FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-19-2011, 02:52 PM   #1
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default new CFI online course: Was Jesus Resurrected?

SCI 221-0112: "Was Jesus Resurrected?"
January 1 – January 31, 2012

Instructor: Robert M. Price, PhD, author and professor of theology and scriptural studies, Johnnie Colemon Theological Seminary

Instructor: John Shook, PhD, CFI director of education

This one-month, four-module course examines Christianity's claims about the divinity and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

Course Topics:
  • Skepticism towards the New Testament
  • The implausibility of Jesus' resurrection
  • Refuting theological defenders of resurrection
  • The mythical and theological invention of the figure of Jesus

Readings: Students will purchase their own copies of Jesus is Dead (or via: amazon.co.uk) (American Atheist Press, 2007) by Robert M. Price. Supplemental papers and lectures will be made available online at no extra cost to students.

Register Here

eta: Jesus is Dead is now available as an ebook, which can be ordered on Price's homepage (scroll down through the book section.)
Toto is offline  
Old 12-19-2011, 06:31 PM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Default

Thanks.
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 12-19-2011, 06:37 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,679
Default

Notice how they weasel from "was he resurrected?" to "was he even real?" A pretty underhanded bait-and-switch from the mythicist poobahs.
No Robots is offline  
Old 12-19-2011, 07:16 PM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by No Robots View Post
Notice how they weasel from "was he resurrected?" to "was he even real?" A pretty underhanded bait-and-switch from the mythicist poobahs.
Notice that a Core Principle of the Historical Method (shared by all positions) is that any given source may be forged or corrupted.

Quote:
SCI 221-0112: "Was Jesus Resurrected?"
January 1 – January 31, 2012
mountainman is offline  
Old 12-19-2011, 07:24 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 730
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by No Robots View Post
Notice how they weasel from "was he resurrected?" to "was he even real?" A pretty underhanded bait-and-switch from the mythicist poobahs.
I would have thought that one of the ways to show that there was no resurrection might be to address the possibility of the mythical and theological invention of the figure of Jesus. Where is the bait-and-switch?
aspronot is offline  
Old 12-20-2011, 04:44 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by No Robots View Post
Notice how they weasel from "was he resurrected?" to "was he even real?" A pretty underhanded bait-and-switch from the mythicist poobahs.
Are you suggesting that questions about his actual existence are irrelevant to the question of whether he was resurrected?
Doug Shaver is offline  
Old 12-20-2011, 05:56 AM   #7
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

The very fact that there is a QUEST for the historical Jesus MUST imply that the present Jesus of the NT is NOT known to be a figure of history.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 12-20-2011, 06:19 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,679
Default

I'm just saying that it's gutless for these posers to bury the controversial question under something else that isn't a problem for rationalists.
No Robots is offline  
Old 12-20-2011, 09:03 AM   #9
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by No Robots View Post
I'm just saying that it's gutless for these posers to bury the controversial question under something else that isn't a problem for rationalists.
CFI has already sponsored a course on the historicity of Jesus, so the question isn't really hidden. Dr. Price's position on the issue is well known.

And it seems to be a big problem for a lot of people who claim to be rationalists, yet suffer from Mythicist Derangement Syndrome.
Toto is offline  
Old 12-20-2011, 09:20 AM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,679
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
And it seems to be a big problem for a lot of people who claim to be rationalists, yet suffer from Mythicist Derangement Syndrome.
That's what I'm saying: mythicism is a big problem for many rationalists, so it is sneaky to bring it into a course on the Resurrection, which most rationalists already reject.
No Robots is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:41 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.