FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Elsewhere > ~Elsewhere~
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-07-2007, 09:52 PM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bethesda
Posts: 3,324
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by samurai
2. If you say yes, then, do you have a concrete and hard evidences for ET, to be labeled as "naturalistic" science?
ET (which is often referred to as ToE) can be considered a "naturalistic" science because it does not invoke any type of supernatural entity or process. Random mutations and natural selection are both strictly naturalistic phenomena.
JustinFoldsFive is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 09:53 PM   #22
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 5,914
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by samurai View Post
1. Do you believe that Evolution Theory is really basing its explanation naturally?
No, but I do know it does, as far as I understand.

Quote:
I mean, is ET (Evolution Theory) really the sole natural explanation of nature?
No, it's not, and if you don't know that, then are we to expect you're going to refute it anyway? Shouldn't you understand it first?

Quote:
2. If you say yes, then, do you have a concrete and hard evidences for ET, to be labeled as "naturalistic" science?
You mean the fossil record and genetic evidence?

Quote:
I can not find one.
There's plenty described in the literature. Like you I'm not an expert, but it's still interesting to read about it.
_Naturalist_ is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 09:59 PM   #23
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,504
Post

Quote:
samurai:
I can prove it.
Go ahead.

Peez
Peez is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 10:05 PM   #24
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,834
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by samurai
There is no bad in trying. There is also no bad in questioning old Theories and debunking them and replacing with new and logical scientific explanation.
One correct thing you've said so far. Unfortunately, this is how evolutionary theory came about. It replaced the old theory of creation.

Learn a little history.

Cheers,
Lane
Worldtraveller is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 10:09 PM   #25
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Near Liverpool, UK
Posts: 1,072
Default

So this proof ... when is it coming?

And when do we get invited to your Nobel acceptance ceremony upon your publishing it?
Calilasseia is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 10:21 PM   #26
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NSW, Australia
Posts: 1,281
Default

I would think that someone who was able to prove the falsity of evolution would necessarily understand evolutionary theory and its supporting evidence better than anybody, and so have no need to ask any questions about it, especially such pedestrian ones as samurai is posing.
Djugashvillain is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 10:29 PM   #27
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,834
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by samurai View Post
Evolution Theory (ET) is not natural science. It is supernatural, fable, mythological, and pokemon-styled- science.

I can prove it.

Now, I am a Christian.
Worldtraveller is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 10:36 PM   #28
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southleast
Posts: 1,537
Default

Wow, the OP owes me a new keyboard. I haven't laughed that hard reading a post in awhile.
JetBlckNewYr03 is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 10:39 PM   #29
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NSW, Australia
Posts: 1,281
Default

It's what happens when your understanding of evolution comes from reading a cartoon place-mat at the Creation Museum diner.
Djugashvillain is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 11:26 PM   #30
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,836
Default

I certainly hope that samurai hasn't gone to bed. I'm not sure I can sleep tonight, what with the cloud of earth-shattering anticipation resting over this thread.

We've all got scientific blue-balls here, samurai (metaphorically speaking, of course); make with the proofs, please!
someotherguy is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:35 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.