnated Mary with Jesus, through some magical supernatural powers that we can only speculate on. god did not have sex with Mary. Artificial inpregnation doesn't constitute a loss of virginity does it?? Therefore Mary was above reproach. It was only suggested she might be stoned by those who didn't know or didn't believe that she had indeed been implanted by God. |
12-22-2003, 12:52 PM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,794
|
If not stoned, at least drunk to believe the "Hey Baby, I'm God!" pick-up line. . . .
--J.D. |
12-22-2003, 05:21 PM | #10 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|